Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Осторожно, ГАЗ!

@warninggas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,524subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001353669751
TypeChannel
Username@warninggas
Created23 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/warninggas

Growth

2,5242,5292,526.56 August 2026 — 2,529 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,529 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,527 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,523–2,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:242,524-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:322,527-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:162,529no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:542,529first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

722 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁23833.0%
🤔22731.4%
👍618.45%
🔥527.20%
👏415.68%
💩385.26%
243.32%
🤮223.05%
👎101.39%
😴50.693%
🤓20.277%
🤯20.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 722reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,500 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤔31🔥73😁3🤓2

7 Jan 2026, 16:50 UTC≈4,560 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мадуро, баркас с нефтью... Леонтьев всё знал, как Жириновский... "Выпьем за морфлот.. как блестят сейчас твои глаза"..

😁17

1 Jan 2026, 04:07 UTC≈4,250 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знаете, что?! Мы хотим в свои деревни. И по хую, что выродки пообщали выродкам. В прямом смысле, выродки выродкам. Пусть выбирают каких выродков быть не должно.

🤔32👏13👍4😁3🤯1😴1

31 Dec 2025, 18:33 UTC≈3,330 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/YYb4h8U7Ljw?si=r5nIr8w8TySdj8yl

👍10🔥7

3 Dec 2025, 19:15 UTC≈3,510 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Докладываем о ходе переговоров по мирному урегулированию "А я не пошел... я пошел на рыбылку.. закинул.. клюеет"

😁25👏8💩3🔥1🤔1

2 Dec 2025, 21:06 UTC≈3,100 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возвращение За лужного from across the pond Самое время кому-то перевернуть доску. Зеленскому бы лучше избегать тоннелей и ходить с именным стаканчиком, как некоторые.

🤔18😁42👍2🤮2💩1

2 Dec 2025, 20:50 UTC≈2,730 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/wGqvWDuvQv8?si=Y96TEMJQ3Yy_FKf1

🔥12🤮4😴2👏1

20 Nov 2025, 21:08 UTC≈3,760 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Атлант насупил сфинктор С 1 по 17 декабря ждите хлопок ИИ пузыря. Строго говоря, это уже давно не пузырь, а хрен свисающий со лба, который сдувают с верхней губы как могут. За ним последует страховой и банковский. Начало "величественой депрессия" одним словом. Империи распадаются не потому, что "говорящая биомасса" недовольна. А потому, что "как есть" не удовлетворяет и уже не может, или не сможет удовлетворять кри

🤔45🤮8👍74🔥3😁2

24 Oct 2025, 22:38 UTC≈4,590 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всю картину описывать не будем. Будет как аналитик имени Галыгина. Но Евросоюзникам пора бы готовить скамейку запасных для Зеленского. Слишком уж он жирная священная корова. Такую тяжело создать и легко потерять. Генерал очевидность OSINTного гнезда проекта "Остроожно Газ"

🤔21👍10👎3💩3🔥3🤮1😴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @warninggas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,136,512 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Осторожно, ГАЗ!” (@warninggas), 2,524 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warninggas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.