Startup Tau has launched humanoid robot apartment cleaning in San Francisco at $30 an hour Each robot is controlled in real time by an operator from Tau’s office. The cleaners have gone remote. @typespace_ai
❤2
![Telegram profile photo for Typespace Media [en]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/69/6950c76a47164d310213041106731f609f2890388492802f8ff0582d2fba7252.jpg)
Channel
@typespace_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48,810subscribers
-630 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002172556734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @typespace_ai |
| Description | Tech, science, internet and AI. Contact us: @wearekind ru channel: @typespace Free GPT-5 bot: @typespacebot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/typespace_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 48,810 | -70 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 48,880 | -117 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 48,997 | -78 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 49,075 | -46 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 49,121 | -88 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 49,209 | -50 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 49,259 | -79 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 49,338 | -47 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 49,385 | -55 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 49,440 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 43,930 |
| Reactions total | 57 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
57 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 52.6% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 26.3% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 15.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Startup Tau has launched humanoid robot apartment cleaning in San Francisco at $30 an hour Each robot is controlled in real time by an operator from Tau’s office. The cleaners have gone remote. @typespace_ai
❤2
Instagram has updated its logo for the first time in 10 years. The app's chief described the new design as cleaner and more modern. Reactions online have been mixed. @typespace_ai
😢5❤1
Telegram has launched a contest for Mini Apps developers. Show off your mini app and explain why it’s great. You have 48 hours to enter. Three winners will each receive 100 USDT. @typespace_ai
Telegram is offering $400 for doing something useful offline: cleaning up a park, mowing a neighbor’s lawn, or helping out in another way. The only requirement is to share before-and-after photos. Four winners will receive 100 USDT each from Telegram’s Intern Fund. The deadline is 72 hours. @typespace_ai
❤3🤯1😢1
A Samsung support employee accidentally sent a customer his chatbot prompt instead of a reply: Make a response to Tyler by acknowledging first his request and assurance to check if its allowed Brutal indeed. @typespace_ai
🤯3
OpenAI is removing limits: all users now have unlimited access to text chats. The default model has been updated to GPT-5.6 Luna. And starting next week, unlimited access to the new Think button for more complex questions will roll out. @typespace_ai
❤6👍1
Google has released a course on AI agents, from core principles to deploying them in real-world projects. It includes video lectures, practical coding assignments and useful resources. @typespace_ai
❤1
New renders of the foldable iPhone Ultra are here. It should launch in September alongside the iPhone 18 Pro. It will be 9-9.5 mm thick when folded and 4.5 mm when unfolded. Two color options: black and white. @typespace_ai
❤1😢1
Apple is holding a lottery for Apple Store employees to decide who gets to work at September event. The company reportedly plans to host it in-person, and demand among employees has far exceeded the number of available spots. Nest Apple's event is expected on September 8 or 9, where it’s likely to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro lineup and first foldable iPhones. @typespace_ai
Telegram was removed from the App Store worldwide. But only for a few hours. What happened: the messenger violated the platform’s rules related to child abuse. Later the developer quickly removed that content and blocked the author. Telegram is now available in the App Store again. @typespace_ai
😢2❤1
OpenAI’s new model, codenamed Astra, has achieved ten advances in mathematics and theoretical computer science. Scientists had worked on some of them for 40–50 years. Specifically: it made new upper bounds on sphere-packing density and disproof of a longstanding conjecture that certain groups are uniquely determined by their von Neumann algebras. All the discoveries are in the image. OpenAI calls Astra its future f…
❤3
Amazon has wasted $2 million because of a Claude Sonnet's blunder. The model was supposed to match author data with book listings. In the process, Sonnet went 860% over the project's budget, and five months later, it turned out the whole thing had been done wrong. Amazon management admitted that coding mistakes that used to be “trivially cheap” are proving catastrophically expensive. @typespace_ai
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @typespace_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,307,379 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Typespace Media [en]” (@typespace_ai), 48,810 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/typespace_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.