Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

OZEROV

@whatisitsergey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,043subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001954174963
TypeChannel
Username@whatisitsergey
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/whatisitsergey

Growth

4,0434,0504,046.57 August 2026 — 4,050 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,048 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,045 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,043 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,042–4,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:364,043-2
11 Aug 2026, 03:054,045-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:284,048-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:324,050first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 4,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
945
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held9 (9 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total945
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 19s
Average length
1m 43s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10939.2%
10638.1%
👍3311.9%
😱72.52%
🤯62.16%
👌41.44%
🕊31.08%
🤪31.08%
🍌20.719%
👀20.719%
💘10.36%
🤔10.36%
🥴10.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @whatisitsergey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC945 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Что ж! Опенсорс уровня Seedance 2? Flux 3: 20 секунд 720p Русский липсинг Нот бэд Форма на ранний доступ, но скоро уже станет доступно везде - https://tally.so/r/44d9NX

🔥197🤯6😱1

25 Jun 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,870 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Превиз в Blender как референс для Seedance 2 – самый подконтрольный рабочий процесс, после live action + ИИ. Это способ контролировать камеру и персонажей, а не итерировать промптинг. То есть видео генератор, как верхний слой рендера Идея старая, video-to-video мы умели и раньше. Но с Seedance оно будто вышло на новый уровень консистентности Теперь по шагам, как это вообще собирается Ходьба, прыжки, удары – что уго

🔥1611🤔1

23 Jun 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,230 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

720 to 4K в Seedance 2 Взял я генерацию в 720 и хотел понять на сколько хорошо она преобразиться в 4K, если закинуть ее в качестве видео-референса. Сделал 2 попытки и результат получился очень плохой. Пробовал и длинный подробный промпт и короткий. В промптах было все что нужно сохранить и не трогать, то есть посыл, что необходимо все в точности повторить, как на референсном видео Получается я масштабировал артефак

13🔥9👍4

16 Jun 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,220 views23 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

«Главная проблема Нолана» — классное эссе про режиссера Кристофера Нолана и его фирменный стиль Несколько мыслей из видео, которые зацепили и мои вопросы исходя из них: — Нолан обожает ручную камеру и может оставить в фильме случайный дубль, если он выглядит живым. Он не гонится за стерильной идеальностью. Разве не этого мы пытаемся добиться, добавляя в промпты film grain или handheld? — Его первый фильм стоил $600

14🔥5👍3💘1

14 Jun 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,170 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подборка материалов от меня — для тех, кто пропустил последние полторы недели Как один талантливый человек с ноутбуком уделал весь российский кинопром (по версии комментаторов) Как через микро-режиссуру управлять блокингом сцены У кого лучший каст из имидж-моделей? Самый безумный создатель миров или почему его называют новым Джорджем Лукасом эпохи ИИ-кинематографа Движение камеры всегда должно «служить истории»

👍108👌4🕊3

13 Jun 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,110 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Где это посмотреть?» Неделю назад выложил пост в threads с трейлером от PJ Ace на будущий гибридный художественный фильмом – Nexus Мой пост набрал 1,1 млн охвата и я захотел проанализировать, что вообще люди пишут и какая реакция. Запустил агента, которого я вайбкодил, когда делал тоже самое с концепт-трейлером Павла Жигарева про Гагарина Гипотеза, повторно подтверждается, чтобы протестировать концепцию мира/исто

14🔥6😱2🥴1

12 Jun 2026, 12:24 UTC≈2,000 views35 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Собрал конкурсы и фестивали ИИ-кино, куда прямо сейчас можно нести свои работы Future Vision XPRIZE – 3-минутный трейлер оптимистичного сай-фая + тритмент. Гран-при $2.6M (включая $2.5M на производство полного метра). Дедлайн 15 августа. https://futurevisionxprize.com AAIFF в Астане — фонд $1,000,000, подача бесплатная. Тематическая секция ($450K за первое место) и открытая — для уже готовых работ. От 3 минут, англ

🔥25👍62👀2

10 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,180 views46 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Этого самоучку из Китая разыскивали ИИ-студии Вы же видели его вирусную работу Zombie Scavenger? Создал за 10 дней, вложил примерно 400 долларов и получил около 100млн охвата по всем площадкам и перепостам. Фанаты называют его китайским «Любовь, смерть и роботы» Mx-Shell фотограф без кинообразования. Только любопытство и чувство вкуса. Сейчас его концепт превращают в оригинальную игру Zombie Scavenger Он разложил

🔥2911😱4🍌2

9 Jun 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,160 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Движение камеры всегда должно «служить истории» И в продолжение поста про микро-режиссуру в Seedance 2 вот пример, как можно вести камеру по нужной траектории. Этот операторский прием называется трекинг-шотом Можно попробовать использовать, когда нужно познакомить с локацией, как в примере. Или раскрывать сторителлинг через детали интерьера, когда например мы медленно скользим по столу – видим пустые бутылки, переп

26👍10🤪3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @whatisitsergey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 467,757 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OZEROV” (@whatisitsergey), 4,043 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatisitsergey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.