Channel
@twoiim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,084subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001205058656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twoiim |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twoiim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 4,084 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 4,092 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 4,092 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 March 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 96 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
*100 days to CAT 2026. What exactly should you be doing from here?* In this video, Rajesh sir lays out a very clear plan for the final stretch — how to prepare VARC, LRDI and Quant in parallel, when to start mocks, what to prioritise, and why waiting to “finish the syllabus” is the wrong approach now. If your preparation feels scattered, or if you are starting seriously only now, watch this and build your next 100 …
Signed Two IIM
*100 days to CAT 2026. What exactly should you be doing from here?* In this video, Rajesh sir lays out a very clear plan for the final stretch — how to prepare VARC, LRDI and Quant in parallel, when to start mocks, what to prioritise, and why waiting to “finish the syllabus” is the wrong approach now. If your preparation feels scattered, or if you are starting seriously only now, watch this and build your next 100 …
Signed Two IIM
*Arithmetic is the bedrock of CAT Quant* . In this video, Rajesh sir explains the complete Arithmetic roadmap — what to learn first, how to group the topics, and how to move from Arithmetic into Algebra, Geometry and the rest of Quant. If you’re unsure how to structure your Quant prep, this is a very useful watch. Link - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9XI7ALBdgo
Signed Two IIM
*Arithmetic is the bedrock of CAT Quant* . In this video, Rajesh sir explains the complete Arithmetic roadmap — what to learn first, how to group the topics, and how to move from Arithmetic into Algebra, Geometry and the rest of Quant. If you’re unsure how to structure your Quant prep, this is a very useful watch. Link - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9XI7ALBdgo
Signed Two IIM
Starting CAT 2026 preparation in August? Don’t treat this as a dry run. In this video, Rajesh sir gives a complete 120-day roadmap—how to run fundamentals, practice and mocks in parallel, what to prioritise in VARC, LRDI and Quant, and why Arithmetic should anchor your Quant preparation. Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fAO9e5hOx0
❤1
Signed Two IIM
CAT 2026 Aspirants, *LRDI can feel scary not because the solutions are impossible, but because we often don’t know how to begin*. In this video, Rajesh sir explains how he thinks through LRDI sets — how to pre-screen, what clues to look for, when to stay, and when to move on. Very useful if DILR is the section that intimidates you. Link - https://youtu.be/QR807p-vIpo?si=L1Escpg2gl192X16
Signed Two IIM
CAT 2026 Aspirants, Starting prep in July? You still have 150 days. Rajesh sir has made a complete July–November plan covering Quant, LRDI, VARC, reading, mocks and revision. Very useful if you are wondering whether it is too late to start. 📺 https://youtu.be/j_TE5fjz_eo?si=iDOAkM8wCsW39cT8
Signed Two IIM
CAT 2026 Aspirants, We spoke to Devansh — 99.29%iler and SPJIMR convert. He talks about starting serious prep , section-wise strategy, mocks, DILR set selection, mock analysis, and what actually helped him improve. Very useful if you're wondering whether you can start now and still do well. 📺 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ir-9TBwYmU
Signed Two IIM
Most CAT aspirants memorise A+B+AB/100. Very few understand why it works. In this 7-minute video, we derive the formula from scratch so you never have to memorise it again. Link - https://youtu.be/dndw7isLjQg?si=sOfjGaCuYpmkLShS
Signed Two IIM
Most CAT aspirants memorise A+B+AB/100. Very few understand why it works. In this 7-minute video, we derive the formula from scratch so you never have to memorise it again. Link - https://youtu.be/dndw7isLjQg?si=sOfjGaCuYpmkLShS
Signed Two IIM
When should you start mocks? How many should you take? How do you analyse them? Rajesh sir answers all three. 📺 https://youtu.be/Q25Eur4lOAc?si=JVIJQJlPtFxVzxeN
❤1
Signed Two IIM
When should you start mocks? How many should you take? How do you analyse them? Rajesh sir answers all three. 📺 https://youtu.be/Q25Eur4lOAc?si=JVIJQJlPtFxVzxeN
Signed Two IIM
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @twoiim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2IIM CAT Preparation” (@twoiim), 4,084 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twoiim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.