Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,505–5,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 15:37
5,508
-1
5 Oct 2026, 20:55
5,509
-2
28 Sept 2026, 17:01
5,511
+2
18 Sept 2026, 16:41
5,509
-1
14 Sept 2026, 18:55
5,510
+1
11 Sept 2026, 06:56
5,509
-3
6 Sept 2026, 03:57
5,512
-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:05
5,515
-2
29 Aug 2026, 14:02
5,517
-2
26 Aug 2026, 08:53
5,519
-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:14
5,521
-1
20 Aug 2026, 11:51
5,522
-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:46
5,524
-1
13 Aug 2026, 16:47
5,525
-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:18
5,526
-4
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
5,530
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:27
5,530
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,175 reactions across 13 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
606
27.9%
👍
578
26.6%
🔥
439
20.2%
🎉
214
9.84%
🎄
145
6.67%
😍
32
1.47%
🍾
29
1.33%
☃
26
1.20%
🥰
25
1.15%
👎
24
1.10%
😢
14
0.644%
💯
12
0.552%
😁
9
0.414%
❤🔥
8
0.368%
😨
7
0.322%
🐳
3
0.138%
🤝
2
0.092%
🤓
1
0.046%
🤣
1
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trustdoit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ориджинали Псыж сейчас не с нами.
Логичный вопрос, если мы тут новых Псыжей кормим, а где тот самый Псыж?
Рассказываю.
Тот самый Псыж, как помните, сначала сменил улицу на базу, потом базу на квартиру, а теперь — с квартиры переехал в частный дом.
Так сказать, улучшил свои жилищные условия.
Зимой перед поездкой на Дальний Восток у нас встал вопрос с двумя решениями:
1. Оставлять его снова на базе, снова строить …
🇨🇳 Не только ради выставки приехали в этот раз в Китай.
Уже две недели здесь мы вспоминаем что такое путешествие. Правда формат не такой как привыкли. Вместо колёс у нас самолеты, скоростные поезда и метро. Непривычно, но это же Китай. Так просто сюда на машине не попасть.
И маршрут у нас не по природным объектам, а по городам.
Начали с Харбина, потом был Шанхай, Сунчжоу, Пекин, а сейчас мы в Чунцине.
Транспорт в …
🔉 Знатоки китайского имеются?
Кого там ругают, и за что?😂
П.С.
Как ты уже понимаешь — на дворе март, а значит мы по традиции в Китае.
На выставке автодомов и всего, что с этим связано. Если есть пожелания, что показать, то пиши. Поснимаем 👌
49 дней без новостей про политику, ЧП и подобного.
49 идеальных дней.
Как я к этому пришёл?
Если коротко, то — Дальний Восток.
Если подробнее, то с первого раза, когда побывал на востоке нашей страны — я будто попал в другой мир. И каждый раз возвращаясь сюда, испытывал всё время одно и тоже чувство: мне становилось очень далеко до всего что происходит в мире.
После 22-го года это стало ещё заметнее.
Уже рассказы…
Какой-то бракованный год получился.
Как будто бы дней не доложили.
Пусть это будет моя апология к всему что написано далее.
И с одной стороны не припомню год в котором я был настолько активен и продуктивен. Судя по статистике с умных часов я меньше спал и больше двигался. Наездил в два раза больше километров, чем в прошлом. И в тоже время за год не достигнул ни одной поставленной цели.
С другой стороны, можно найт…
Прибрались, распихали вещи обратно в шкафы, протёрли пыль, помыли полы, навели уюта.
Без сил 😌
❤110👍53🥰24🔥13😍4👎1
Signed Denis Isaev
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @trustdoit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Denis Isaev (TRUSTDOIT)” (@trustdoit), 5,508 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trustdoit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.