Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vlaams Belang

@vlbelang

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,904subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001202618102
TypeChannel
Username@vlbelang
Created18 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vlbelang

Growth

2,9042,9142,9096 August 2026 — 2,914 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,913 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,904 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,903–2,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:262,904-4
10 Aug 2026, 07:262,908-5
7 Aug 2026, 02:172,913-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:042,914first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2025, 10:16 UTC≈3,650 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Het beleid van premier De Wever is een fiasco: nooit kreeg de Vlaming zó weinig terug voor zijn stem. De N-VA zit overal aan de knoppen, maar stelt overal teleur. Hij beloofde de kiezer minder migratie, minder belastingen en meer veiligheid. Wat kregen we in de plaats? Keiharde besparingen, meer asielchaos, meer lasten en meer absurde pestmaatregelen. De Vlamingen staan nu voor een duidelijke keuze: óf blijven vastho

28 Oct 2024, 16:28 UTC≈7,630 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SPOEDBETOGING. Verdedig mee onze democratie tegen fysiek geweld, intimidatie, broodroof... en kom naar de protestactie in Izegem. We mogen nooit tolereren dat de democratie onder druk komt te staan door allerlei weerzinwekkende bedreigingen. Afspraak op woensdag 30 oktober om 19u aan het stadhuis van Izegem (Korenmarkt 10). Wees erbij!

26 Oct 2024, 11:12 UTC≈6,620 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Stap voor stap. Na Ninove en Ranst breken we vandaag het cordon in de stad Izegem! Bedankt aan iedereen die dit mogelijk heeft gemaakt. Wij blijven hard doorwerken. U kan op ons rekenen!

19 Oct 2024, 15:09 UTC≈5,310 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Vandaag werd het cordon definitief doorbroken in de Antwerpse gemeente Ranst. Het Vlaams Belang zal lokaal mee besturen en levert een schepen met kopvrouw Christel Engelen. “Na de overweldigende overwinning van Guy D’haeseleer in Ninove valt nu de volgende dominosteen in het rijtje”, reageert partijvoorzitter Tom Van Grieken. “Het cordon sanitaire ligt officieel achter ons. Een nieuwe tijd breekt aan, een tijd waarin

17 Oct 2024, 10:59 UTC≈3,780 viewsread 7 August 2026

Sinds de historische verkiezingen van 13 oktober blijft de media en het regime bagger verspreiden over onze allereerste Vlaams Belang-burgemeester Guy D'haeseleer. Wat een slechte verliezers. Het volk heeft in Ninove eindelijk het cordon zélf gebroken en wij blijven Guy steunen. Steek hem ook een hart onder de riem via https://iksteunguy.be en laat zien dat Vlaanderen Guy wil zien besturen!

20 Sept 2024, 17:01 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Binnen drie weken is het aan u. Dan beslist u over uw eigen gemeente én provincie. De laatste nationale peiling van HLN en VTM is hoopgevend, maar we weten dat er héél véél mensen nog niets beslist hebben. Overtuig daarom uw vrienden, familie, buren, collega's... om te gaan stemmen en te kiezen op het enige alternatief: het Vlaams Belang. Kies dus veilig en Vlaams, kies ervoor om onze mensen op de eerste plaats te ze

2 Sept 2024, 04:58 UTC≈4,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Het Vlaams Belang wenst iedereen een prachtige en veilige eerste schooldag toe! Maak er een geweldig schooljaar van.

19 Jul 2024, 12:46 UTC≈5,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Schitterende familiedag in Planckendael op komst! Geniet van een spetterende dag met onder andere een openingstoespraak door onze nationale voorzitter Tom Van Grieken, tal van leuke kinderanimatie en een geweldig groot dierenpark, exclusief open voor leden van het Vlaams Belang. Schrijf u nu in samen met uw kinderen en/of kleinkinderen via https://www.vlaamsbelang.org/familiedag/.

11 Jul 2024, 05:54 UTC≈4,560 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We wensen iedereen een fijne en strijdbare Vlaamse feestdag toe. Het Vlaams Belang zal altijd Vlaanderen en de Vlamingen op de eerste plaats zetten. U kan op ons rekenen!

13 Jun 2024, 16:39 UTC≈5,130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Binnen vier weken is het zover: 11 juli, onze Vlaamse feestdag! Heeft u nog geen Vlaamse Leeuw? Bestel dan vandaag uw gratis vlag via www.leeuwenvlag.vlaanderen en vier samen met ons de Vlaamse identiteit!

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vlbelang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 629,053 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vlaams Belang” (@vlbelang), 2,904 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vlbelang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.