Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Voice for Victoria

Channel

Voice for Victoria

@voiceforvictoria

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,031subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001514180969
TypeChannel
Username@voiceforvictoria
Created19 September 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/voiceforvictoria

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0311,0481,039.57 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,046 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,039 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,034 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,033 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,031 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,028–1,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:401,031-2
14 Sept 2026, 11:381,033-1
10 Sept 2026, 23:211,034-5
1 Sept 2026, 23:551,039-1
27 Aug 2026, 12:271,040-1
24 Aug 2026, 15:541,041-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:441,043-1
18 Aug 2026, 06:521,044-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:231,046-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:331,048no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:161,048first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2023, 11:35 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 7 August 2026

@Mitchyball @Explosive_Nicka Laughed aloud at this. Great comment 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 11:35 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 7 August 2026

@MichaelAus9999 Yeah but the volume of FN votes isn't enough to be the decider and demonstrably it's not enough to change the majority of the other votes so far. 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 11:35 UTC≈2,450 viewsread 7 August 2026

Interested to see if the proposed alternative (whatever that looks like) statistically causes some of the "undecided" votes to turn into "no" on the basis they can then argue that they're 'voting for the alternative, not just voting no'. https://t.co/7qkoQIGXar 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 11:35 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 7 August 2026

This is absolutely how some people think and there seems to still be a decent sized middle ground of people who still aren't sure, so bets are currently open about what will actually sway them in either direction. 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 04:00 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 7 August 2026

@Explosive_Nicka I truly can't understand how people can say they're 'too far' in either direction & simultaneously admit they can't define what they DO stand for. They have a straight up identity crisis - summarised by the fact there can be such opposing opinions on what side they've gone to. 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 02:20 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

@santa_claudes HAHA ironically the one platform I don't use. 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 02:20 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

@Of_Bourke Will never forget meeting Labor's Mulgrave rep during the election. A proud hardcore commie socialist bloke who said he loved Dan and the unions because of the insane amount he got paid an hour to do traffic control. We had a civilised debate once about who was really paying for… https://t.co/FPR21tF4YG 🐦

5 Apr 2023, 01:55 UTC892 viewsread 7 August 2026

Anyone got updates on the union rally in the city eg images or where they're going - put it in the comments. The coverage of this protest seems super scattered by the media. 🐦

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @voiceforvictoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Voice for Victoria” (@voiceforvictoria), 1,031 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voiceforvictoria.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.