Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@ustakejuamalcomm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,858subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003807028769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ustakejuamalcomm |
| Created | 10 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ustakejuamalcomm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 1,858 | -43 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 1,901 | -61 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,962 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,962 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
107 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91 | 85.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 3.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
@Premiumvvip01bot welcome to our channel esteeemed user https://t.me/Premiumvvip01bot?start=start https://t.me/Truthwatchdogdci ✨𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐏 𝐈𝐍𝐓𝐎 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐋𝐃 𝐎𝐅 𝐏𝐔𝐑𝐄 𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐔𝐋𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐂✨ 𝐂𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲? 𝐔𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞, 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐔𝐋𝐋 𝐇𝐃—𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐥𝐮𝐱𝐮𝐫𝐲, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭… 𝐢𝐭’𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐞. 🔥 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐏 𝐎𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐒 …
❤89👍7😁5👎4
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @ustakejuamalcomm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 542,673 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MALCOM (machaji na manyonyois)” (@ustakejuamalcomm), 1,858 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ustakejuamalcomm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.