这不是躺平,这是赚够了提前退休啊。表达思路清晰,谈吐平和顺畅,听着很舒服,技术又过硬,完全是大佬级别。 说是运气完全是自谦,早期各种努力,就是在准备完全的情况下,当机会出现时能够抓住。其实一生中能抓住几次机会就足以改变人生了——看完后的感受,很鸡汤,但实际就是如此。 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1kvMe6dEVb/

Channel
为也行
@weiyexing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,632subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277540926 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weiyexing |
| Created | 3 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weiyexing |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 5,632 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 5,628 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 5,619 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 5,617 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 5,617 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.8%
- avg views ÷ 5,632 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,340
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.297%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (7 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,847 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 35.5% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 32.3% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 14.5% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣2
申请中译中 我非常喜欢使用 AI。每天早上,我都会打开 VS Code(微软大战代码)或者 PyCharm(蟒蛇魅力),从 GitHub(代码枢纽)拉取项目,再启动 Cursor(光标)、Fork(代码叉)和 Claude Code(克劳德代码),帮助我完成 Python(蟒蛇编程语言)的开发。 简单的问题交给 DeepSeek-V4-Flash(深度探索第四代闪光版),复杂一点的就请 ChatGPT-5.6 Sun(聊天生成预训练变换器第五点六代太阳版)、Claude 5 Sonnet(克劳德第五代十四行诗)和 Gemini 3.6 Flash(双子座第三点六代闪光版)一起研究,实在没有思路还可以问问 Nano Banana(纳米香蕉 / 此处为搞笑编造的名词)。 它们通过 API(应用程序编程接口)请求访问 URL(统一资源定位符),在 context(上下文)中读取 prompt(提示词),输出 token(词元)。…
❤1🤨1
#感觉中文要完蛋了
我认识你,永远记得你 热、黏稠的東興
🤩3
翻译的问题太多了,以至于影响到了阅读。让我意外的是,这本译作竟然还广受赞誉,我无法理解。 ——蒲隆译作《约翰生传》
❤1
夏之末😭
❤1
https://fixupx.com/jeffdean/status/2085034604172603724 那个出现在很多传记的传奇人物离开谷歌了
读完了,挺喜欢的,从极端案件去探寻家庭、社会层面的问题,就像附录中提到,这是一个非典型的案件,因为弑母非常罕见,但背后的凸显出来的社会问题又是典型的……印象比较深的是,谢天琴的身世真的悲剧,父亲在大运动期间被打为右派,自戳双目以证清白,后被张罗娶了一个盲女,诞下长女谢天琴,后续还陆续生了一对子女,无法想象盲人夫妇如何养育三个孩子。在这样的环境下长大,谢天琴的性格敏感封闭也就不足为奇了。 然而,由于这个案件的当事人(吴谢宇)无法接受采访,而他的父母均已不在,谢天琴的家人拒绝采访,因此,书中谢天琴的形象,是通过她的书信、同事、朋友和吴家人的描述树立起来的,定然是有失偏颇,这也是遗憾之一了。 即使读下来,也无法得出「为什么」的答案,不过,很多事情并不是一定会有答案的。
最近看到之前订阅的吴谢宇弑母案件的书《人性的深渊:吴谢宇案》上架了,又想起了之前这个播客,播客聊的就是这个案件和这本书。
是谁的保密发货发到公司了😁😁
😁3❤1🤩1🤯1
又看到了这个案件,很压抑。这对夫妻在临死之际在想什么,是恐惧,还是悔恨?是否会后悔一开始没有拼死反抗。 前段时间和同事聊到《进击的巨人》,他说不喜欢,理由是结局很离谱。我说我恰恰相反,我觉得最后艾伦的选择很符合他,他做了无悔的选择。 我的理由是,从第一季开始,用了很多剧情铺垫,例如女巨人篇,他没有按自己的想法早早变身,导致利威尔班等许多同伴牺牲,后续还有类似的剧情,不断地固化「他没有做出选择/做了错误的选择/把选择权交给别人」而导致的悲剧。 因此,结局就是他选择的,这就是他的人设,可以评论他残忍自私,但这就是剧情不断演绎出来的人。 回到这个案件,对我的启示就是,无论如何,什么事都要尽力去做无悔的选择。
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @weiyexing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“为也行” (@weiyexing), 5,632 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weiyexing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.