4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,918–4,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:35
4,919
-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:22
4,920
-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:26
4,921
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:32
4,923
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
62.2%
avg views ÷ 4,919 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,060
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
32 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
97,960
Reactions total
3,825
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,825 reactions across 31 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
788
20.6%
👍
785
20.5%
🔥
653
17.1%
🤣
520
13.6%
💯
475
12.4%
❤
279
7.29%
👏
150
3.92%
🙈
41
1.07%
🤝
20
0.523%
💩
17
0.444%
🙏
16
0.418%
🤯
9
0.235%
🥰
9
0.235%
✍
8
0.209%
🤡
8
0.209%
🤮
7
0.183%
👻
6
0.157%
👌
5
0.131%
🤔
5
0.131%
🫡
4
0.105%
12 further kinds
20
0.523%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 32 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vseoakpp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сходили на "Тартюфа" в театр им Лавренева.
Прекрасная труппа там, к слову.
И что меня впечатлило в давно смотренной и забытой пьесе: феноменальное упорство лоха в его стремлении быть кинутым.
Там же тезис "лох это судьба" красной нитью.
Причем, чем больше людей лоху говорят о его грядущей судьбе, тем активнее он к ней стремится. Семья, друзья, не, их мнение ничто. К приблудному разводиле: полное доверие!
"К сволочи …
Я не спец, но почему лютые сбивают МОГами с пулеметами, а не ФПВ?
Как бы стрельба по низколетящий цели то ещё занятие ..
А ФПВ не используют в ПВО по техническим причинам или религия не позволяет?
Мутные расклады.
Звонит тип, долго ебет Муму, потом и видео ему и то ему и сё ему.
Ну ок. Вроде везёт машину.
Потом , мол, не он везёт, а друг. Да похуй, хоть любовник жены соседа хозяина кота,обоссавшего тебе колесо. Мне без разницы.
-Только вы ему скажите, что это бесплатно (wtf?) , а я вам потом заплачу.
Ну ок.
Звонит друг. Мне мол сказали у вас бесплатно мне коробку поменяют.
Грю, в моем лексиконе это слово вообщ…
Какой то невыразимый кайф от того, что ты можешь ездить по городу от сюда до туда. До туда где тебе надо, а не где машину можно поставить по цене ужина в приличном ресторане.
И дворы не перекрыты. А то ж все в Москве шлагбаумами закрылись и усе. Охраняют свой удел не у дел. В театр? В ресторан? Ты уже не афишу смотришь, не меню, а где тачку кинуть.
Нет, я то противоядие нашел. Я даже пакость придумал.
Надо узнать ном…
У меня тут бывшая пассия с глузду съехала, оказывается. Либерализьмой ее придавило. Фляга свистнула от кровавых злодеяний терана.
Там совсем беда... "И только диссидент Георгий держал плакат "ДОЛОЙ РЕЖИМ!"
Каждую встречу в митинг превращает. Всех прокляла. Народ то там актерский, все больше похуистичный... Да и годы не те..
Но тут прям беда...
До Таты доебалась, мол, что ты сделала для свержения терана?! А?! В глаза…
Ну и вдогонку. Приняли этот закон. Петь послушав.
Пришла команда из Москвы убить всех кошек в Севастополе, например
Гуманно. Подчеркиваю- гуманно!
Через сколько времени на чугунных воротах повесят первого живодера? Гуманно повесят, подчёркиваю? А второго?
А Крым от России отделится через сколько?
Но Петям на это плевать. Пети об этих аспектах не задумываются.
Задумываться это вообще не про Петь.
Хорошо, что у нас Дум…
Ноль у меня претензий к депутатам. Почитаешь граждан и понимаешь, что плоть от плоти они от народа! Честь его , стыд, срам, эта.. ум тоже. Вот
Петя пишет мол всех бродячих кошек надо убить (гуманно)
Аргументы?
Их есть у Пети!
"Не, кошек бродячих.
Все течет, все меняется, Макс.
Поднимется малярия, начнет народ мереть, так как кошки птиц выбили, а птицы комаров не жрут, и поменяется отношение к кошечкам."
Раньше про…
Повторюсь.
Там в ветке мне какую то инициативу про бродячих собак скинули.
Не знаю, я с бродячими собаками в округе разобрался по своему, у меня свои законы. За 1 Мотю всех под корень.
В радиусе 5 км. Килл зона.
Забежал/ сдох.
Но. В законопроекте какие то опять абстрактные ЖИВОТНЫЕ.
КАКИЕ, БЛЯДЬ, ЖИВОТНЫЕ?!
КРОКОДИЛЫ? УТКОНОСЫ? ЛЕММИНГИ? ХОМЯКИ?
ИЛИ КОШКИ?
Они там что: старушек загрызли? Кошки эти окаянные? Дитя обл…
Загорать на пляже , при том что над головой шарашит "Утес" , сбоку пускают "Иглу" а мимо над морем летит хохлячий дрон - это прям мое.
Символизирует бытие мое довольно точно.
Впервые увидел , кстати. За 1,5 месяца.
В Кратово Кабан их наблюдал по нескольку в день.
Так шта...
Я им скажу: не верь молве!
Их там не больше, чем в Москве...
🔥99😁10👏5❤4👍3💊2🖕1
Signed Максим
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @vseoakpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 316,108 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Все о АКПП” (@vseoakpp), 4,919 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vseoakpp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.