Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 65 days, net -1,027. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,302–4,637 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 21:21
3,456
-94
5 Oct 2026, 16:55
3,550
-134
28 Sept 2026, 08:18
3,684
-158
18 Sept 2026, 11:38
3,842
-48
14 Sept 2026, 12:18
3,890
-24
11 Sept 2026, 02:59
3,914
-44
5 Sept 2026, 22:20
3,958
-45
2 Sept 2026, 02:13
4,003
-42
30 Aug 2026, 03:46
4,045
-174
26 Aug 2026, 20:48
4,219
-182
23 Aug 2026, 18:08
4,401
-23
20 Aug 2026, 07:03
4,424
-13
17 Aug 2026, 11:08
4,437
-19
14 Aug 2026, 07:06
4,456
-13
10 Aug 2026, 17:26
4,469
-12
7 Aug 2026, 20:28
4,481
-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:47
4,483
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5413635577427813387
84
38.4%
👍
62
28.3%
🔥
42
19.2%
❤
18
8.22%
👀
5
2.28%
😍
3
1.37%
❤🔥
2
0.913%
🤔
2
0.913%
🤩
1
0.457%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 5 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wigwamarch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 25 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
20.0%
1 of 5 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,360
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,380
over 4 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGtA4WD
1
25 May 2026
25 May 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 25 May 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
НА ГЛУБИНЕ 101 | 250-метровая башня, центром которой является вертикальный бассейн
Концепция башни и ее название отсылает к рекорду российского фридайвера Натальи Молчановой, первой женщины, погрузившейся глубже ста метров на задержке дыхания. В проекте эта цифра становится архитектурой: водный объем превращается в вертикальный композиционный центр здания.
— ахритектор Дарья Белякова, Arch(e)type
Проект «101М» заду…
☘️ «ТРИЛИСТНИК» | Многофункциональный спортивный комплекс в Геленджике
Три спортивных направления — три лепестка. Именно эта идея легла в основу архитектурной композиции физкультурно-оздоровительного комплекса, разработанного бюро «МАСТЕРПЛАН».
Каждый из лепестков вмещает в себя отдельное направление: художественную гимнастику, водные виды спорта и единоборства. Так сложная внутренняя логистика объекта превратилась…
BRIDGE HOUSE | Необычный индийский ресторан из морских контейнеров
Бюро Wallmakers использовало редкое сочетание материалов для постройки ресторана — здание создано из стали, глины и 12-ти разрезанных контейнеров.
Высота потолков на длинном и узком участке визуально увеличена благодаря вертикальным разрезам контейнеров. Они установлены в шахматном порядке и приварены к стальному каркасу 🔩
Внешняя поверхность покры…
КЛУБНЫЙ ДОМ В СТИЛЕ НЕОКЛАССИКИ | Новый проект бюро HADAA
Исторический доходный дом (проект Ивана Майснера, 1904) начнет свою новую главу совсем скоро.
Его переосмыслит и воссоздаст архитектурное бюро HADDA, сохранив элементы классической архитектуры и эклектику:
Большое влияние на концепцию проекта оказал контекст локации, неразрывно связанный с многовековой историей столицы. От стрелецких усадеб до квартир знаме…
A FOREST IN THE HOUSE | Одноэтажный частный дом в лесах Парагвая
Проект Equipo de Arquitectura в Сан-Бернардино — пример того, как природные ландшафты вписывают в архитектуру, создавая из них ориентиры для будущей постройки 🐇
Пространственную форму здания сформировали деревья — такой метод архитекторы бюро сравнили с джазовой импровизацией, где один инструмент направляет другой.
🐇 Площадь дома составляет 260 квадр…
custom 541363557742781338734👍21🔥17😍3❤🔥2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @wigwamarch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WIGWAM” (@wigwamarch), 3,456 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wigwamarch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.