Lucy Mochi 🍡 https://t.me/+jX4VMSlA-4M1OGQy 181 uncensored videos on a private channel 🔞 https://t.me/+6I-cxwBZ9r8zZjQ6 https://t.me/VIP_group_bbot?start=ctgr_210250

Channel
Тик Ток 18+
@tik_tok_18p
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,385subscribers
-331 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001744397052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tik_tok_18p |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tik_tok_18p |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 12,385 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 12,396 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 12,388 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 12,402 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 12,398 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 12,397 | -29 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 12,426 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 12,446 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:03 | 12,460 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:24 | 12,467 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 12,471 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 12,484 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 12,490 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 12,492 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 12,506 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 12,516 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 12,530 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 12,527 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 12,532 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 12,552 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.4%
- avg views ÷ 12,385 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,540
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.051%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,645 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24m 17s
- Average length
- 1m 09s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 58.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 33.3% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🩷💙 ➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥 ➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥 ➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥
➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥
1) Jameliz Benitez Smith 2) Gracie bon 3) Sophie Rain 4) Ms Sethii 💋 Shilpa Sethi ➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥 Anna kopf onlyannakopf https://t.me/+GCEXflbxfxw4MDIy Gracie Bon @GracieBonn2 Jameliz Benitez Smith @Jameliz_jellybean_on Ms Sethii 💋 Shilpa Sethi https://t.me/+hv0sol7QoLk4Njcy lilly wu @lillywuX Erika Calabrese @ErikaCalabrese_free bufalika https://t.me/+pQPdDe4mB985M2Iy evana maria evanama…
➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥 Matildem https://t.me/+2tPtHwm_7Cg5OWU6 Darli Karina https://t.me/+WDXdJhLdKypmZThi Ava Reyes https://t.me/+M4uH_U-6SQ5hYWUy Angel Ferrnandez https://t.me/+4ZoFvdQvw_JmNzEy luvhannazuki https://t.me/+le-tUkU1eDswYjRi KATIANA KAY @KATIANA_KAY_free MissMiaFit https://t.me/+qZsZVipOKGU4MTg6 Helenaakln | Helena Zoe Klein https://t.me/+x-frY1a1YyoyNzdi bhadbhabie https://t.me/+2fLy…
❤1🔥1
Ms Sethii 💋 Shilpa Sethi https://t.me/+3lpD2Gbd-qA4ZmFi Private channel. 422 hot videos without censorship🔞🥵 ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/VIPGrou1p_bot?start=ctgr_175780 or https://t.me/+XqUczbT6OxcwY2Ni
@GracieBonn2 PRIVATE CHANNEL🔞 714 photo and 128 videos Uncensored waiting for you https://t.me/VIPGrou1p_bot?start=ctgr_155393 OR https://t.me/+1x4rkLEm7E9lZTBi
➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥
Alanna Pow🔞 https://t.me/+sB11YxnpLoU4YzUy Private - https://t.me/VIPGrou1p_bot?start=ctgr_177817 or click here - https://t.me/+pqqaL-t1Au5hODJi
➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS 💦
Ms Sethii 💋 Shilpa Sethi https://t.me/+3lpD2Gbd-qA4ZmFi Private channel. 422 hot videos without censorship🔞🥵 ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/VIPGrou1p_bot?start=ctgr_175780 or https://t.me/+XqUczbT6OxcwY2Ni
➡️ ALL YOUR FAVORITE MODELS ❤️🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @tik_tok_18p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@GracieBonn2 · 3,22218 postsErika Calabrese
@ErikaCalabrese_free · 7,96417 postsJameliz Benitez Smith OnlyFans Jellybean
@Jameliz_jellybean_on · 8,41517 postsAishah Sofey 🔥
@AishahSofey_on · 5,99716 postsKATIANA KAY
@KATIANA_KAY_free · 2,78816 postslillywuX
@lillywuX · 1,85516 postsjazmine iamjazminesinging
@jazmine_VIP · 1401 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тик Ток 18+” (@tik_tok_18p), 12,385 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tik_tok_18p.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.