Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اموزش استفاده از کانفیک های V2rayNG

@v2rayNGG01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,838subscribers

+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141488741
TypeChannel
Username@v2rayNGG01
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/v2rayNGG01

Growth

4,7704,8384,8046 August 2026 — 4,770 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,776 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,796 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,838 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,760–4,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:474,838+42
10 Aug 2026, 09:514,796+20
7 Aug 2026, 02:404,776+6
6 Aug 2026, 17:464,770first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.2%
avg views ÷ 4,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.662%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held17 (30 March 202431 July 2026)
Views total2,720
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,520 reactions across 17 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍58838.7%
50733.4%
👏1046.84%
🤝553.62%
👎513.36%
🔥301.97%
custom 5361563222132405424291.91%
💘201.32%
🖕171.12%
🥰150.987%
💯110.724%
❤‍🔥100.658%
😁100.658%
😭100.658%
🙏100.658%
🎃90.592%
🤯70.461%
🆒50.329%
🌭50.329%
🗿50.329%
11 further kinds221.45%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,520reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2024 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @v2rayNGG01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2024 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,720 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

📣 این آخرین بروزرسانی 🏳v2rayNG است که حدود یک ماه پیش منتشر شده. اگر از این کلاینت استفاده می‌کنید و هنوز آپدیت نکرده‌اید، پیشنهاد می‌شود حتماً به نسخه 2.2.6 بروزرسانی کنید. @v2ryNG01

👍124👏2

9 Jul 2026, 23:11 UTC≈5,370 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

🛍 آپدیت جدید V2rayNG منتشر شد🏳 🔥 حتما آپدیت کنید 🐱 دانلود از GitHub

👍248🔥5🎉2👏2

7 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC≈5,250 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://github.com/2dust/v2rayNG/releases/download/1.10.11/v2rayNG_1.10.11_arm64-v8a.apk نسخه اخر ویتوری🏳 بروز کنید اذیت نشید روی لینک بزنید دانلود کنید برنامه ویتوری بروزرسانی کنید واسه اندورید هستش🤖🤖 https://t.me/v2ryNG01

👍75🤝3🔥2

11 Feb 2026, 22:52 UTC≈16,000 views53 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

اخرین نسخه جدید ویتوری بروزرسانی کنید تا اذیت نشید واسه اندروید اگه برنامه اخرین نسخه بروز نباشه اذیت تون میکنه دوستان گل https://t.me/v2ryNG01

39👍5👌2🔥2🗿2🍓1🦄1🙏1

10 Dec 2025, 23:12 UTC≈33,100 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

v2rayNG_1.10.26_universal_DownloadClub.apk اخرین نسخه ویتوری هستش جدید ترین نسخه حتما نصب کنید بروزرسانی مینویسه براتون @v2ryNG01

79👍15❤‍🔥10🍌4🥰4👏3💋1

29 Jul 2025, 16:14 UTC≈48,800 views202 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

آپدیت جدید V2rayNG منتشر شد 2025 اخرین نسخه هستش پیشنهاد میشه حتما آپدیت کنید دانلود از گیت هاب @v2ryNG01

👏8165👍15🎃9🔥9💘7🖕7🌭5

9 Jul 2025, 21:34 UTC≈38,100 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://github.com/2dust/v2rayNG/releases/download/1.10.8/v2rayNG_1.10.8_arm64-v8a.apk 💙اخرین نسخه جدید ترین ویتوری بروزسانی کنید. پینگ تون کمترا از ۲۰۰ میشه اپدیت جدید نسخه اخرین ✅ اندورید💚2025 @v2ryNG01

44👍11👎7👏7💘6😭5

11 May 2025, 13:49 UTC≈46,500 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://github.com/2dust/v2rayNG/releases/download/1.10.2/v2rayNG_1.10.2_arm64-v8a.apk اخرین نسخه 2025 ویتوری🔐 برای اندورید🤖 1404 جدید ترین نصب کنید برنامه تون بروز بشه @v2ryNG01

🤝5229👍14👎9😭5

2 Dec 2024, 01:19 UTC≈49,100 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آخرین نسخه جدید [1403]. V2rayNG مخصوص اندورید🙂‍↔️

87👍13👎8💘7🖕7👏3🤨1

2 Dec 2024, 01:16 UTC≈60,900 views177 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

v2rayNG_1.9.22_armeabi-v7a.apk آپدیت جدید V2rayNG منتشر شد 🖥

👍9353🤯7👎6🔥5🆒5🥰4🗿3

7 Aug 2024, 23:49 UTC≈53,200 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

V2rayNG android 🔶 Version 1.8.34 نسخه جدید برنامه V2rayNG قابلیت های جدید :👇 1. Updated Xray-core to the latest version (1.8.21) 🔥 @v2ryNG01 @v2ryNG01

👍65custom 53615632221324054242926👎10🙏9🔥4

17 May 2024, 10:56 UTC≈49,300 views174 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✅تا خرخره تو گوشی کانفیگ نزارین اونوقت اختلال میکنه و هیچکدوم کار نمیکنن میگین بدرد نمیخوره یکم اتحاد و انصاف داشته باشین همیشه کانفیگ اینجا هست،فقط یک کانفیگ به فکر بقیه هم باشین خواهش میکنیم ازتون کانال اصلی @v2ryNG01

👍13016💯11😁8👎4🤩3🖕2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @v2rayNGG01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 39,887 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اموزش استفاده از کانفیک های V2rayNG” (@v2rayNGG01), 4,838 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v2rayNGG01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.