Vizier podcastida mehmon PDP asoschisi, investor va tadbirkor Odilbek Mirzayev. "Omad yordir dovyuraklarga!" Bir shu jumla orqali podcastni ifodalayman. Har qanday abituriyent, student va ta'lim sohasiga tegishli odam ko'rishi kerak bo'lgan suhbat bo'ldi. Odilbek Mirzayevdan sovg'a: Suhbatdan olingan yaxshi xulosalarni YOUTUBE da commentlarda yozing, 3 kishi tanlab olinadi, tanlab olinganlar bilan Odilbek Mirzaye…

Channel
Vizier | Biznes va Iqtisod
@vizieruz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,259subscribers
-139 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001477199068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vizieruz |
| Description | Vizier - Biznes olamidagi asosiy tushunchalar va yangiliklar. Eksklyuziv biznes strategiyalari, bozor tendensiyalari va iqtisodiy intellekt uchun jurnal. Hamkorlik uchun: @vizier_ads |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vizieruz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 10,259 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 10,263 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 10,280 | -29 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 10,309 | -23 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 10,332 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 10,342 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 10,354 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 10,363 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 10,372 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 10,389 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 10,398 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 10,398 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.37%
- avg views ÷ 10,259 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 346
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 346 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,050
- Videos
- ≈232
- Links
- ≈1,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 44.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 29.6% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 18.5% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
O'zingizni muvaffaqiyatli deb hisoblashdan oldin, o'z ustingizda ishlashni boshlamaganingizni anglaysizmi? Ko'pchilik, muvaffaqiyatga erishish uchun faqat yaxshi niyatlar va qiyin mehnat yetarli deb o'ylaydi, lekin aslida bu yetarli emas. - Har qanday muvaffaqiyatli biznesning 90% vaqtini strategik rejalashtirish va tahlil qilishga sarflaydi, shuning uchun harakat qilishdan oldin o'ylash muhim. - Muvaffaqiyatga eri…
❤2
Kam gapiradiganlar ko'pincha eng kuchli o'ylovchilar hisoblanadi. Odamlar ko'pincha sukunatni zaiflik deb bilishadi, lekin bu ularning o'z fikrlarini va his-tuyg'ularini tahlil qilishda vaqt sarflashini anglatadi. - Kam gapirish, ko'proq eshitish va o'rganish imkoniyatini taqdim etadi, bu esa strategik qarorlar qabul qilishda muhim ahamiyatga ega. - O'z fikrini ifoda etishdan ko'ra, muhokama qilish va boshqa fikrla…
👍4❤3
Boy odamlar muvaffaqiyatga erishishda qiyinchiliklardan qochmaydi, balki ularga qarshi kurashadi. 99% odamlar muvaffaqiyatga erishishda "qulaylik" va "xavfsizlik"ni afzal ko'radi, bu esa ularni doimo orqada qoldiradi. - Raqobatchilaringizni ko'rish va o'rganish, ulardan ilhomlanish o'rniga, o'z muvaffaqiyatlaringizni ta'kidlashga intilish. - Pulingizni ishlatishdan ko'ra, uni investitsiya qilish va yangi imkoniyatl…
❤2👍2
Oddiylik kuchli strategiya emas, balki muvaffaqiyatning asosiy kalitidir. Odamlar murakkablikka e'tibor berishadi, lekin oddiy va samarali yechimlarni ko'rishdan ko'ra qiyin yo'llarni tanlaydilar. - Soddalashtirish orqali xarajatlarni kamaytirish va samaradorlikni oshirish ko'pincha muvaffaqiyatli kompaniyalar tomonidan qo'llaniladi. - Oson tushuniladigan takliflar ko'proq mijozlarni jalb qiladi, chunki ular murakk…
❤3💯2
Odamlar hayotlarini boshqarish o'rniga, boshqalar tomonidan boshqarilayotganini bilmaydi. Ko'pchilik o'z orzularini amalga oshirishda va maqsadlariga erishishda doimo yutqazadi, chunki ular tashqi ta'sirlar va ijtimoiy bosimlarga berilib qolishadi. - O'z vaqtini boshqarishni o'rganmagan odamlar, juda ko'p vaqtni boshqalar uchun sarflashadi, natijada o'z hayotini unutadi. - To'g'ri strategiya va reja yo'qligida, muv…
❤2
Qulaylik sizni muvaffaqiyatdan mahrum qiladi. Ko'pchilik o'zini qulay sharoitda tutish orqali muvaffaqiyatga erishishini o'ylaydi, ammo bu xato. - Uzoq muddatli muvaffaqiyat uchun doimiy qiyinchiliklarni yengish zarur. - Qulaylik keltiradigan har bir imkoniyat, aslida, sizni o'sishdan to'xtatadi. O'z o'rningizda qolish sizni hech qachon oldinga olib bormaydi. Sizning qulaylikka bo'lgan ishtiyoqingiz, hayotingizda…
❤1
Siz ko'p ishlarni boshlaysiz, lekin hech qachon tugatolmaysiz — bu sizning muvaffaqiyatsizlikka tayyorlanayotganingizni anglatadi. Odamlar ko'pincha o'z maqsadlariga erishish uchun kerakli strategiyalarni tushunmaydilar va harakat qilmaydilar. - Muvaffaqiyatga erishish uchun siz o'zingizni yo'qotishingiz kerak, lekin ko'pchilik buni qabul qilmaydi. - Harakat qilishdan ko'ra, natijalarni kutish — bu eng katta xato, …
❤2
Internetda e'tiborni jalb qilishning eng samarali yo'li — bu uni yo'qotishdir. Ko'pchilik o'zlarini har safar diqqatni qaytarishga harakat qilishda chalg'itadi, lekin bu usul faqat vaqtni behuda sarflashdir. - Diqqatni qaytarish uchun odamlar ko'pincha ko'p narsalarni bir vaqtning o'zida bajarishga harakat qilishadi, bu esa natijada samaradorlikni pasaytiradi. - O'z-o'zini bir muddat izolyatsiya qilish va mobil qur…
❤3
TikTok sizni nafaqat ko'ngil ochish uchun, balki hayotingizni o'zgartirish uchun ham o'rgatmoqda. Ko'pchilik bu platformaning vaqtni behuda sarflashdan boshqa hech narsaga qodir emasligini o'ylaydi, lekin ular aslida imkoniyatlarni yo'qotmoqda. - TikTok orqali yaratilgan brendlar o'z mahsulotlarini 300% ga ko'paytirishi mumkin, chunki ular to'g'ridan-to'g'ri iste'molchilarga yetib boradi. - Har bir video foydalanuv…
❤1
Charchash va natijalar orasidagi farq — bu sizning harakatlaringizning samaradorligi emas, balki strategiyangizning noto'g'ri tanlanishidir. Odamlar ko'pincha harakat qilishni natijaga erishish bilan tenglashtiradi, lekin harakat qilishning o'zi yetarli emas. - Eng ko'p vaqt sarflaydiganlar ko'pincha eng kam natija ko'radi, chunki ular noto'g'ri yo'nalishda harakat qilishadi. - O'z vaqtini rejalashtirish va priorit…
❤4
Motivatsiya — bu sizni muvaffaqiyatga erishishingizga to'sqinlik qiluvchi eng katta firibgarlik. Odamlar o'zlarini ishga solish uchun motivatsiyani qidirishadi, lekin aslida bu faqat vaqtni behuda sarflashdir. - Muvaffaqiyatning asosiy kaliti — harakat va strategik rejalashtirish, motivatsiya emas. - Ko'p hollarda, muvaffaqiyatga erishish uchun siz o'z his-tuyg'ularingizni bir chetga surib qo'yishingiz kerak. Sizn…
💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vizieruz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 953,811 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vizier | Biznes va Iqtisod” (@vizieruz), 10,259 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vizieruz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.