Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

22/11 - Координаты своих

@we_are_2211

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,391subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002755721400
TypeChannel
Username@we_are_2211
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/we_are_2211

Growth

1,3911,3951,3936 August 2026 — 1,395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,395 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,393 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,390–1,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:391,391-2
9 Aug 2026, 14:161,393-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:501,395no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:051,395first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 1,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
679
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held8 (8 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,716
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈367 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итоги полугодия на рынке площадок под девелопмент По данным CORE.XP, в первом полугодии инвестиции в площадки под жильё выросли на 22% год к году. При этом количество сделок сократилось с 50 до 39, а средний чек вырос с 1,8 до 2,8 млрд рублей. По нашей оценке, обеспечила его не Москва - в столице объём сделок с площадками остался примерно на уровне прошлого года с прогнозом на снижение. В нашем бэклоге по Москве 4

29 Jul 2026, 08:26 UTC≈596 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Предпринимательская выносливость - умение разжигать запал столько раз, сколько потребуется. Мы сейчас много говорим о рынке с инвесторами и землевладельцами, даём комментарии профильным изданиям. Информационный фон вокруг девелопмента непростой, и постоянное присутствие в нём незаметно оставляет осадок. Между тем одним из главных факторов успеха в таком рынке становится способность гореть идеей тогда, когда другие в

21 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈857 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вопреки статистике: чему предприниматель может научиться у футболистов. Завершился чемпионат мира. В финале на поле выходят двадцать два игрока. За каждым из них - тысячи тех, кто был не менее талантлив, но не дошёл. Недавно разговаривал с одним известным футболистом. В разговоре меня поразило, что он не объясняет успех только талантом. Гораздо чаще говорил об уверенности, выдержке и выносливости, удаче и способнос

17 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC≈896 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рынок Москвы сжимается и дорожает. Это новая нормальность За полугодие в Москве продано на 27% меньше метров, чем год назад, а денежный объём рынка сократился только на 13%. Разницу обеспечили рост цен и смещение продаж в более дорогие сегменты. Рынок не просто просел - изменилась его конструкция. Сильнее всего это проявилось в комфорте: минус 40% в проданных метрах и ни одного нового проекта внутри МКАД за полугод

15 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC≈748 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С 22|11 всё началось с совпадения в названии. Мы создали «22/11 Девелопмент» и вскоре узнали, что в России уже есть косметический бренд с тем же числом в имени. Затем его основатель Тигран пришёл на встречу с нашими подписчиками. Так началось знакомство, которое переросло в сотрудничество. Но рассказать о 22|11 мы решили не из-за названия. Они вышли в сегмент с сильными международными игроками, и не стали никого к

10 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈872 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @urbanhub_live

⏹ В продолжение обсуждения с экспертами: 📢 Александр Канивец, сооснователь и операционный директор «22/11 Девелопмент»: Я бы не драматизировал: зеленый стандарт сам по себе не обязан резко повышать цену квадратного метра. На базовом уровне это во многом то, что сильный девелопер и так должен делать: энергоэффективность, доступная среда, нормальная инженерия, двор, инфраструктура. То есть условная «бронза» — это скор

10 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈873 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для Urban Hub рассказали, почему массовый переход к новым зеленым стандартам невозможен без изменений в проектном финансировании, банковских продуктах и эксплуатации зданий. Делимся материалом⬇️

8 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈938 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как выбрать район с потенциалом роста Когда мы выбираем земельные участки для новых проектов, мы смотрим не только на район «здесь и сейчас». Нам важнее другое: что с этой территорией будет через несколько лет. Этой логикой мы и делимся с вами - она пригодится, когда вы выбираете ЖК для жизни или инвестиций. Внутри компании такая оценка сложнее: там десятки параметров, документы, расчёты, градостроительные ограничен

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @we_are_2211. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 850,423 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“22/11 - Координаты своих” (@we_are_2211), 1,391 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/we_are_2211.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.