Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 67 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,981–2,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 05:27
1,993
-4
6 Oct 2026, 18:37
1,997
-10
29 Sept 2026, 11:01
2,007
-11
19 Sept 2026, 13:36
2,018
-9
14 Sept 2026, 15:37
2,027
-4
11 Sept 2026, 07:40
2,031
-4
6 Sept 2026, 20:37
2,035
-6
2 Sept 2026, 05:53
2,041
-3
30 Aug 2026, 06:54
2,044
-1
27 Aug 2026, 17:03
2,045
-6
24 Aug 2026, 10:24
2,051
-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:42
2,053
-7
17 Aug 2026, 23:23
2,060
-5
14 Aug 2026, 16:35
2,065
-6
10 Aug 2026, 21:03
2,071
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:48
2,075
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:02
2,075
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5258456562187381288
31
60.8%
👍
10
19.6%
❤
3
5.88%
💅
3
5.88%
❤🔥
2
3.92%
😎
2
3.92%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2022 to 9 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whbots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2022 to 9 July 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Running bots 🤖:
@wordcounterbot
- counts the number of words, characters etc in a text
@qrgenerobot
- generates a QR code for you instantly when you send a text message
Feel free to contact @whaow if you have any suggestions, issues or reports.
If you find the bots helpful, please support us by tapping on the ⭐️ reaction below! Thank you.
Archived bots 📦:
@currentweatherbot
- send you the current weather of any …
🆕 @pollinationsbot
Powered by pollinations.ai, the bot can generate any image when you send a prompt to it.
(The photo above was generated by AI with the bot)
🔄 Minor update:
@wordcounterbot now counts the number of characters too (both including and excluding spaces/line breaks)
Please notify @whaowbot if the bot stops working. Thank you!
New bot: @japanesewordbot 🇯🇵
Similar to @korwordbot, @japanesewordbot helps you in expanding your Japanese vocabulary effortlessly at your own pace 💯
It also supports inline mode to translate your text messages from Japanese to English and vice versa.
PS: Thank you so much to all of you in this channel for the continuous support in my projects!
New bot! @korwordbot 🇰🇷
With the aim to help Korean learners improve their vocabulary, @korwordbot provides users with hundreds of words from different categories.
You can use the bot to translate text from English to Korean and vice versa via inline mode.
More languages to come!
Hi. If you haven't noticed, all the bots were down for some time since the end of 2023 due to some issues with the server. Thankfully, @spoilerbot and @wordcounterbot are active again now since they're the most active bots here, but other bots will still remain inactive temporarily.
Sorry for any inconveniences!
Finally, the issue has been fixed. Try /avatar in @robloxsearchbot now!
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whbots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@whbots named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@wordcounterbotbot named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“whbots” (@whbots), 1,993 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whbots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
