Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кристина Романова | Инфографика | Дизайн карточек

Channel

Кристина Романова | Инфографика | Дизайн карточек

@wb_romanova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,835subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001580155743
TypeChannel
Username@wb_romanova
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wb_romanova

Growth

1,8351,8631,8497 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,858 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,857 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,854 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,847 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,842 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,835 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,831–1,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 09:341,835-7
23 Aug 2026, 16:191,842-5
20 Aug 2026, 07:341,847-7
17 Aug 2026, 09:451,854-3
13 Aug 2026, 17:471,857-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:331,858-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:311,861-2
7 Aug 2026, 20:471,863no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:311,863first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 7 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9959.3%
4426.3%
😍158.98%
💯74.19%
👌10.599%
🥰10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 23 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jan 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,600 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Две яркие обложки для фитолампы 🌱 Сделали две сочные, контрастные обложки под один товар Обе рабочие, обе цепляют - но настроение и акценты разные... И вот вечный вопрос: делать одну «идеальную» или тестировать и смотреть, что зайдёт рынку? Я за тесты!!! Потому что угадывать можно долго, а цифры всё расставляют по местам ❔ Какой вариант выбрали бы вы? 1️⃣ или 2️⃣ — пишите 👇 Задать вопрос | Этапы работы | Стоим

🔥114👌1😍1

21 Jan 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,310 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Моя любимая рубрика 😌 1 фото со склада → полноценная воронка слайдов На входе - одна единственная фотография вакууматора, даже не на белом фоне, в плохом качестве Дальше была долгая и местами сложная работа: продумать логику, сценарии использования, акценты, смыслы. Собрать воронку так, чтобы покупатель понял товар и захотел его!!! Было непросто, честно Но по итогу кажется, что получилось очень даже круто 🔥 Ка

🔥173💯3😍1

19 Jan 2026, 10:48 UTC≈1,100 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Я не только про инфографику 😉 Часто думают, что я делаю только карточки На самом деле — нет) ⏺ Объявления для Avito, ⏺ баннеры, ⏺ этикетки, упаковки, ⏺ логотипы и другие дизайн-задачи с этим я тоже работаю и умею 💬 Если нужен не просто «красивый макет», а дизайн с логикой и смыслом, то пишите, обсудим 👀 Задать вопрос | Этапы работы | Стоимость | Портфолио | Группа для селлеров |Заполнить бриф Если остались во

8🔥5💯2😍2

17 Jan 2026, 10:36 UTC998 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Только нейросеть. И ничего больше ❕ На старте у заказчика было: 💬 фото товара на белых листиках 💬 и всё. Вообще всё 🙂 Запрос: максимально показать товар в действии, видоизменить карточки, создать понятную инструкцию и т.д.... Дальше началась магия… ну как магия — Freepik, тысячи генераций и много часов работы 😅 Пробовали разные сцены, ракурсы, свет, окружение Многое улетало в корзину, потому что «ну ваще не то»

🔥14😍43🥰1

15 Jan 2026, 10:28 UTC866 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ Новые проекты в студию 🔔 Декабрь вышел очень продуктивным Настолько, что я благополучно забросила адвент-календарь 😅 Не потому что «лень» или «перегорела», а потому что сил реально не оставалось ни на что, кроме работы И знаете что? Это нормально В какой-то момент я поймала себя на мысли, что веду блог на автомате: надо постить, надо придумывать, надо поддерживать активность А по факту - я просто не успевала п

🔥212😍2💯1

13 Jan 2026, 10:17 UTC784 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺Как нормально использовать Pinterest, а не просто залипать 👀 Pinterest - это огромный источник вдохновения Но вопрос в другом: ты реально его используешь или просто листаешь? Частая ситуация: сидишь без клиентов, думаешь «чем бы заняться», но вместо того чтобы прокачать скилл или сделать что-то новое - ждёшь чудо… с двумя работами в портфолио 🙃 Спойлер: чудо обычно не приходит 📍 Сразу важный момент: использовать

🔥197😍2💯1

7 Dec 2025, 13:02 UTC≈1,320 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏺ День 5 | Advent | 20 полезных плагинов Figma. Часть 2 Подборка классных плагинов, которые точно упростят вашу дизайнерскую жизнь 🩷 Наберем 100🔥? Задать вопрос | Этапы работы | Стоимость | Портфолио | Группа для селлеров |Заполнить бриф Если остались вопросы - напишите мне) Спасибо за доверие!

17🔥12😍3

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @wb_romanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 119,495 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кристина Романова | Инфографика | Дизайн карточек” (@wb_romanova), 1,835 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wb_romanova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.