Channel
@wawaxiaochou0517
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,164subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003964356683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wawaxiaochou0517 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wawaxiaochou0517 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
3,780 average views per post against 3,164 subscribers — an engagement rate of 119.4%. Across the 2,355 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,990 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 2.67% and 19.2%, with a median of 8.16%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 15 of 15 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 56,670 |
| Mature posts only | 119.4% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 3,164 measured 10 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:zho · 2,355 channels · p10 0.77% · p25 2.67% · p50 8.16% · p75 19.2% · p90 38.6% |
| Position in cohort | 99.193th percentile · 14.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.093% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 3,164 | +66 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 3,098 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 3,095 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56,670 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 94.4% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#南城 #萝莉 小心愿 600p 🈶🐍🈶69 用户名： @xxy432 频道： https://t.me/xff103 妹妹年龄：07广西表妹 由于爱师说我太短了，那就在爱师的鼓励下稍微变长一点😡 评论：再返小心愿，今日穿搭如图所示，双马尾搭配一身jk加嗨丝加双新买的标志物兔兔拖孩。 半月未见，肾是想念，开门依旧躲在门后，“蛙哥，是你呀”（我就知道，哥布林又被遗忘了，争取下辈子投胎有皮皮一半帅😭）付完水费，偷了爱师麦丽素吃，边听她讲假期发生的趣事，寒暄完后脱衣共浴，来几回了，没第一回那么腼腆了，尝试帮爱师洗澡（才不是我好色捏，就爱洗妹妹胸前圆滚滚的巨物🥰）洗净擦干，让爱师穿上jk，也是第一回尝试皮肤款，嗯，别有一番风味，后续正戏就不细写啦，依旧大蟒🐍do感佳，非常爱笑的一位妹妹，好吃爱吃😋依旧是开，有空就返👅 优缺点详见
❤5
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
#南城 #嫩妹 晚晚 700p 🈶🐍🈶69 用户名： @wanwan1685 频道：https://t.me/wanwan52199 自由评论：160± 45± 🐻A+—B ，大葡萄，黄皮重庆妹妹，频道人照7分左右，黄皮版，右手小臂有小面积纹身，腿型蛮好看，脚有红色美甲，屁股有点肉肉，为人比较温柔挺爱笑，但不会主动找话题，一问一答吧 服务方面：洗吹做三件套+🐍+69（有点咸，无异味）+舔咪，口活无齿感，但有待加强，有自备漱口水和情趣套装，顺从任盘，屁股有点肉肉，do感佳，会主动喊爸爸/哥哥，在一声声爸爸叫声中，小弟又是不争气的123出水🥰 缺点：1.奈奈偏小，劝退匈奴党 2.东江懂得都懂，浴室小，水溅到客厅，我又差点摔了，迟早死在东江 3.小面积纹身，抽烟，但没闻到烟味 适合嫩妹🐍教党
❤1
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
#大朗 #嫩妹 酷洛米 800p（报告-100） （已跑路） 🈶🐍 用户名： @kuromiouo 频道：https://t.me/kuromiouo1 妹妹年龄： 08（刚下水） 温馨提示（依旧叠甲保命） 自由评论：160± 45± 🐻A+—B 黄皮，由于头课，只上了个底，人照6 7分吧，妆后可能好看些，手和脚均有美甲（适合部分手/足控🥰） 服务方面：初下水，很多服务不懂，没口（有待大哥调教了）大蟒🐍，会伸舌头，反正我是全靠🐍硬的。。。doi过程顺从任盘，水多，紧度适中，进门算时间，穿着jk迎客，服务不到位会say sorry（看来小弟还是太包容了）只能说有待调教吧，值6 缺点：没口（初下水，小弟能理解，有待调教） 奈奈偏小，黄皮，极小面积纹身（好朋友的英文名） 未化妆中颜（代聊沟通不到位啊，通知太晚了）遗憾未见妆后样貌啊 适合吃嫩/蟒🐍党，劝退匈奴党 果然啊，头水还是吃亏哇，有待各位调教了🥰
❤7
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
#大朗 #嫩妹 萌兔兔 700p 🈶🐍🈶69 用户名： @mtt123998 频道：https://t.me/mtt1314520 年龄：06湖北妹妹 温馨提示（依旧叠甲保命） 自由评论：160± 40± 🐻A—A+ 跟视频人照8-9分，白皮全身偏粉嫩，皮肤细腻滑溜，胸前有个蝴蝶纹身，声音很小很温柔，人工白虎，手和脚均有美甲（适合某些手控/足控🥰） 服务：嫩妹洗吹做三件套+🐍+69（无异味）doi过程顺从任盘，叫声自然，传教会用腿勾住小弟老弱病残的腰，下面紧致，do感佳 缺点：口活稍欠缺，奈奈偏小，有小面积的纹身 适合喜欢白皮/嫩妹/白虎/🐍教党，劝退匈奴党，总体好评好吃😈
❤3
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
@cz773355 coco ID别问啦别问啦，上图是老师发给我的，不是我的，我软短小优质123，没吃上本来就气啦，不要造谣我啦😠😠😠
❤1
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
天公不作美，我恨大屌哥
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
今天遇到个装机
❤1
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
装到了，现在好痛哦
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
本频道是小弟和清风哥 @g7931（工作原因暂无空更新）的出击日记，内容也仅供参考，小弟尽量客观的写，但多多少少都会带点主观😳 小弟偏好嫩妹/小只马/能🐍的多些，最不吃的就是情绪价值（虚伪的客套话） 小弟是优质123（所以催不催钟/耐不耐桩还请不要问我🥰） ❗️最后还请各位大哥不要听信狼友们的吹捧，我就一小卡拉米，玩的少，大部分也没去过，也不权威，请勿盲目跟车，更不要来都来了，谢谢！🥰
❤6
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
#南城 #嫩妹 小萌 700p 🈶🐍🈶69 用户名： @xjie1688 频道：https://t.me/xjie8898 妹妹年龄：08 自由评论：老实说一开始看上榜照，不是小弟的菜，拖了蛮久才来，但实际见到本人后，这想法彻底打消😂中颜，但本人会比上榜照好看不少，160+/ 90 🐻B，黄偏白皮，全身粉粉嫩嫩的，搭配那一抹腮红青春气息拉满，皮肤细腻光滑，屁屁肉肉弹性好，🈚纹身不抽烟，手和脚都挺好看，均有美甲（适合某些手控，足控了🥰） 服务方面:正常洗吹做三件套，蟒🐍+69（无异味）+舔咪，在嫩妹里服务属上乘，自备漱口水和情趣套装，陪洗认真，动作不做作，人如其名小萌 小萌：洗澡时含着漱口水，量水温嗯 嗯指了指花洒，再比个ok，嗯嗯？ 小弟也跟着模仿起来：嗯 嗯，ok😘 下面包裹感挺足，叫声自然，doi反馈佳 缺点：对小弟来说，属实想不到啥缺点了，硬要说可能颜值中等和奶奶偏小（够用）但白皮粉嫩搭配软萌的动作，完全抵消了呀，…
❤11🤮2
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
#南城 #御姐 #靓排骨 贝贝 700p 🈶浅🐍🈶69 用户名： @beibei72188 频道：https://t.me/beibeinbvgj998 年龄：没问，23左右吧 自由评论：人照有8.5，但肯定没视频这么好看咯，黄皮，170± 90左右，腿长纤细，🐻A—A+，人很健谈，资深老师，自述23年底下海，tg玩的比我6，跟我讲tg莞朴发展史😳 对贝贝老师有点印象，但之前好像没🐍所以一直没来，最近炸号开🐍了就来尝尝咸淡，能浅🐍能69（无异味，但69后只能kiss kiss咯） 服务方面：正常洗吹做三件套+舔咪+舔蛋+🐍+69，陪洗认真，洗完还会帮忙擦身，第一天搬到东江来开，可能觉得隔音不咋滴，干啥都小心翼翼的，感觉像在偷情😘下面紧致（开的少的原因？还是靓排骨都这样哦🥰）反正小弟是女上123出水了🥰 缺点：皮肤稍差，奈奈偏小劝退匈奴党，69后不能🐍吻，只能kiss 适合腿控颜值党，单说脸还是挺好看的，穿个黑丝也是蛮
❤6
Signed Hachiman （迷茫🐸🐸）
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @wawaxiaochou0517. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 57,527 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“我爱出击（蛙🤡附体版）” (@wawaxiaochou0517), 3,164 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wawaxiaochou0517.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.