Забрал первый турик Trix и вроде очень даже окупился Заходите в Trix и тоже ловите хорошие иксы со мной
custom 54589084926874972061

Channel
@ton_advocat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,938subscribers
-110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002699563197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ton_advocat |
| Created | Between 1 April 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ton_advocat |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 1,938 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 1,941 | -25 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 1,966 | -11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 1,977 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:34 | 1,983 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 1,995 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,001 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 2,013 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 2,021 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 2,022 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 2,030 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 2,036 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 2,048 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 2,048 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458908492687497206 | 51 | 47.2% | |
| custom 5458893473186862388 | 23 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5307576466769193020 | 12 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5402432327034874281 | 10 | 9.26% | |
| custom 5296574998234800495 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| custom 5386399931378440814 | 3 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5328237290982486305 | 2 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ton_advocat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 February 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Забрал первый турик Trix и вроде очень даже окупился Заходите в Trix и тоже ловите хорошие иксы со мной
custom 54589084926874972061
Всем привет! После значительной паузы мы снова возвращаемся к активному ведению этого тгк. В последнее время у нас были другие дела и приоритеты, из-за которых не получалось уделять ему достаточно внимания. Но теперь мы снова готовы работать над каналом и развивать его. Совсем скоро всё вернётся в привычный ритм, как только восстановится актив. Вас снова ждут розыгрыши, интересный контент, а также небольшое обновле…
custom 54589084926874972065
🪙Solana — одна из самых дешёвых крупных сетей по медианной комиссии Середина января 2026📊 * Solana: ~$0.0008 * Base: ~$0.0030 * Ethereum: ~$0.019 Polygon / Linea / Arbitrum / BNB в среднем дороже Solana. Важно: это медиана, то есть “обычная” стоимость, а не пики в перегрузках. ⚙️ Почему так дёшево: высокая пропускная способность и параллельное исполнение → меньше скачков комиссий; нет зависимости от calldata/set…
custom 54589084926874972066custom 54024323270348742812
Белый дом + процент от стейкинга стейблкоина = главный политический драйвер недели для крипты. Что это значит на практике? 1) Сценарии после встречи (10 февраля): Жёсткий вариант: запрет/сильное ограничение “rewards/interest” → удар по моделям CEX-вознаграждений и части CeFi-продуктов. Компромисс: разрешают “непроцентные” бонусы/активити-rewards (платежи/лояльность), а “просто за хранение” режут → рынок может выдо…
custom 54588934731868623883custom 54589084926874972063custom 53075764667691930202custom 54024323270348742811
Сегодня, 10 февраля, в Белом доме снова сводят за одним столом банкиров и крипто-индустрию — и на самом деле спор там не “про крипту”, а про контроль над цифровыми долларами. Ключевой конфликт: можно ли платить доход/вознаграждения за хранение стейблкоинов. Крипто-компании говорят: это нормальная “фича” современного финансового продукта и конкуренция за пользователя. Банки отвечают: это начинает выглядеть как депози…
custom 54589084926874972063custom 54588934731868623882custom 53075764667691930201custom 54024323270348742811
В США организатора схемы “pig butchering” Daren Li приговорили к 20 годам: через соцсети и дейтинг жертв “прогревали”, вели на фейковые трейдинг-сайты и выманивали деньги ( ≈$73.6 млн отмыли через подставные компании). Красные флаги мошенничества: * “случайное” знакомство → сразу разговор про инвестиции * обещают доход без риска * ссылка на “биржу”/сайт, о котором никто не слышал + давление срочно внести деньги * “…
custom 54589084926874972062custom 54024323270348742811custom 54588934731868623881
РФ начала ограничивать/замедлять Telegram Несколько источников со ссылкой на RBC пишут, что Роскомнадзор с 10 февраля начал вводить меры по частичному ограничению работы Telegram (фактически — замедление/ограничение доступа)
custom 52965749982348004953custom 54024323270348742811
TON Pay: TON Foundation хочет превратить Telegram в «крипто-кассу» для Mini Apps TON Foundation запустила TON Pay — платежный SDK, который должен упростить приём крипты внутри Telegram: для мерчантов и разработчиков Мини-Аппов это позиционируется как wallet-agnostic слой оплаты (работает с разными кошельками). Что обещают: * один SDK вместо “зоопарка” с кошельками/чекаутом/сеттлментом; интеграция прямо в Mini Apps…
custom 53075764667691930204custom 54588934731868623883custom 52965749982348004952custom 54589084926874972062custom 54024323270348742811
🇫🇷 Франция: похищение “под криптовыкуп” — задержали 6 человек, включая несовершеннолетнего Во Франции полиция задержала шесть подозреваемых (включая несовершеннолетнего) по делу о похищении 35-летней магистратки и её 67-летней матери. По версии прокуратуры Лиона, преступники требовали выкуп в криптовалюте и выбрали жертв из-за связи семьи с криптосектором: партнёр магистратки занимает руководящую позицию в крипто-ст…
custom 54589084926874972064custom 54024323270348742811
Telegram снова “штормит” в России По данным материалов со ссылкой на Downdetector, за сутки — около 1000 сообщений о неполадках Telegram. Чаще жалуются на Карелию, Калужскую, Муромскую области, Удмуртию и Коми. Типовые проблемы: не грузятся видео/доки/голосовые/«кружки», не входит аккаунт, не приходят уведомления. Проблемы со связью/интернетом по регионам Сообщают о сбоях связи/интернета в ряде регионов (в т.ч. Мо…
custom 52965749982348004952custom 53282372909824863051custom 54024323270348742811custom 54589084926874972061
Победители еженедельной раздачи подарков в чате 🎁 Ставьте реакции, общайтесь, получайте призы 🎁
custom 54588934731868623883custom 54589084926874972063
Топ1 в Стейкинг Balls 🤩и ✅ верификации подарили 🍾 Жалею, что не зашел раньше, но время еще есть 😂
custom 54588934731868623883
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ton_advocat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоАдвокат” (@ton_advocat), 1,938 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ton_advocat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.