Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Нотатки баєра

@traffic_treba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,184subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001812565111
TypeChannel
Username@traffic_treba
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/traffic_treba

Growth

1,1841,1871,185.57 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,184 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,184–1,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:131,184-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:031,187no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:501,187first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 1,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 September 202530 July 2026)
Views total495
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC206 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Що лиєте?

  1. Дейтинг20%
  2. Гембла31%
  3. Крипта/бінарки7%
  4. Мфо6%
  5. Інше36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC289 viewsread 7 August 2026

👋Колеги по цеху, як ваші справи? Втратився сенс ведення каналу, так як ціль була бути корисним та в перспективі познайомитись з класними людьми зі сфери, можливо взяти до себе декілька баєрів. Канал був не поганий, відмотуючи історію перший пост був 1 грудня 2022 року. *тоді ще не було тренду такого як зараз, що всі один на перед одного роблять канали та пишуть пости через АІ в більшості вигадані, кароч нема душі в

16 Jan 2026, 12:43 UTC816 viewsread 7 August 2026

для кращої якості запустив 40+ без advantage+, клік по норм ціні, ctr тоже, але лідів 0 запустив окремо advantage+ 35+ і є ліди поки не розумію як залити не адвантедж, таке враження ніби фб не показує тим кому треба з advantage+

15 Jan 2026, 10:22 UTC840 viewsread 7 August 2026

клік по скільки має бути, шоб залити в плюс? 0.01 чи безкоштовний дейт скам?

15 Jan 2026, 10:20 UTC798 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а тут чого 0 лідів, хто скаже? і це не ІОС, це просто М 40+

15 Jan 2026, 09:49 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

так як вчора писав, запустив сьогодні окремо 4 компанії на ios як думаєте скільки лідів на таку статку? ноль, 00000🫨

14 Jan 2026, 18:43 UTC679 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Яке ROI в дейті рахується окей?

  1. 20-30%61%
  2. 40-60%13%
  3. 60-80%6%
  4. 80-100%+20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jan 2026, 18:25 UTC619 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я ще завжди дивлюсь на продутки які тестую. Не вважаю себе експертом, але думав що сайти знайомст виглядаю якось краще. Дизайн слабкий, щоб пройти реєстрацію потрібна тільки gmail пошта, яку не всі в європі мають, а багато користуються своїми локальними сервісами + до цього всього лист підтвердження падає в спам, що ше важче дядько 50 років його знайти…. ну таке собі, але якщо продукти є, вони якось монетизують це вс

14 Jan 2026, 18:12 UTC591 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрий вечір! Все таки я не здаюсь і продовжую мучити дейтинг. Єдине питання яке в мене залишається крім реджектів, це якість трафіку. Пролив реклу капи, на адвантедж+ компаніях з рекомендованим віком 35-40+ Трафік не підходить, і просять більше ІОС і веб. Запустив на ІОС і на ВЕБ окремі компанії. Конверту 0, кліків багато але лідів немає взагалі. Шо робити? поки хз… Перезапускаю на завтра більше компаній ІОС, і б

28 Nov 2025, 12:35 UTC766 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрий день! Не тестив дейтинг, займався основною вертикалью. Планую повернутись до запусків по дейту, але зараз маю пропозицію. Можливо ти таргетолог який працював з білими проектами і хочеш стати арбітражником напиши мені, можливо попрацюємо. Також якщо ти арбітражник але маєш досвід в білих заливах, також напиши. @kitvmishky

24 Sept 2025, 13:45 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 7 August 2026

не знаю з чим це повязано, але по всіх оферах з 17 числа пішла просадка. це я не тільки про дейт, тому поки зменшую обєми, залишаю тільки профітне і нове не запускаю. не дуже вірю в теаорію заговору що це закінчення кварталу і тд, але можливо це правда... по дейту ситуація така: us офери які почав лити в плюс виключили так як немає більше капи nld я так і не зміг законвертити в плюс + там реджектить приготую нові к

18 Sept 2025, 09:15 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Якби я намалював ось такі цифри — думаю всім було б цікавіше. Але я не люблю пизд??? а люблю робити, і думаю краще якщо з умовно 100-200$ спенду в день, в лайві я покажу (якщо вийде) дойти до 500-1000$/дайлі а не буду розказувати якісь казки, щоб в мене шоп купив рекламу за 200$

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @traffic_treba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Що лиєте?

  1. Дейтинг20%
  2. Гембла31%
  3. Крипта/бінарки7%
  4. Мфо6%
  5. Інше36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jan 2026, 18:43 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

Яке ROI в дейті рахується окей?

  1. 20-30%61%
  2. 40-60%13%
  3. 60-80%6%
  4. 80-100%+20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нотатки баєра” (@traffic_treba), 1,184 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/traffic_treba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.