Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ton Stenka

@tonstenka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,258subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002505423764
TypeChannel
Username@tonstenka
CreatedBetween 1 February 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonstenka

Growth

3,2583,2803,2697 August 2026 — 3,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,280 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,275 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,258 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,255–3,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:383,258-17
8 Aug 2026, 10:283,275-5
7 Aug 2026, 16:163,280no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:033,280first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.98%
avg views ÷ 3,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held20 (5 April 202615 July 2026)
Views total97
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4035.1%
🔥3631.6%
👍2017.5%
1714.9%
💯10.877%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonstenka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC97 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С последним обновлением перестали загружаться недавние действия/изменения на канале, если недавно совершались таковые с md-сообщениями.

Signed ꘜ Igor Zolin [DCT]

11 Jun 2026, 18:55 UTC271 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Telegram получил Markdown-оформление теперь в мессенджере можно делать заголовки, таблицы, списки, цитаты и блоки кода.

🔥322

Signed NØTME

1 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC273 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Toncoin становится GRAM.

Signed ꘜ Igor Zolin [DCT]

25 May 2026, 15:11 UTC182 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @anatolii_makosov

Следующая техническая цель: повышение производительности шардчейна При нормальной нагрузке TON работает на одном шардчейне. При пиковых нагрузках активируется динамический шардинг: сеть разделяется на несколько шардчейнов, увеличивая пропускную способность при сохранении статичных комиссий. В этом режиме время выполнения операций может вырасти на несколько секунд. TON 2026.05 — первый релиз в новой серии обновлений

42🔥2

Signed NØTME

4 May 2026, 15:13 UTC276 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Реакция положительная

43🔥3

Signed ꘜ Igor Zolin [DCT]

4 May 2026, 15:01 UTC238 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Комиссии в TON упали в 6 раз — почти до нуля Следующий шаг — Telegram заменит TON Foundation в качестве движущей силы TON и станет его крупнейшим валидатором Акцент на технологическое превосходство Новый сайт, новые инструменты для разработчиков, новые улучшения производительности Сроки — 2–3 недели 🪙 Это шаг 3 из 7 к Make TON Great Again

👍32🔥2

Signed NØTME

4 May 2026, 08:41 UTC166 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://ton.org/ 💎

31🔥1

Signed NØTME

30 Apr 2026, 19:55 UTC247 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Валидаторы проголосовали за снижение сетевых комиссий в 6 раз

43🔥2

Signed NØTME

30 Apr 2026, 09:46 UTC126 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$NOT listed on Revolut 🇪🇺 70 million users across Europe can now access it probably nothing 💎

3👍2🔥2

Signed NØTME

27 Apr 2026, 12:50 UTC170 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Blockchain Finality Race

👍2🔥21

Signed NØTME

23 Apr 2026, 17:19 UTC206 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Через неделю комиссии в сети TON снизятся в 6 раз — до всего 0.00039 TON ($0.0005) за транзакцию Сумма будет фиксированной вне зависимости от нагрузки сети Вскоре после этого большинство транзакций станут полностью бесплатными. Нулевая комиссия

2👍2🔥2

Signed NØTME

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonstenka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 884,737 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ton Stenka” (@tonstenka), 3,258 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonstenka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.