Channel
@whatkch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,406subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001196195045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whatkch |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whatkch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 1,406 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 1,405 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 1,405 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
451 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 146 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 141 | 31.3% | |
| 😢 | 138 | 30.6% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.00% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.77% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.665% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.665% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.665% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2023 to 7 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
还有一个事情需要交代，那就是 Windsys Project 的 QQ 交流群。本以为大家都会“读空气”，没想到现在还在说什么"我什么时候切割你们"这种看起来有点像学生过家家才能说得出来的话，那看来是需要特地拎出来聊一聊了 我几年前没有在 QQ 群里出现的原因其实很简单，就是没有人聊 Windsys Project 了 甚至有几次我发了关于 Windsys 的内容，他们还是继续聊他们的话题，所有人都把我无视了 那能怎么办呢？我总不能出来 at 全员说：“你们必须要聊我、必须要聊 Windsys Project”这样的话吧？ 都没有人聊我、我的项目了，那我还呆着干嘛？就拉进群助手不看了呗 这下答案就显而易见了，是谁切割谁呢？ 本来是不想新建任何交流群的，因为每一个交流群最终都不会聊该群最原本的话题（懂的人应该懂我的意思） 但是没有了交流群你就无法更好地去了解你的东西，所以还是建了个 TG 群 现在的 TG 群氛围我还挺喜欢的，…
👍58😢9🥱3❤2
忙完后回来补了个觉才看到大家的评论留言，看到了几位老面孔的同时，评论内容也让我非常感动，但好像。。。是不是有点被理解歪了？ 非常抱歉，我的文笔可能不太好，导致最后一篇后记写得有点冗长难以理解，因为我想表达的东西实在是太多了... 图中是我从文中截取的一部分，重点已用红线画出，下面我再尝试用通俗易懂的文字补充下： Win11 到时可能会出 24H2、25H2、26H2，Windsys 也会有 24H2、25H2、26H2，只是更新的时间无法保证是固定的。有可能下个月出了 24H2，但需要半年或是一年等我用到后才会更新。更新的也仅仅是系统版本，而不会有任何新的特性，比如多语言、多SKU之类的这些比较花里胡哨的特性。也可以理解为这个项目的灵魂已死，现在只是空有一副躯壳。 系统仍然可用，但前提是你愿意接受较长的更新周期。 不知道这样解释大伙会不会更清楚一些呢？
❤44👍2
我最大的两个项目该停止主要更新的停止，该关站的也关站，我人还没死频道还是会保留的，不过除了这两个项目的东西我也没什么想说的，也就是说想取关的大伙们可以取关了
😢18❤4
没骗你们吧
😢22😱3
#Latest10 随着 Windsys Project 的重大变化，Latest10 从即日起将关闭，相关说明已发布到 Latest10 网站上。 https://latest10.win
😢23
#Windsys 深受各位喜爱并且已用于多种生产环境的第三方社区 Windows 系统已更新。 Windows 11 23H2 Owari Windows 10 22H2 Kessoku Windows 11 23H2 (Like LTSC) Oat Windows 10 LTSC Kessoku (19044.4170) [2024.04] 是时候停下来了 与此同时向大家宣布一则项目的重大变化： Windsys Project 将无限期停止新特性/新品的开发与规划，仅保留无法保证更新节奏的日常维护性更新（只更新预装软件与操作系统版本，以及修复严重性问题） Windsys Project 中的系统作品还是能正常安装使用，反馈的问题也会抽空去修复，跟现在不会有什么明显性区别，只不过是后续不会有任何能“令人耳目一新”的东西出现，也不会有任何在“系统封装圈”中与众不同的新东西出现。
😢29👍3
不要再等了，Windsys Project 要停更了，Latest10 马上也要关站了
❤19😢5
#Latest10 你也快四岁了。
👍28❤6
很符合我对你们 系统圈、PE圈、软件资源分享圈 的刻板印象
👍29😁9👏3
追踪一个异常流量来源时发现，WDControl 不是已经失效了吗，怎么那么多人还跟找到宝似的在那转来转去？
回到事件本身。 很久之前就听说过微软会替一些软件“擦屁股”，昨天试着寻找来源但没找到，正巧今天刷推特时有位微软员工的推文就推到了我脸上。 https://x.com/geniusvczh/status/1760117509079105903 微软其实可以选择不替360擦屁股，但显然360的劫持造成了不可忽视的影响，迫使微软不得不帮360去擦屁股。 例如，收到大量 explorer.exe 崩溃的反馈，经调查发现是360的问题，但用户并不觉得是360的问题，而是认为是Windows本身的问题。因此，微软只能替360擦屁股来缓解这次事件。 当然，真正的原因也就只有微软才知道。 关于360我就懒得评价了，至于火绒，从技术的角度来看，这次事件中火绒是被"冤枉"的；但是从用户的角度来看，火绒这是“误报”行为，用户才不会管什么技术不技术的，它们只知道火绒删除了他电脑的系统文件，导致电脑无法正常使用。 都影响到了生产环境了，没办法呀…
👍8
发现视频被删除了，既然上面都聊了那么多，我还是稍微说下自己的看法吧 稍微偏个题，点进去视频链接发现页面提示的是“视频内容已被UP主删除”，但是根据UP主epcdiy的说法是“遭受不可抗力”，那么是真的不可抗力吗？ 我没做过UP主，我也不知道主动删除/被动删除的提示是不是一样的，有了解的朋友可以补充下。 视频是被UP主删除的还是“遭受不可抗力”都不影响事件本身，我只是想不出来有什么理由会导致视频被“不可抗力”，就当是我个人好奇吧（笑
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @whatkch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whatk Official | 吐槽杂谈放饼” (@whatkch), 1,406 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatkch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.