Channel
@tiyu001
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393630167 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiyu001 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiyu001 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 222 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 236 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 236 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (11 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 193 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
欧超杯 ⏰03:00 队伍：巴黎圣日耳曼 vs 维拉 推荐：全场大2.5/3 比分：2-1 3-1 3-2 重心：❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 自由杯 ⏰06:00 队伍：普拉滕斯竞技 vs 科金博联合 推荐：科金博联合 +0.5 比分：0-0 0-1 自由杯 ⏰06:00 队伍：帕尔梅拉斯SP vs 波特诺山丘 推荐：帕尔梅拉斯SP 单队大1.5/2 比分：2-0 3-0 南美杯 ⏰06:15 队伍：布拉甘蒂诺红牛SP vs 米内罗竞技 推荐：米内罗竞技 +0.5 比分：0-2 1-2 阿根廷杯 ⏰06:15 队伍：图库曼竞技 vs 独立竞技 推荐：图库曼竞技 +0.5 比分：1-0 1-1 联赛杯 ⏰08:00 队伍：蒙特雷 vs 纳什维尔 推荐：纳什维尔 0 比分：0-2 1-2 足球二串：维拉 全场大2.5/3⚡️纳什维尔 0
中国斯诺克公开赛 8月12日 【19：30】 肖国栋 vs 肖恩·墨菲 推荐：全场肖恩·墨菲-1.5 8月12日 【19：30】 诺蓬·桑坎 vs 罗尼·奥沙利文 推荐：全场诺蓬·桑坎+2.5
欧冠杯 02:15 队伍：采列-阿拉特亚美尼亚 推荐：双进（是） 欧冠杯 02:30 队伍：格拉茨风暴-费内巴切 推荐：格拉茨风暴（+0.5/1） 欧冠杯 03:00 队伍：里昂-布拉格斯巴达 ♥️ 推荐：里昂（-1.5） 二串一：里昂+圣吉罗斯
欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 考诺萨基列斯 vs 萨格勒布迪纳摩 (12/08 01:00) 大(2.5/3) @ 1.89 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 奈梅亨 vs 奥林匹亚科斯 (12/08 01:30) 奈梅亨(0) @ 2.04 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 贝尔格莱德红星 vs 比尔舒华夏普尔 (12/08 02:00) 贝尔格莱德红星(-1.5/2) @ 1.79 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 布拉迪斯拉发 vs 米亚尔比 (12/08 02:15) 小(2.5) @ 1.97 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 NK采列 vs 阿拉特阿美尼亚 (12/08 02:15) 阿拉特阿美尼亚(+1/1.5) @ 1.87 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 格拉茨 vs 费内巴切 (12/08 02:30) 费内巴切(-0.5/1) @ 1.96 欧洲冠军联赛预选赛 里昂 vs 布拉格斯巴达 (12/08 03:00) 小(3) @ 2.00 均注盈利
亚冠精英 ⏰17:30 队伍：阿德莱德联 vs 河内公安 推荐：全场大3 澳足总 ⏰17:30 队伍：莱德 vs 麦克阿瑟FC 推荐：双方进球（是） 澳足总 ⏰17:30 队伍：昆士兰狮队 vs 墨尔本城 推荐：全场大2.5/3 友谊赛 ⏰18:00 队伍：尤文图斯 vs 巴勒莫 推荐：尤文图斯 -1/1.5 比分：2-0 3-0 4-0 重心：❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 亚冠精英 ⏰18:30 队伍：江原FC vs 大阪钢巴 推荐：大阪钢巴 0 比分：1-1 1-2 足球二串：尤文图斯 -1/1.5⚡️大阪钢巴 0。
0️⃣【星空-8月12日 0点整 欧冠资 沙巴巴库 vs 奥胡斯】 数据方面机构开出主队让0.5，给予状态的支持。沙巴巴库近期状态较为稳定，近10场取得6胜1平3负，球队整体表现较为出色，攻防两端保持较好的平衡。作为阿塞拜疆联赛劲旅，沙巴巴库在欧冠资格赛中具备一定主场优势，主场作战时往往能够展现更强的比赛节奏和控制能力。奥胡斯近10场取得5胜3平2负，整体发挥同样不错，但客场面对欧战级别对手时，稳定性仍需考验。综合双方近期状态和主场因素来看，沙巴巴库在比赛掌控力方面略占优势，有望凭借主场优势取得主动。综合分析，本场更看好沙巴巴库主场取胜。 全场让球：沙巴巴库[email protected] 全场大小：小2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-0
【8月2日 18点整 中超 青岛西海岸 vs 青岛海牛】 数据方面机构开出主队让0.5/1，给予实力的认可。青岛西海岸近10场比赛取得4胜4平2负，联赛排名第5，本赛季表现较为稳健。青岛海牛近10场仅1胜2平7负，联赛排名跌至第16位，近期状态低迷，攻防两端问题较为明显。作为同城德比，青岛西海岸无论是积分位置还是近期状态都占据明显优势，本场坐镇主场有望进一步拉开与对手的差距。综合来看，本场看好青岛西海岸主场取胜。 全场让球：青岛西海岸-0.5/[email protected] 全场大小：小2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
挪威超级联赛 费德列斯达 VS 桑讷菲尤尔 08-01 22:00 全场让球 [欧洲盘] 费德列斯达 -0/0.5 @ 2.07 瑞典超级联赛 赫根 VS 卡尔马 08-01 21:00 角球大小 [欧洲盘] 大 10.5 @ 1.87 2串1
2026-08-01 19:00 中国超级联赛 天津津门虎 v 云南玉昆 足球 让球 云南玉昆 +0 / 0.5 2026-08-01 19:35 中国超级联赛 北京国安 v 浙江 足球 角球数 - 大 / 小 大 10 2026-08-01 19:35 中国超级联赛 上海海港 v 山东泰山 足球 让球 上海海港 -0.5 2026-08-01 20:00 中国超级联赛 成都蓉城 v 武汉三镇 足球 让球 武汉三镇 +1.5
0️⃣【星空-7月16日 3点整 世界杯 英格兰 vs 阿根廷】 数据初盘开出全场让球平手盘，机构倾向两队均势。2026世界杯半决赛，英格兰已斩获四连胜，球队防守稳固，状态良好，整体表现稳定。阿根廷虽然本届已斩获六连胜，但前场把握进球能力有所下降，状态回落。两队最近一场交锋英格兰3-2击败阿根廷，淘汰赛整体发挥相对也更为出色，综合分析本场看好英格兰获胜晋级决赛。 全场让球：英格兰[email protected] 全场大小：大2/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-1
2026-7-15 早场足球精选(老赵) 韩国杯 ⏰18:00 队伍：全南天龙 vs 忠南牙山 亚盘：忠南牙山 -0 比分：0-1 1-1 1-2 韩国杯 ⏰18:00 队伍：昌原 vs 金海市 亚盘：昌原 +0/0.5 比分：0-0 1-1 2-1 韩国杯 ⏰18:00 队伍：蔚山市民 vs 首尔衣恋 亚盘：全场大2.5 比分：1-2 1-3 韩国杯 ⏰18:00 队伍：安山绿人 vs 晋州市民 亚盘：安山绿人 -0.5/1 比分：2-0 3-0 2-1 韩国杯 ⏰18:00 队伍：釜山运输 vs 水原三星 亚盘：釜山运输 +1 比分：2-1 1-2 2-2 韩国杯 ⏰18:30 队伍：天安城 vs 木浦 亚盘：木浦 +1/1.5 比分：0-0 1-1 2-2 亚盘二串：首尔衣恋 全场大2.5⚡️木浦 +1/1.5
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tiyu001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,149,050 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“体育电竞资讯频道” (@tiyu001), 222 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiyu001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.