Posted without readable text
❤31👍9🔥3🤝3

Channel
@weshouldtob
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,830subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002397286943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weshouldtob |
| Description | 我是微书,忙起来靠得住的生意小助理。 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weshouldtob |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:22 | 7,830 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,406 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 636 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 493 | 35.1% | |
| 🔥 | 116 | 8.25% | |
| 👌 | 77 | 5.48% | |
| 🤝 | 43 | 3.06% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 2.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,406 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @weshouldtob. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2025 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤31👍9🔥3🤝3
🚀 祝 Telegram 13周年快乐,凭 13年 可前往 微书,激活 13天 会员!
❤22👌7👍5🤝4
1️⃣3️⃣ Telegram turns 13 today. For over half that time — the past 7,5 years — it's been one of the 10 most downloaded mobile apps in the world. A whole generation has grown up with it 💪 🎂 Happy birthday, Telegram!
❤5👍2
Posted without readable text
👍14❤7🔥4
Posted without readable text
❤21👍4👌3🤝1
🚪 刚刚收到一笔用户误转入的 3000 USDT,款项已于第一时间原路退回。 借此提醒所有用户: 转账前请务必核对收款地址及链路(TRC20/ERC20),建议先小额测试,如发生误转请第一时间携 TXID 联系客服处理。
❤55👍44👌21🤝2
🆕 Telegram 重大更新 现在无需开通 Telegram 会员即可将微书链接到个人账户。 同时,链接机器人的入口已由原先的 Telegram 企业版迁移至“编辑我的资料”聊天机器人中。
👍18❤14🔥7🙏2
😉 微书上线快两年了。从最初那个只会记账的小机器人,到今天能扛下各种生意场景的小助理,一路走来,离不开各位老板的照顾与支持。没有大家的厚爱,微书走不到这里。 作为一个聚集了这么多行业老板的机器人,不做点什么……,好像说不过去。 🍵 这两年看下来,大家做生意最缺的从来不是流量,而是信得过的资源。找合作、找上游、找靠谱的合伙人——圈子就这么大,一次踩雷的成本,往往比半年广告费还贵。微书能帮你把账算清楚,但算不清楚的,是人与人之间那本账。 👓 所以今天借这个机会,跟大家介绍我们团队的另一个项目,前排 前排是一个专门做 Telegram 生态测评的平台。说白了,它让真实用户的评价沉淀下来,让做得好的被更多人看见,也让浑水摸鱼的无处遁形。对在微书里踏实做生意的老板来说,前排更像是一扇"对外的门面":你的频道几分、别人的频道几分,一目了然。 前排 @qianpai @ceping 🕶️ 好生意,值得被更多人看见。欢迎来前排,给自己…
❤33👍7🤝7🔥5
🌌 频道宇宙 · Channel Universe 每一个频道都是一颗星球,能量在星球间流动,宇宙因此诞生。 🌠 点击探索宇宙全貌,打开星图 有人做过一个实验:只要找到你认识的人,让他再找他认识的人……平均只需要 6 步,你就能联系上世界上任何一个人。 😏 频道也是一样。 你的订阅者里,总有人也是频道主。 他们再分享,再传递…… 就这样一层一层,数十万订阅的大频道,终将出现在这张星图上。 🫵 我们的目标只有一个:让每一个活跃的 Telegram 频道,都出现在这张星图上。 现在,宇宙正在诞生,你的频道可以是最早的那颗星。🫣 如果你也有公开频道,生成你的星球,让更多人发现你!
🔥74❤50👍47👌4
👓 近期我们注意到,原本使用率较低的企业版“名片”功能,出现了明显的使用增长。然而,这一增长伴随着严重偏离功能初衷的使用行为。 该功能于2024年12月提出并上线,其设计初衷在于为企业提供统一的品牌展示窗口,从而增强企业形象与专业度。考虑到企业版本身具有较高的使用门槛,我们在设计之初并未充分预判到可能出现的滥用情况。 遗憾的是,当前已有部分用户通过反复注册企业试用(7天免费机制)以实现“无限续用”。更为严重的是,一些用户在企业名片中刻意添加“官方认证”“上押”等具有误导性的字样,存在明显的欺诈风险。 在此郑重提醒:凡是在企业名片中出现“官方认证”“上押”等引导性、暗示性表述的,均可视为高风险行为,请务必提高警惕,谨防受骗。 鉴于当前版本正处于迭代开发阶段,暂无法立即从机制层面彻底修复该问题,但我们将采取人工审核与处理措施。现给予3天整改期:❌ 自2026年4月14日起,如仍发现企业名片存在滥用或违规行为,将直接执行永久封禁处…
❤10👍6🔥3👌2
🎆 骏马奔腾辞旧岁,春风送暖启新程。马年已至,愿大家在新的一年里事业策马扬鞭、一路领先;生活顺遂安康、万事如意;财运滚滚而来,福气常伴左右。愿每一份努力都有收获,每一次前行都有回响,马到成功,所愿皆成。 💖 为感谢大家一路以来的支持与陪伴,特别送上会员卡密: 马上有礼 请前往 开通会员 - 激活卡密 处激活 🔥 祝大家马年大吉,阖家欢乐,万事胜意。
❤23👍5🔥3👌1🤝1
😰 抱歉各位,微书今晚8点半左右发生宕机,持续约 2 小时,目前已全面恢复正常。 针对此次事件,我们已第一时间将所有节点配置升级至当前架构条件下的最高规格,以应对后续可能出现的攻击。在旧架构限制下,这是目前能够采取的最稳妥措施。 🤯 此次攻击来得突然,也暴露了我们在极端场景下的不足。尽管过去已多次应对攻击、并持续进行架构升级,且系统稳定运行了近 3 个月,但攻击手段仍在不断演进,我们未能完全防范,责任在我们。 任何解释都无法掩盖这次服务中断带来的影响,对此我们深表歉意。也恳请大家再给微书一次机会——新版本在稳定性与功能性上均有大幅提升,我们会以更高的标准,持续改进,避免类似问题再次发生。
❤40👍18🙏9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @weshouldtob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“微书 通知” (@weshouldtob), 7,830 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weshouldtob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.