Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TON Mafia

Channel

TON Mafia

@tonmafiaonton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,972subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002185251790
TypeChannel
Username@tonmafiaonton
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonmafiaonton

Growth

1,9721,9961,9847 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,996 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,983 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,977 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,972 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,968–2,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:081,972-5
14 Aug 2026, 22:231,977-6
11 Aug 2026, 14:361,983-12
8 Aug 2026, 11:401,995-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:021,996no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:151,996first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5948.8%
🔥2823.1%
😁129.92%
👍108.26%
👏64.96%
🥰54.13%
🤔10.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonmafiaonton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 30 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,180 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

he was lucky) congratulations @s0meone_u_know

👏64🔥1

Signed Умарчик | Ton

24 Mar 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,150 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

No luck ( t.me/nft/TimelessBook-7270

👍6

Signed Умарчик | Ton

24 Mar 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Jason - Cryptochef76

19 Mar 2026, 19:24 UTC936 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Lucky for the first time 🍀

5

Signed Умарчик | Ton

19 Mar 2026, 19:22 UTC732 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Looks decent 🐸❤️

5🔥1🥰1

Signed DannyEgg

12 Mar 2026, 21:18 UTC688 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Tends to happen in the bear and more good times to come 🔥🔥

2

Signed Jason - Cryptochef76

12 Mar 2026, 21:15 UTC652 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Everyone's quieted down:(

🤔1

Signed Умарчик | Ton

14 Feb 2026, 08:12 UTC883 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

GM and Happy Valentines day Mafia fam🐸❤️ Spread love and spend quality time with those you love today 🧸❤️‍🩹

12🥰4🔥3👍2

Signed DannyEgg

13 Feb 2026, 14:51 UTC860 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Never said anything about that ahaha

😁5🔥31

Signed Zenith | Denis

13 Feb 2026, 10:36 UTC896 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

dont dare to take my admin role

5🔥2

Signed Gio

13 Feb 2026, 10:09 UTC852 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hey all, I think it’s time that we get back to this?

4🔥1

Signed Zenith | Denis

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonmafiaonton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TON Mafia” (@tonmafiaonton), 1,972 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonmafiaonton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.