7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,529–1,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 17:24
1,531
+1
23 Aug 2026, 06:45
1,530
-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:49
1,532
-1
13 Aug 2026, 12:39
1,533
-4
10 Aug 2026, 21:33
1,537
-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:06
1,540
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,540
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 28 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
278 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
90
32.4%
😁
71
25.5%
❤
56
20.1%
👍
52
18.7%
💯
9
3.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vasilevtim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 March 2025 to 1 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ChatGPT теперь продает шмотки…
…но переводит текст на картинке все также паршиво))
Пишешь ему "найди мне серобуромалиновую толстовку" и он не просто ссылку дает, а прямо там же оформляет заказ.
Как это работает?
Выбор товара, доставка, оплата - все происходит прямо в чате, никуда переходить не надо.
Если у тебя платная подписка, даже карту вводить не придется - спишут с той же карты, что и за подписку.
Пока раб…
ChatGPT привел клиента, который купил курс
Сижу, ковыряюсь в аналитике своего проекта и чуть не подавился кофе.
В источниках трафика вижу - ChatGPT. Не гугл, не яндекс, а блин ChatGPT привел клиента, который купил курс.
Сейчас ChatGPT генерит 77% всего ИИ-трафика в мире, это почти 4 из 5 человек, кто юзает нейронки для поиска инфы. А я то думал, это так, побаловаться с картинками да текстики писать.
Как это работ…
Вчера в поддержку пишет женщина - мол, в курсе по трихологии какие-то лопающиеся звуки, невозможно слушать. А она уже не первый продукт покупает, нужно срочно спасать ситуацию.
Я дурак что ли, все вручную делать? И пошел ии-шки юзать.
Скачал видео на 3 часа с копейкой. Думаю че дальше.
Конечно пошел в Adobe Podcast, пробовал - полубесплатно, целиком такой длины нельзя обработать и результат в пробной версии так се…
GPT-5 вышел и теперь можно:
• Написать один промпт и получить готовое приложение, сайт, мини-игру, симулятор города прямо в чате. По сути спиздили скопировали Lovable и этого стоило ожидать
• Задать сложный вопрос и модель включит режим «глубокого исследования», сама, без просьб
• Доступ будет у всех, но опять же с лимитами. А еще, возможно, чуть менее умная, чем на платной подписке :)
Что это значит для нас, мар…
Самая бесячая задача для меня - составлять точные маршруты в путешествиях, бронить билеты, жилье и прочее.
У меня на это своя суперсила - этим занимается моя супруга.
Она сидит, ковыряется в билетах, жилье ищет, маршруты строит, бюджет оптимизирует, а с меня собственно сам бюджет.
Сейчас мы путешествуем вместе по Европе - Италия, Венгрия, Чехия, ну и закидывает она мне в этот раз:
«Давай ищи интересную инфу про р…
Вдруг вам тоже делать нефиг и захотите побаловаться с чатомГПТ, промпт ниже 😃
Создай игрушку человека на фото, в стиле Funky Pop. Игрушка должна быть в полный рост, в руках фигурки [черный макбук]. На коробке снизу должно быть написано [Тимур Васильев] ниже [Чердак не маркетолога], он стоит в коробке. Наверху лого [@procherdak]. Надпись “pop!”. На уголке, яркая коробка [в стиле Cyberpunk]. Изобрази максимально реали…
Как самообесценивание убивает мечты.
Бывало у тебя так, что в голове крутится вопрос: «А кто я вообще?»
Я вот периодически об этом задумываюсь.
Как будто есть негласное правило: выбери одно дело, отдай ему 10 000 часов, стань мастером. Но меня от этого выворачивает. Потому что мне нравится разное. Ну не могу я себя назвать только предпринимателем. Или маркетологом. Или продюсером. Или кем-то ещё.
Вот, например, с…
❤12🔥12👍10😁7💯2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @vasilevtim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vasilevtim named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@procherdak named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не маркетолог” (@vasilevtim), 1,531 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasilevtim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.