13 Sept 2024, 09:58 UTCviews —
water pinned «the score from 1st phase was converted into a multiplier for 2nd phase. everyone starts with 100. but early birds from 1st phase have a progression advantage. good luck.»
Channel
water
@water_ton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
53,741subscribers
-322 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002134049531 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @water_ton |
| Description | wait and see |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 18 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/water_ton |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 53,741 | -55 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 53,796 | -47 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 53,843 | -46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 53,889 | -56 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 53,945 | -42 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 53,987 | -37 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 54,024 | -39 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 54,063 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
10 Sept 2024, 13:38 UTC≈28,000 viewsread 14 August 2026
each referral boosts your production. reach the top. no one reached the prestige yet. t.me/water_ton_bot/water
9 Sept 2024, 09:52 UTC≈31,500 viewsread 14 August 2026
the score from 1st phase was converted into a multiplier for 2nd phase. everyone starts with 100. but early birds from 1st phase have a progression advantage. good luck.
8 Sept 2024, 11:25 UTC≈32,100 viewsread 14 August 2026
t.me/water_ton_bot/water
31 Jul 2024, 15:17 UTC≈36,100 viewsread 14 August 2026
water. ready?
21 Jul 2024, 07:36 UTC≈56,900 viewsread 14 August 2026
it is almost there.
2 Jul 2024, 08:31 UTC≈77,400 viewsread 14 August 2026
you liked the score progression in the first phase. will you like the progression in the second one? water miniapp coming out this month.
26 Jun 2024, 09:46 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
26 Jun 2024, 09:16 UTC≈84,900 viewsread 14 August 2026
july.
23 Jun 2024, 12:50 UTC≈95,900 viewsread 14 August 2026
you will not have to click stupidly on the screen. it is going to be something unique. you have not seen this on telegram yet.
16 Jun 2024, 17:34 UTC≈140,000 viewsread 14 August 2026
water. ready?
28 Apr 2024, 13:13 UTC≈220,000 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll
Exclude those who had suspicious activity and was inviting bots? (This might randomly affect you too)
- Yes36%
- No64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @water_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
28 Apr 2024, 13:13 UTCFinal Results36,700 voters approx.
Exclude those who had suspicious activity and was inviting bots? (This might randomly affect you too)
- Yes36%
- No64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2024 to 13 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,286,451 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“water” (@water_ton), 53,741 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/water_ton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.