8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,960–3,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 08:39
3,008
+6
24 Aug 2026, 08:17
3,002
+8
20 Aug 2026, 15:28
2,994
+7
17 Aug 2026, 20:59
2,987
+12
14 Aug 2026, 14:38
2,975
+8
10 Aug 2026, 23:24
2,967
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:40
2,966
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:46
2,966
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 46s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
955 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
239
25.0%
❤
230
24.1%
👍
201
21.0%
😁
50
5.24%
🤣
49
5.13%
🤡
36
3.77%
🥰
32
3.35%
👏
31
3.25%
🤝
26
2.72%
👌
23
2.41%
🐳
11
1.15%
🦄
8
0.838%
🎉
5
0.524%
💅
5
0.524%
💯
4
0.419%
🏆
3
0.314%
🫡
2
0.209%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 955reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2,655
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 17 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
426
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vpn_404_vodka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Привет, уважаемый, но не любимый 🌹
Еще пару слов о последних обновлениях «Селёдки» 2.X.X, включая последнею сборку 2.1.0
Добавилось у нас нехерово так. Начнём с долгожданной поддержки Raspberry Pi 5 и полного перехода на x64-архитектуру, который действительно отлично показал себя в работе.
Вся внутрянка теперь построена на новом оптимизированном коде. Он прошёл краш-тесты, несколько этапов бета-тестирования и уже …
Привет роднуль 🫶
Продолжаем накидывать в VODKA IP CHECK полезностей. Данный инструмент , как и дохуя много других полезных сервисов можешь найдти у нас на сайте.
Что добавили:
добавили в Vodka IP Check новый блок WSS vs TCP Latency:
WSS Round Trip — полная задержка обмена данными между браузером и сервером по защищенному WebSocket (WSS), включая все промежуточные сетевые узлы и обработку.
TCP Handshake RTT — задерж…
Совсем забыл написать родной.
В связи с выходом крупного обновления SELEDKA с эмуляцией WIFI окружения, поддержкой Raspberry Pi 5, fingerprint networking edit и прочей другой полезной лабудой.....
🚨 ПОДОРОЖАНИЕ 🚨
Теперь смотри, так будет:
💎 Лицензия VODKA+SELEDKA
по инвайту или рекомендации — 750 USDT
💰 Лицензия VODKA+SELEDKA
без инвайта или рекомендации — 1500 USDT
🔁 Перенос подписки с аккаунта на аккаунт
(пр…
Привет родной 🌹
Ну что, нам обновили SELEDKу 🔥
Версия 2.0.0
Из основного:
ПОДДЕРЖКА RASPBERRY PI 5
ЭМУЛЯЦИЯ WI-FI ОКРУЖЕНИЯ ( привет всем геокомплайщикам👋)
WI-FI PENTEST теперь перебирает по паролям, а не только перехватывает handshake
Малина ПРИНИМАЕТ ИНТЕРНЕТ ТЕПЕРЬ И С IPHONE по проводу
Из остального под катом👇👇👇:
Версия 2.0.0
Версия 2.0.0 по сути совершенно новый продукт написанный с нуля. Мы оставили лишь…
Ну что нелюбимый 🚩
Давай ПОЗДРАВИМ ВОДОЧНОГО СУППОРТА с его рождением много лет назад.
За это время он стал настоящей поддержкой и опорой всему водочному комьюнити.
Любим тебя ценим родной 😘
И в честь такого события как всегда ништяки подписоте:
Раскидываем на толпу 50 очков на водочную рулетку
Если у тебя активная подписка на водку то проверяй в своем кабинете очко, возможно ты тот счастливчик
Береги себя и буд…
💝 Привет, родной!
⚡️ Ну что, случилось ВАЖНОЕ.
Я и моя команда хочет еще раз заявить о себе запуском экосистемы с множеством продуктов и БЕСПЛАТНЫХ сервисов.
Тебе уже сейчас доступен наш НОВЫЙ ЛЕНДИНГ, где они все представлены. На данный момент, прямо скажем, их не дохуя. Но мы будем работать над запуском новых сервисов и обновлений уже существующих.
Идея такова — ты не заворачиваешься с поиском сервисов и продук…
Привет родной, но не любимый 💔
Хорошая новость.
У нас появился @vodka_aml_bot
По названию не трудно догадаться что это и зачем.
Проверяем в сетях:
• BTC
• ETH
• TRON
💸 Цена проверки — смех: 0.9 $
🎁 Так же накидываем 3 бесплатных чека всем пользователям VODKA.
Чеки начисляются автоматически, если твоя TG в базе кабинета на 404.vodka
Увидишь баги — пиши.
Там есть тикеты.
Береги себя и будь под водкой 🌹
Привет уважаемый, но не любимый 🌹
Сегодня у меня такая новость.
В @vodka_check_bot добавлен расширенный proxy check.
Теперь бот проверяет не только TCP-доступность прокси, но и UDP support для SOCKS5, outbound IP и IP reputation data.
В результате выводятся:
- risk score / risk level
- hostname
- geo info: country, region, city, ZIP
- network info: organization, connection type
- detection flags: proxy, VPN, com…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vpn_404_vodka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 353,442 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“404.vodka” (@vpn_404_vodka), 3,008 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpn_404_vodka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.