14 Mar 2025, 14:34 UTC338 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo
🚀 100,000 already? Feels like day one. Thanks for being here Something’s on the horizon. It’s value time Treasure? Maybe Probably nothing
⚡3
Channel
VOID Community
@voidnotherex_0T
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002650923330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @voidnotherex_0T |
| Description | Enter the VOID - @VoidNotHereBot Chat - @VoidNotHereChat Not Games - @thenotgames |
| Created | 13 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/voidnotherex_0T |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 13 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 32s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2025 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
13 Mar 2025, 04:05 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video
😈 ENTER THE VOID — WE ARE OPEN Closed Beta is done 🎉 50,000 players were testing the space for a few weeks. Thank you all for your participation — for the bugs, the feedback, and the chaos. You’re insane 😊 Void is open, for everyone 😡 Pick your playstyle, dominate, and show them who’s the best Climb the ranks, flex your skills, grab rewards Then do it all over again Dear Beta frens ♥️ There's a little surprise …
⚡3
13 Mar 2025, 03:50 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @voidnotherex_0T. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,118,578 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“VOID Community” (@voidnotherex_0T). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voidnotherex_0T.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.