15 measurements spanning 19 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,974–4,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 02:36
3,979
-5
23 Aug 2026, 12:38
3,984
-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:17
3,985
-6
19 Aug 2026, 17:46
3,991
no change
19 Aug 2026, 16:42
3,991
-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:13
3,995
no change
16 Aug 2026, 06:17
3,995
-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:45
4,000
-2
13 Aug 2026, 02:48
4,002
-5
10 Aug 2026, 21:31
4,007
no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:21
4,007
-4
7 Aug 2026, 09:01
4,011
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:51
4,011
-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:21
4,012
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:45
4,012
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
479 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
367
76.6%
🔥
31
6.47%
custom 5454352232466107069
27
5.64%
custom 5372917041193828849
20
4.18%
👍
15
3.13%
custom 5453886962953900063
12
2.51%
⚡
7
1.46%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradersti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎥 Друзья, нужна ваша поддержка.
Один из наших пользователей записал большой и подробный обзор сервиса. Мы его не просили и не писали сценарий. Человек просто решил поделиться своим опытом и показать, как всё работает.
Такие видео вызывают гораздо больше доверия, потому что это взгляд со стороны.
Если у вас будет пара минут, поддержите автора:
👍поставьте лайк;
💬оставьте комментарий;
📤если обзор показался полезным,…
BTC
Классический нисходящий канал , пробить канал не смогли.
Сейчас будет распил и медленно до 68500
Жду именно в этой зоне - фибо уровня 0.618. Начало появления сигнала на продажи.
При неудачном тестировании, обычно происходит подтверждение. И продолжение движения в тренде.
✅Индикатор должен показать сигнал ближе к среде.
Мой бот только, что закрыл позицию с прибылью в 6400 USDT.
Я настроил его на торговлю по сигналам индикатора с плечом 3х - минимальные риски....
Настроил его месяц назад и это его первая действительно ощутимая прибыль.
Индикатор, показывает точки разворота. @maxtradbot
В данный момент выбираю - просто держать монеты!
НЕ ПРОДАВАЙТЕ 💰
В свободное время занимаюсь развитием проекта @alipayp2p и путешествую.
🙂 Всем добра , подписывайтесь на AlipayP2P.
Нужно скать место, где ты хочешь торговать.
Где ты видишь, как рынок начинает показывать реальные сигналы.
Если забыли базу, то повторите!
t.me/maxtradbot/baza
Соло-предприниматель.
И немного удачи 🍀
Рынок показал: один человек уже может собрать сильный продукт, запустить его, довести до ума и вырастить в хороший проект.
👍 - www.alipayer.online
сейчас как раз находится на этапе органического роста.
Проект развивается, обрастает новыми возможностями и при этом уже почти полностью автоматизирован.
Для меня это не просто сервис. Это история про идею, реализацию и постоянно…
Как пополнить Alipay / WeChat из России в 2026
Если коротко:
мы это уже сделали за вас.
Я долго наблюдал, как люди мучаются с переводами, ловят блокировки, ищут какие-то мутные обменники… и в итоге либо переплачивают, либо теряют деньги.
Поэтому сделали свой сервис.
Что по факту:
1️⃣Пополняете Alipay или WeChat прямо со своей карты
(Сбер, Т-Банк, ВТБ — не важно)
1️⃣Оплата через СБП
1️⃣Можно платить даже с кредит…
⚡7👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tradersti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,067,568 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TraderSTI” (@tradersti), 3,979 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradersti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.