Channel
@vectorved
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
938subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001783546840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vectorved |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vectorved |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 938 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 936 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 935 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (5 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 856 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
79 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 38 | 48.1% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 11.4% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vectorved. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😎 Новости, которые мы заслужили 🌀Таможня послабляет первичный контроль, но платить декларантам приходится больше. За первое полугодие 2026 года таможня доначислила бизнесу 35,2 млрд рублей по результатам таможенного контроля после выпуска товаров. Основные причины доначисления платежей: ✔️занижение таможенной стоимости; ✔️неверный код ТН ВЭД; ✔️несоблюдение запретов и ограничений; ✔️расхождения между документами н…
👍3❤1
😎 Рубрика «вопрос из зала»: «Проходила практику в ЦЭД, хочу писать диплом по ним. Эта тема актуальна или нет?». Вчера в запрещенной соцсети я проводила рубрику вопрос-ответ и некоторые вопросы связаны с написанием дипломов. Скоро начнется эпопея с выбором тем, составлением планов и прочие проблемы этого жанра. Чтобы понять актуальность или неактуальность темы диплома ее нужно рассматривать глобально: достаточно ли…
🔥3❤2🤔1
🃏 Раскрываю карты по лицензии Минпромторга и лесоматериалам. Всё дело в том, что экспортер не был производителем лесоматериалов, а выступал перекупщиком. Лицензия Минпромторга была выдана не экспортеру, а производителю лесоматериалов и не распространялась на деятельность компании-перекупщика. В итоге использовать эту лицензию для получения льготы по уплате вывозной таможенной пошлины при экспорте было нельзя. Кста…
👍3❤1🔥1
Почему таможня не предоставила льготу экспортеру лесоматериалов?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤷♀ Кейс из практики ВЭД: что пошло не так? Экспортер лесоматериалов запросил льготу по уплате вывозной таможенной пошлины на основании лицензии Минпромторга России. Таможня начала документальный контроль и выяснилось, что льгота экспортеру не положена. Как думаете, почему? Выбирайте ответ ниже, а в следующем посте разберем логику таможни и правильный ответ.
❤2🔥1
Две встречи в Санкт-Петербурге Как принимать решения, от которых зависит результат бизнеса? В августе Логистический клуб приглашает на две практические встречи для собственников, руководителей и специалистов. 📌 20 августа | 17:00–21:00 «Логистика на цифрах и на практике: от финансовой модели управления бизнесом и цепочками поставок до успешного внедрения изменений» Разберем, как рассчитывать решения и успешно вне…
👍3
😎 Новости, которые мы заслужили 🌀Правительство Республики Корея приступило к разработке стратегии по привлечению грузов для перевозок по Северному морскому пути (СМП), рассчитывая открыть регулярное коммерческое сообщение уже к 2030 году. Перемещение товаров по СМП должно существенно сократить сроки доставки товаров морем из Кореи в ЕС транзитом через Россию. P.s.: использование СМП должно привести к сокращению ра…
🔥3❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🎁 Победитель (№4) получает в подарок обучение на третьем потоке интенсива «ВЭД от «А» до «Я»», все подробности напишу в личные сообщения. Также приятные бонусы я разошлю другим участникам розыгрыша.
🔥4🥰1
🥳 Мама двухлетки... Да-да, это я о себе. Сегодня моему профессиональному детищу - онлайн-школе «ВекторВЭД» исполнилось 2 года. Если сравнивать проект с ребенком, то с двухлеткой, конечно, немного проще, чем с годовасиком, но не сильно. Всё так же "не спишь по ночам", переживаешь за каждый шаг и хочешь не наступить на те же грабли в развитии, что и вчера. Но, когда видишь результат своей работы (нашей с вами работы…
🔥11❤3
Я - художник, я так вижу. Сегодня я писала Михайловский замок в Летнем саду - это было великолепно. Если отбросить мой авторский стиль, то Михайловский замок и карпиев пруд получились очень узнаваемыми. Доменико Терезини оценил бы 🥳
🔥3❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @vectorved. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Почему таможня не предоставила льготу экспортеру лесоматериалов?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Выбирайте подарок 💫
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Онлайн-школа «ВекторВЭД»” (@vectorved), 938 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vectorved.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.