骗子昵称: HM-TG6-4 Yuanfang HMTG6-11组-Sauce鸿远) HM-TG6-4-Blurred J\K K 曝光账号:@yuanfang567 @WW668988 诈骗ID号:772187479 诈骗金额:3000u 收款地址: 行骗事件:皇马的四组远方,渠道费拖鞋不给各种确认就是不出,粉上了不给结账消息不回,皇马这那么大的台子都是这种人吗?下边员工说提成和工资都没结,皇马领导层没人处理下吗?垃圾台子就指着坑渠道和员工挣钱了?持续曝光 🔊不接广告;欢迎投稿 🔊曝光投稿请联系 @oddo

Channel
体育(百家乐)(电子)曝光🔊《官方频道》
@tybg8888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
10,006subscribers
-119 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001019668121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tybg8888 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tybg8888 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 10,006 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 10,014 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 10,034 | -43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 10,077 | -36 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 10,113 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 10,121 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 10,126 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 10,125 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 10,124 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 10,125 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 10,125 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.46%
- avg views ÷ 10,006 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (21 December 2025 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 46 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
309 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 21.7% | |
| ❤ | 65 | 21.0% | |
| 🎉 | 65 | 21.0% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 17.2% | |
| 🥰 | 32 | 10.4% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 8.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
杀猪台:钻石娱乐 飞投:@zuanshiyl_bot 死爹妈的畜生:烛龙|东南亚一条龙 id: @hnlll 龙啸天 id: @s33333 黑心客服ID:@zsvip 此平台也不是第一次被曝光,而且胜率极低,十个有十一个人输,赢了还不让你下分。为什么还是有人在玩,还是有不少群主给他们拉人?他们平台门槛低,玩家2u就能玩,代理拉玩家也能得到不错的报酬。大家觉得冲个几u几十u无所谓,就是因为我们充的这两u 才让他们这群狗东西被爆黑了还那么无所畏惧在各大群里还继续拉新 黑了款当作没有任何事情发生。甚至还有些群主为了利益把曝光信息删除 把曝光人拉黑踢出群,继续给黑平台拉人。呵呵,为了眼前的蝇头小利而把自己口碑砸了 值不值得? 🔊不接广告;欢迎投稿 🔊曝光投稿请联系 @oddo
🎉27👍26❤24🔥21
开云旗下 MK体育 柬埔寨飞投。飞机频道 开始黑钱了,有钱的抓紧取!!!!! 世界杯快到了 ,MK是不想做了,易换上面打广告也一样黑!各位盘总抓紧提款别,等跟我一样养肥了开杀! 我他妈玩足球篮球百家乐 说我异常投注,后面觉得说不通开始说我套利, 哈哈我真曹尼玛了MK体育! 我一个月输赢几百万,我套你妈利,彩金都没领过,就在那说套利。 现在开始悬赏 MK飞投 员工 组长 部长信息!提供的奖励一万U!!! 现在开始悬赏 MK飞投 员工 组长 部长信息!提供的奖励一万U!!! 🔊不接广告;欢迎投稿 🔊曝光投稿请联系 @oddo
🥰19❤16🎉16💯15👍14🔥8
大家注意了,2028 平台最近有传闻准备要卷钱跑路了,今天没事无聊去注册了个号充了 3000 去玩了下,打了差不多 10 杯水的百家乐,一分彩金没领,最后提款直接给我把账号封了,平台客服咨询不理人,飞机代理也不回复,一句解释都没有,这个和杀猪盘有什么区别,赢钱了直接封号,也不回复任何信息,必须曝光,这台子以后见到大家要小心了 🔊不接广告;欢迎投稿 🔊曝光投稿请联系 @oddo
🔥17❤15👍15🥰13💯12🎉10
投稿金鑫鲨鱼 中奖就说 不能买免费 非人工投注 金鑫杀大赔小 我还以为多大的格局 原来是全部换人了 投稿金鑫鲨鱼 中奖就说 不能买免费 非人工投注 金鑫杀大赔小 我还以为多大的格局 原来是全部换人了 🔊不接广告;欢迎投稿 🔊曝光投稿请联系 @oddo
🎉12👍12❤10🔥7
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @tybg8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“体育(百家乐)(电子)曝光🔊《官方频道》” (@tybg8888), 10,006 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tybg8888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.