Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for wap.ac

Channel

wap.ac

@wap_ac

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,205subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206645796
TypeChannel
Username@wap_ac
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wap_ac

Growth

3,1953,2053,2007 August 2026 — 3,202 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,201 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,203 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,204 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,197 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,195 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,202 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,203 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,205 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,194–3,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:163,205+2
27 Aug 2026, 14:363,203+1
24 Aug 2026, 09:533,202+7
20 Aug 2026, 13:563,195-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:383,197-7
14 Aug 2026, 05:473,204+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:313,203+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:063,201-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:303,202no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:153,202first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 3,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
589
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 January 20267 August 2026)
Views total589
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩9344.7%
👎3818.3%
👍2210.6%
199.13%
👏73.37%
👌62.88%
😱62.88%
🖕52.40%
💔31.44%
💊20.962%
🔥20.962%
🤬20.962%
😨10.481%
🙏10.481%
🤮10.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC589 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢 KVM 系列紧急维护通知 尊敬的用户: 因近期发现与 KVM 虚拟化相关的安全风险,我们将对全部 KVM 系列产品进行停机维护与安全修复。 相关说明: https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/new-zapscape-kvm-flaw-could-let.html 📍 影响范围 所有 KVM 系列实例 🔧 维护顺序 HINET→ HK DC2 → HK PRO → HK 2PRO → HK DC6 → JP → JP PRO → TW → SG2 → US → US PRO ⏱️ 维护时长将视实际修复进度而定,维护具体时间不再另行通知。 维护期间,相关实例可能无法访问。对此带来的不便,我们深表歉意,感谢大家的理解与支持。

29 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,600 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

尊敬的用户: 为了提升香港服务器的稳定性和服务质量,我们计划于 2026 年 7 月 29 日(星期三) 对香港区域服务器进行维护。 维护时间如下: 开始时间:2026 年 7 月 29 日 12:00(北京时间) 结束时间:2026 年 7 月 30 日 00:00(北京时间) 影响范围:HK2 VPS PRO 维护期间,改区域服务器相关服务可能会出现短暂中断或访问异常,请提前做好业务安排。 本次维护预计持续约 12 小时,维护完成后服务将自动恢复。我们会尽快完成相关工作,并持续关注服务器运行状态。 由此带来的不便,敬请谅解。感谢您的支持与配合

🖕1🙏1

17 Jul 2026, 03:32 UTC≈2,730 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢 US VPS Pro 价格调整通知 尊敬的各位用户: US VPS Pro 的网络线路优化现已全部完成。为应对不断上升的运营成本并维持高质量的网络环境,我们将对该产品线的新购价格进行如下调整: 📈 价格调整: US 1G VPS Pro: $5 ➔ $10 US 2G VPS Pro: $10 ➔ $20 流量自动购买: $10 / 1TB 🛡 老用户权益: 所有存量机器的续费价格保持不变!(仅针对新购上调) 感谢大家的理解与支持。如需协助或有任何疑问,请随时联系客服团队。 Wap 运营团队

💩12🖕3😱21

7 Jul 2026, 01:58 UTC≈3,050 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ 【故障通知】台湾 EPYC VPS 网络异常说明 尊敬的用户: 目前监控到台湾 EPYC VPS 节点正遭受大面积恶意流量攻击,导致网络异常。 📍 影响范围:所有 IP 段 🛠 当前状态:技术团队已全面介入,正在紧急拦截并抢修中。 我们将密切跟进处理进度并及时同步最新情况。给您带来不便,敬请谅解!感谢您的耐心等待。 Wap 运营团队

👍43😱3🤬1

4 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,750 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢关于 US VPS Pro 线路调整及恢复的通知 尊敬的用户 感谢您一直以来对我们的信任与支持。目前,US VPS Pro 产品的网络线路调整已全面完成,服务现已恢复正常。 为了给您提供更优质、稳定的网络体验,本次调整后最新的三网路由策略如下: 中国电信 (CT):双向 CN2 GIA 中国联通 (CU):去程骨干网直连,回程 CMI2 中国移动 (CM):双向 CMI2 请您知悉上述路由变动。如在后续使用中遇到任何网络或配置问题,欢迎随时与我们联系。 Wap 运营团队

👎15👍3

1 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC≈3,030 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📢 关于 KVM 系列更换 IP 价格调整的通知 尊敬的用户: 自 Wap 成立以来,我们始终坚持以亲民的价格、稳定的服务和优秀的售后,为广大用户提供优质体验。 近期受市场环境变化影响,中国大陆地区 IP 阻断情况日益增多,相关维护与更换成本持续上升。经慎重考虑,我们将对 KVM 系列更换 IP 的价格作如下调整: 📍 **调整范围:**所有 KVM 系列 💰 **原更换价格:**2 USD/次 💰 **调整后价格:**5 USD/次 感谢您的理解与支持。我们将继续努力,为大家提供稳定、可靠的服务。 Wap 运营团队

👎15👌3🤬1

16 Jun 2026, 17:14 UTC≈3,570 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

【紧急安全通知】关于哪吒(Nezha)探针漏洞导致服务器被入侵的风险预警 哪吒(Nezha)监控面板出现大面积的安全漏洞及被黑客攻陷的情况。 大量安装了该探针的服务器被恶意控制,用于发包攻击或违规操作。为保障整体网络环境及节点服务器的安全稳定,如果您使用Nezha,请务必立即升级最新版本!并排查您的服务器是否被植入恶意程序。 来源: https://github.com/nezhahq/nezha/security/advisories/GHSA-5c25-7vpj-9mqh

20 May 2026, 14:38 UTC≈4,340 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

抱歉,因后台错误今晚抽奖没成功 时间改为: • 活动时间: 2026.05.21 20:20 (UTC+8) • 开奖截止: 2026.05.21 23:59 (UTC+8) (若有特殊情况,时间将适当延长) 其他规则不变!

💩9👏7👍2😱1

20 May 2026, 08:11 UTC≈9,370 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 三载砥砺,感恩同行!Wap 三周年庆典正式开启 🎉 致各位亲爱的小伙伴: 弹指一挥间,Wap 已经陪伴大家走过了三个年头。三年的成长,离不开每一位用户的信任、包容与支持。无论是每一次赞美,还是每一条中肯的批评,都是我们不断优化网络、丰富产品线、完善售后服务的动力源泉。 未来的时光,我们期待继续与您并肩同行,稳步前行! 为了回馈大家的长久支持,我们准备了 100% 中奖 的周年庆翻牌抽奖活动,一点心意,期待您的参与! 👉 立即参与: 登录官网 wap.ac 登录账户即可参与。 🎁 活动详情 • 总奖金池: 520 USD • 中奖概率: 100% 中奖(最低 0.5 U,最高 50 U) • 活动时间: 2026.05.20 20:20 (UTC+8) • 开奖截止: 2026.05.20 23:59 (UTC+8) (若有特殊情况,时间将适当延长) • 参与条件: 截至 2026.05.19 23:59 (UTC

👍5👎42

6 May 2026, 05:00 UTC≈3,360 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

受影响网段 85.237.206.0/23 现已全面恢复正常

👌3

6 May 2026, 00:01 UTC≈3,340 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ 【故障通知】台湾 EPYC VPS 网络异常说明 尊敬的用户: 您好!目前我们监测到台湾节点部分 IP 段出现网络不可达的情况。 📍 影响范围: 85.237.206.0/23 我们的技术团队已介入并正在紧急排查故障原因。我们将密切跟进,并在第一时间同步最新的修复进展。 给您的使用带来不便,我们深表歉意,感谢您的理解与耐心等待!

😨1

19 Apr 2026, 03:19 UTC≈4,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

📢 维护通知 TW E5 HINET LXC IPv6 维护时间 18号 22:00 ~ 19号 09:00(共11小时) 维护内容 HINET NAT VPS 迁移 影响 IPv6 地址有变动 ⚠️ 当前状态 ✅ 迁移已完成 用户需做 登录面板查看新的 IPv6 地址

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wap_ac. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 460,331 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,206
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“wap.ac” (@wap_ac), 3,205 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wap_ac.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.