Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@virellastarsl was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@virellastarsss held 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Growth
33 measurements spanning 79 days, net +3,449. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 11:11
5,725
+5,722
22 Oct 2026, 13:41
3
-5,796
21 Oct 2026, 06:10
5,799
-63
18 Oct 2026, 11:46
5,862
+5,858
15 Oct 2026, 17:39
4
-5,961
15 Oct 2026, 08:41
5,965
-76
12 Oct 2026, 05:21
6,041
+6,036
7 Oct 2026, 19:57
5
-6,278
5 Oct 2026, 05:56
6,283
-537
27 Sept 2026, 01:41
6,820
-1,671
15 Sept 2026, 20:57
8,491
-465
12 Sept 2026, 10:15
8,956
-1,752
10 Sept 2026, 09:57
10,708
-481
7 Sept 2026, 03:58
11,189
-363
4 Sept 2026, 23:22
11,552
-112
4 Sept 2026, 06:39
11,664
-147
3 Sept 2026, 08:45
11,811
no change
3 Sept 2026, 08:30
11,811
-153
2 Sept 2026, 04:05
11,964
-132
1 Sept 2026, 04:38
12,096
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 107 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,029 reactions across 71 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5325925992986874826
1,115
18.5%
custom 5323699039558998678
1,011
16.8%
custom 5323530406258055253
602
9.99%
custom 5260567255145539253
515
8.54%
custom 5256131095094652290
419
6.95%
custom 5271721134889395048
379
6.29%
custom 5373098610936278022
361
5.99%
custom 5323322383812031840
313
5.19%
custom 5408916284542834778
257
4.26%
custom 5289944036881230584
211
3.50%
custom 5262922516426420894
187
3.10%
custom 5325876429064270383
184
3.05%
custom 5323290235981830052
178
2.95%
custom 5400215260621738812
125
2.07%
custom 5388924543219832243
95
1.58%
custom 5368792244797089961
67
1.11%
custom 5217726120304079759
10
0.166%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
634
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 104 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
443
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @virellastarsl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как начался ваш учебный год? Расскажите, как прошел первый день в школе или колледже🥰
На данный момент мы временно не проводим конкурсы из за финансовых вопросов, но совсем скоро всё наладится, и мы снова запустим крутые активности. Спасибо, что вы с нами!
канал: @virellastars
чатик: @virellChat
отзывы: клик
⭐️Ребята, возвращаемся в строй и наращиваем актив! Впереди куча масштабных конкурсов и розыгрышей: за активность в чате и просто случайным участникам.
Включайте уведомления, чтобы ничего не пропустить (беспокоить по пустякам не будем, работаем напрямую без менеджеров)
Для тех, кто интересовался нашей статистикой за 2024–2026 гг:
— 500+ подписок телеграм премиума(от 3 месяцев до года);
— 200к+ звезд.
Дальше - больше!…
💄💄💄💄💄💄💄
Участник, занявший лидирующую позицию (1 место) в стате чата, получит приз - 500 звезд
💬чат: @virellChat
⏲Окончание
конкурса: через сутки
⚠️А так же за пересылку этого поста у вас будет 2Х шанс! Желаем всем успехов!
🔥 РОЗЫГРЫШ 2500 ЗВЁЗД СРЕДИ ПОДПИСЧИКОВ!
Хотите бесплатно получить звёзды? Условия максимально просты:
1. Подписаться на @virellastars
2. @bigsorts
⏳ Итоги уже через 24 часа! Победителя выберет рандомайзер. Всем удачи! ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @virellastarsl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@virellastarsl edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 78 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 60 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 18 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“virellastars” (@virellastarsl), 5,725 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virellastarsl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.