Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WinWin Bet Global

Channel

WinWin Bet Global

@winwinbet_global

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,057subscribers

+389 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002028417648
TypeChannel
Username@winwinbet_global
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/winwinbet_global

Growth

19,66820,06119,864.57 August 2026 — 19,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,687 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,706 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,727 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,731 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,053 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,049 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,061 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,044 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,041 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,057 subscribers20,0577 August 202620 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 13 days, net +389. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,609–20,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 06:4420,057+10
19 Aug 2026, 07:4720,047+6
18 Aug 2026, 09:1120,041-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:3820,044-17
16 Aug 2026, 02:0620,061+12
14 Aug 2026, 15:2820,049-4
13 Aug 2026, 02:2720,053+51
12 Aug 2026, 02:4220,002+271
10 Aug 2026, 23:0819,731+4
9 Aug 2026, 21:1319,727+21
8 Aug 2026, 22:0319,706+19
7 Aug 2026, 21:3119,687+19
7 Aug 2026, 16:4819,668first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 20,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,170
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held34 (18 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total82,361
Reactions total1,189
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,737 reactions across 34 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,22970.8%
🔥22412.9%
👍1568.98%
🤯402.30%
271.55%
🥰221.27%
😁201.15%
👏140.806%
😎50.288%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,737reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC581 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📤ATLÉTICO vs MALAGA: IT LOOKS LIKE BOTH TO SCORE AT 2.21 LaLiga newcomers Malaga are kicking off their season at the Metropolitano, where the hosts are the clear favorites. This summer, Malaga have already drawn 3-3 against Leicester, 2-2 against Al-Ittihad, and won 4-2 against Al-Araby. One thing's for sure: this won't be a dull match! Atlético have also had their fair share of excitement: 4-1 against Getafe, 1-

🔥106👍6

17 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,430 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

⚡️€500,000 UP FOR GRABS - GET SPINNING In Spinergy by Formula Spin, every spin moves you up the leaderboard. The total prize pool is €500,000, and first place gets €15,000.🤑 How can you get involved? It's simple: For every €0.20 you bet, you'll earn 1 point - so there's no need to sell your house to take part! To get started, all you need is one spin using real money, no convoluted quests with 35 steps. The tou

23🔥6🤯3

17 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈1,430 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

😀WINWIN BET IS BACK ON INSTAGRAM! Meet our new character! You'll find: ⚫️Top sports analysis ⚫️Sports news and exclusives ⚫️Memes ⚫️Transfer rumors and much more! Why are you still here? Go give us a follow now!

17🔥2🥰2

16 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,750 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

😳EASY OUTCOME FOR ARSENAL VS CITY AT 1.65! The two highest-scoring teams of last season's EPL will face off in the battle for the FA Community Shield. Arsenal are dangerous up front, and City are unlikely to give up on their attacking football, even after a change of manager. 😳Admin's pick: Both Teams to Score - 1.65 This bet landed twice last season: both head-to-head EPL matches ended with goals from both sides

12👍11🔥6

15 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,790 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🌟 ISLAM MAKHACHEV VS IAN GARRY: WILL IT GO THE DISTANCE? Islam will face Ian Garry at UFC 330 in one of the most intriguing matches on the card. At 191cm tall, with long reach and strong range, Garry is a formidable opponent for Makhachev. Islam will have to try to get closer and work his way to the ground. Therefore, a full fight scenario looks very lively. 🫶 Admin is betting on the fight going the distance at

9👍6🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,730 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ARSENAL VS MAN CITY: THE RETURN OF ENGLISH FOOTBALL! Missing the action? The season kicks off with the battle for the FA Community Shield! On Sunday, the two top contenders for English trophies will face off again. Enzo Maresca will have the chance to prove himself as City's new manager, but EPL champion Arteta has his own plans for the game. Who'll win? 🔥 - The Gunners, no question ❤️ - City

14🔥6🤯4👍3

14 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,970 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🆕NEW GAME WITH 97% RTP - COME WITH US TO YOKAI Meet YOKAI by BGaming — a place where Japanese legends come to life: ancient spirits and demons await you in this world of dark temples and sakura blossom🌸 The good stuff: ➕RTP: 97% ➕Max win: x8,000 ➕Wild symbols and growing multipliers ➕Free Spins with Sticky Wilds ➕Bonus Buy for anyone who just can't wait During Free Spins, the world of Yokai changes, and your bala

21🔥64

14 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC≈2,090 views46 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🏆 BRING ON THE COMPETITION WINNERS! An incredible match, a tough battle, but still a win for PSG The competition winners have already claimed their free bet! Remember, the winners were chosen RANDOMLY from everyone who fulfilled the terms. 👀 Check your account — you might be on the list of winners. 🔥 — I've claimed it ❤️ — I'll be lucky next time

23🔥18🥰3👍2

13 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,450 views202 reactionsread 20 August 2026

👣BRO, YOUR BONUS IS ALREADY ON THE WAY! We know you’ve been waiting for it, checking your balance and already thinking about what you’re going to use it on. Unfortunately, there’s been a delay due to some technical issues.😢 But there’s good news too — all bonuses will definitely arrive tomorrow! And while we wait, there’s one way we can try to speed up the delivery… FLOOD THIS POST WITH ❤️ SO YOUR BONUSES GET TO

184👍9😎5🥰4

12 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,840 views54 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🤟PSG vs ASTON VILLA: A BATTLE FOR THE UEFA SUPER CUP! We're kicking off the new season of European cup competitions with a huge match: the UCL winners vs the UEL winners. PSG are the favorites, but Villa have shown that they can create problems for the Parisians. In their last two head-to-head matches, the teams exchanged goals and found the back of the net 9 times between them. Get absolute top odds of 1.77 for

34🔥13👍7

11 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈3,770 views257 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

⚡️GUESS THE WINNERS OF THE UEFA SUPER CUP AND GET A €4 FREE BET! The football season is officially starting, and we're kicking off our promo for PSG vs Aston Villa! The terms are simple: ⚫️ Be a subscriber on Telegram ⚫️ Write who'll win in the comments: PSG or ASTON VILLA ⚫️ Include your ID in your comment Example: PSG, 234567981 📌 Rules: — Your prediction will only be accepted before the match starts — One co

227🔥14🥰8🤯5👍21

10 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈3,300 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

❌ARE PSG REALLY READY FOR ASTON VILLA? Due to the World Cup, some of the Parisians' leaders have only been back at the club for a few days before the final. While PSG try to remember where they put their boots, Aston Villa have been playing friendly matches for several weeks 😁 The Parisian squad is clearly stronger, but Emery's has already defeated PSG 3-2. I don't think this will be a walk in the park for the fa

19👍5🔥2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @winwinbet_global. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@winwinbet_global edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,178,783 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WinWin Bet Global” (@winwinbet_global), 20,057 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winwinbet_global.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.