Rave的偉大無需多言 笑死
💩12🤯6🎉2
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital

Channel
@tsucccctalktalk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,310subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001597501811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tsucccctalktalk |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tsucccctalktalk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 3,310 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 3,312 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 3,320 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 3,323 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 3,324 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 3,327 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 3,332 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 3,332 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 38.1% | |
| 💩 | 61 | 23.0% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 14.0% | |
| 🤯 | 16 | 6.04% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 3.02% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.64% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 1.89% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.13% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.13% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.755% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.377% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.377% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rave的偉大無需多言 笑死
💩12🤯6🎉2
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
《交易者的貨物崇拜與報復性交易》 引言:硬幣與幻覺 - 交易本身是一個零和,每一個成交價格都有對應的贏家以及輸家。 雖然金融的市場靠著信用以及財富、資源重新分配讓文明成長,讓我們處在一個緩慢但是強勢的正和飛輪當中。 但是在交易市場之中絕大多數的人只是將財富在互相轉移,沈浸在互相拋硬幣的遊戲當中。 在統計學的作用下,還是會有人一次連續性的丟出10次正面。 開始被稱為天才,接著,一整套理論、信仰與儀式就誕生了, 這就是交易員的「貨物崇拜」。 第一章:交易員的貨物崇拜 先來聊聊貨物崇拜是什麼, 「Cargo cult」最早出現在二戰期間的南太平洋島嶼。 當時美軍在島上建立軍事基地,飛機會空投大量物資(cargo)。 當戰爭結束、軍隊撤離後,物資也消失了。土著為求物資再現,模仿美軍建造木製飛機、模擬跑道和電台列隊操練。他們模仿了表象(ritual),卻不了解底層機制(system) 對我來說在金融市場的貨物崇拜是 看到…
❤24🎉1👎1🔥1
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
Coinglass剛剛壞了 現在才知道 單向的愛不能抵禦萬難 雙向奔赴才行 現在修好了 我又覺得我行了
🤯3🎉1
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
Magnificent Seven (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, NVDA, META, TSLA) 今年以來整體下跌。 但是你知道自2026年以來,Russell 2000 小型股指數已上漲將近 10%。 Russell 2000 已經於上週四已連續14個交易日 跑贏 S&P 500,創下自1996年以來最長紀錄。 這是我這幾天翻金融新聞時翻到的一篇文章,連結放下面。 我自己是偏向樂觀,如果資金從這幾家ai怪傑(apple例外)裡面流出來,其實才是真正考驗選股能力的時候,市場相對來說給的機會也會多一些。 某些程度來說搞不好也會流入其他的風險資產,包括crypto,大家的笑容才會比較容易出現在臉上。 這邊補上一些風險提示的觀點: 1. 小型股每次比較強勢的時候都會有一個市場傳說,也就是tax-loss selling,簡單來說金融機構可能在12月賣出一些虧損的小型股,認列損失減少稅務壓力,1月再把…
❤🔥7❤2🎉1👎1
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
https://youtu.be/bZ_ACaQTTcE?si=DL7Au3fmqr8YOOSW 最近DA的YT被狂暴限流 影片每一個都沒辦法被演算法推出去 我覺得這集做得蠻好看的 而且小琪的顏值還是水準以上 歡迎大家按讚分享出去 救救演算法
❤6💩4
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
https://youtu.be/Hg3mStr7UpI?si=TIBp702C_cAZbXQ7 沒想到有生之年可以看到全世界最佳戒賭漫畫動畫化…. Fx戰士要動畫化了..
❤4👎1
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
差點又成為賣飛故事 還好有二次上車….
👎16💩7❤3👌3☃2
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
前陣子Cmoney(股市同學會) 聯絡我,問我願不意跟他們辦合作課程。 最後經過幾次聊天討論大概會先用一次直播課程的方式來試試水溫。 但是他們也提到希望能拿出一些之前沒在外面講過的東西,我想了一陣子覺得主題可以是日內交易的框架架構,這也是我認為我最擅長的事之一。 如果可以的話可以先幫我填填這份問卷,這樣讓Cmoney比較好搜集數據。 據我所知這個課程應該是收費的,我其實還不知道最終定價多少,但是我打算扣除其他費用以及DA同仁們幫忙製作的費用之後。 直接把一部分拿出來做活動或是做個小抽獎。 問卷連結: https://www.surveycake.com/s/KWL9k (填了可以抽折價卷,你可以不用買我的,但是如果有其他人的好課可以拿這個折價卷買)
❤10💩8
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
吸取教訓 這次沒有被騙下車
👎12❤4
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
20%是我的極限不是MMT的極限 剛剛設了止盈就去睡一下 回來一看止盈了挺開心 打開K線就不太開心了
💩12🤯3😢3
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
最近得了賣飛病。 來聊聊大跌後的處理好了: 大跌後的一週通常都會有一個定價過程,什麼意思呢? 因為通常大跌過後本來大家對價格的預期會改變,看多的人可能轉為看空,看空的人可能會獲利離場。 而且大跌過程是非常快的,市場需要時間去消化。 我自己個人是不太願意再定價過程還沒完成之前去做買入或是做空大盤(BTC/ETH)。 所以一般來說這個時候會去尋找一些反彈比較強的山寨去做多。 當然,在這種情況下堅定持有也是一個課題。 像是SNX就是我格局小了
❤16🤯1
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
做空: 0.93 -> 0.79 —> 0.97 得而復失好痛苦..
🤡8
Signed Tsucccc| DA Capital
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tsucccctalktalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 267,279 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tsucccc交易碎碎念日記” (@tsucccctalktalk), 3,310 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tsucccctalktalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.