Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for . . ﹫𝐓𝗐𝗂𝗇.𝒌𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝓘 nfꭷ !𐙚

Channel

. . ﹫𝐓𝗐𝗂𝗇.𝒌𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝓘 nfꭷ !𐙚

@twnklngg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002525957314
TypeChannel
Username@twnklngg
Created23 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/twnklngg

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2025, 04:52 UTC44 viewsread 24 August 2026
Poll

( 🌟 ) r⍺ting ch⍺nnel ;

  1. 🌟6%
  2. 🌟🌟0%
  3. 🌟🌟🌟0%
  4. 🌟🌟🌟🌟12%
  5. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jun 2025, 04:49 UTC45 views0 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🥤 ᠉﹙౾ ꒱ .' 🤍dmins﹫ե᭙‌nklng с⍺томu ( t.me/iallol ) - own лuфu ( t.me/l2ifi ) - m⍺in ⍺dmin зuф ( t.me/guswixxii ) - ⍺dmin кu⍺н⍺ ( t.me/kk1iana ) - ⍺dmin юмu ( t.me/ca1naa ) - ⍺dmin ūерu ( t.me/lile_yan ) - ⍺dmin юмэ ( t.me/wooaeni2 ) - ⍺dmin к⍺ūоко ( t.me/kayokololi ) - ⍺dmin джuллu ( t.me/GILLYKSA ) - ⍺dmin эвu ( t.me/eveli230 ) - ⍺dmin эсвuн ( t.me/flawwl3ss ) - ⍺dmin м⍺рк ( t.me/senxxw ) - ⍺dmin мэннu ( t.me/manny

23 Jun 2025, 04:36 UTC43 viewsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🥤 ᠉﹙౾ ꒱ .' 🤍h⍺nnel growth﹫ե᭙‌nklng ฅ st⍺rt - O5.O4🎀 1𝓞𝓞 . 19.O4 2𝓞𝓞 . 16.O6 3𝓞𝓞 . 4𝓞𝓞 . 5𝓞𝓞 .

23 Jun 2025, 04:32 UTC39 viewsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🥤 ᠉﹙౾ ꒱ .' 🤍utu⍺l pr ﹫ե᭙‌nklng ฅ ᭙‌rite — t.me/i⍺llol🎀 𝓞𝓞 1. дел⍺ем с к⍺н⍺л⍺мu 2ОО + 𝓞𝓞 2. дел⍺ем н⍺ 3О - 12О мuнут 𝓞𝓞 3. тем⍺тuка только uгры

23 Jun 2025, 04:26 UTC33 viewsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🥤 ᠉﹙౾ ꒱ .' 🤍utu⍺l ⍺rriv⍺l ﹫ե᭙‌nklng ฅ ᭙‌rite — t.me/i⍺llol🎀 𝓞𝓞 1. дел⍺ем с к⍺н⍺л⍺мu О - 3ОО подпuсчuков 𝓞𝓞 2. дел⍺ем н⍺ 2 - 5 𝓞𝓞 3. тем⍺тuка только uгры

23 Jun 2025, 04:26 UTC30 viewsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🥤 ᠉﹙౾ ꒱ .' 🤍oꪮper⍺𝗍𝗂𝗼𝗻 ﹫ե᭙‌nklng ฅ ᭙‌rite — t.me/i⍺llol🎀 𝓞𝓞 1. 15O + ( могут быть uсключенuя ) 𝓞𝓞 2. отпр⍺влять ш⍺блоны не более пятu р⍺з в день 𝓞𝓞 3. между своuмu ш⍺блон⍺мu дел⍺ть перерывы мuнuмум 40 мuнут 𝓞𝓞 4. во время uгры / ⍺нон т⍺ūм⍺ / добuв⍺ ссылок ш⍺блоны не выкл⍺дыв⍺ть 𝓞𝓞 5. еслu н⍺ к⍺н⍺ле уже есть ш⍺блон , подождuте 1О - 15 мuнут u только тогд⍺ выкл⍺дыв⍺ūте своū 𝓞𝓞 6. ш⍺блоны выкл⍺дыв⍺ть с 1О : ОО до 22 :

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @twnklngg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2025, 04:52 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

( 🌟 ) r⍺ting ch⍺nnel ;

  1. 🌟6%
  2. 🌟🌟0%
  3. 🌟🌟🌟0%
  4. 🌟🌟🌟🌟12%
  5. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟82%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 23 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“. . ﹫𝐓𝗐𝗂𝗇.𝒌𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝓘 nfꭷ !𐙚” (@twnklngg). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twnklngg.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.