Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 夏日饮品店

Channel

夏日饮品店

@tianpinwu2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,140subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004413012024
TypeChannel
Username@tianpinwu2026
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 5 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tianpinwu2026

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0931,1401,116.54 September 2026 — 1,093 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,093 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,120 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,129 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,137 subscribers26 September 2026 — 1,140 subscribers4 September 202626 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,086–1,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 12:201,140+3
15 Sept 2026, 02:181,137+8
11 Sept 2026, 15:171,129+9
6 Sept 2026, 20:001,120+27
4 Sept 2026, 11:221,093no change
4 Sept 2026, 10:471,093first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.3%
avg views ÷ 1,140 subscribers
Avg views / post
641
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.166%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total8,337
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC121 viewsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:9.4 【验证人】:Zz 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】: 【地区】: 【水费/次】:破天荒的中奖了,不陪跑了 【人照相似】:85 【目测年龄】:20 【颜值妆造】:89 【身材曲线】:苗条无赘肉,🐻C 【服务评分】:99 【情绪价值】:99 【详细描述】:性格开朗,谈吐舒服,有很认真的陪洗,漱口水毛巾都有,水中箫太冷没做太久,会帮忙擦干,服务很细致,上战场,开始表演,口得很舒服,我仔细的观察下面,没有异味,轻轻掰开,里面粉嫩,外面皮肤稍微暗沉,看了其他表哥的报告,果断女上起步,技术杠杠的,感觉我才是鸭子,疯狂嘟嘟,改背后女上,更猛烈了,可以看到嫩肉都被带出来,翻身农奴把歌唱,传教士开嘟,妹子叫声动作都很配合,还很会夹,双腿夹紧这招估计没几个表哥能抗住,差点被夹出,总的换了3,4种姿势,感觉不能太折腾妹子,集中感觉,顺利出货,问了妹子说已经有表哥在等了,抓紧洗澡,妹子还会帮忙洗干净,服务真没话说。完全没有因为是中…

3 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC531 views1 reactionsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:9.3 【验证人】:肆(全戒版) 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】:@lixia0801 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:5 【人照相似】:8 【目测年龄】:21 【颜值妆造】:淡妆涂口红 【身材曲线】:8 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】:贵州妹子身高应该有165胸和屁股手感都还不错 尤其是屁股撞起来可以DuangDuang的 陪洗之后上床 大蟒🐍 服务很细致 bb也没有异味不停把玩 戴套开搓 换几个姿势不停的🐍最后女上出货 【总结】:强烈推荐女上 水多会夹 不冷场会聊天 情绪价值高 脚指头涂了猫眼色很诱惑 床上很反差😏 【总体评分】:9 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

❤1

3 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC670 viewsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:0903 【验证人】:影子 【老师艺名】:立夏 【地区】:湖里万达 【水费/次】:5p 【人照相似】:9.5 【目测年龄】:21/2 【颜值妆造】:淡妆很好 【身材曲线】:SSS 【服务评分】:SSS 【情绪价值】:SSSSS相当哇塞 【详细描述】: 穿衣品味不错,看多了睡衣,开门一眼很不错,连刷两天的衣着都相当打眼。 身材不错,该瘦瘦该大大。再次感觉确实是匈奴人,亮眼的大灯真晃眼。搭配上甜笑,醉驾了。 情绪价值拉满,过程互动频繁,有恋爱的感觉。 【总结】:春天来了,又到了交配的季节,发现“配偶” 【总体评分】:9.9(这波留夏要吃到撑) 【推荐指数】:★★★★★★★★

2 Sept 2026, 16:33 UTC700 viewsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:2026.9.3 【验证人】:被骗钱的小丑 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】:@lixia0801 【地区】:厦门湖里 【水费/次】:500p 【人照相似】:9 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:8 【身材曲线】:7 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:很活泼的小姐姐,全程会一直跟你互动,虽然作爱的过程中叫床比较单调,但是下面会一直夹,也会照顾你的情绪,第一次在厦门出击的体验感很棒,拉满 【总结】:5张活菩萨 【总体评分】:9 【推荐指数】:★★★★

2 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC673 views1 reactionsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:2026.9.2 【验证人】:sbjmx 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】:@lixia0801 【地区】:厦门湖里 【水费/次】:5p 【人照相似】:90 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:95 【身材曲线】:95 【服务评分】:100 【情绪价值】:100 【详细描述】: 一进门老师就相当热情迎接上来,立夏老师的发色是我喜欢的,妆容也非常到位了,交完水费老师脱光之后就硬了,完美的身材,细枝硕果。老师事前事后都有陪洗,还会帮忙擦干,也是服务相当到位了。上床后先是🐍了一会儿,然后开始口,接着69,老师服务非常到位,提的要求都会满足,特别要称赞的是老师的口技,口的特别舒服,还会问感觉如何是不是不舒服。进入正题后,老师那句“不单单你想操我,我也想要了”真是相当魅惑,做的时候互相吸对方耳朵,老师会的姿势很多,老师现场教学了好几种新姿势,获益匪浅了。再就是老师的夹功了得,各种姿势都能夹,最后也是在老师的夹功配合浪叫中出了货…

❤1

2 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC688 viewsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:2026.7.8 【验证人】:to1 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】:@lixia0801 【地区】:厦门湖里 【水费/次】:600p 【人照相似】:9 【目测年龄】:22 【颜值妆造】:10 【身材曲线】:9 【服务评分】:10 【情绪价值】:10 【详细描述】:熟悉位置,地方好找课室很好找,黄毛好看,服务好评,超级配合。 【总结】:顶级必冲 【总体评分】:9.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

2 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC789 viewsread 4 September 2026

【出击日期】:202609 【验证人】:Uyt阿星(划水版) 【老师艺名】:立夏 【老师账号】:@lixia0801 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:500p 【人照相似】:75 【目测年龄】:21 【颜值妆造】:85 【身材曲线】:90 【服务评分】:95 【情绪价值】:98 【详细描述】: 进门主动拿拖鞋,坐着抽烟立夏还会特地贴过来,整体感觉有点小小御姐风格,看着立夏一件一件退去衣服,非常养眼,鸡儿硬棒棒,入浴后非常主动正反面清洁加上水中萧,这时候已经迫不及待要把立夏推倒了。 立夏整体颜值中上,初看没有很惊艳,但是细看属于大气端庄的类型,非常耐看,化妆还不错,不会有精神小妹感,显得精致,身材好,皮肤细滑,小只不胖但是有料。 do感非常棒,很真实,特别主动,放得开,战斗开始立夏主动大蟒蛇,抱着脑袋狂舌,口活不错,69也来一遍,最后我让立夏躺着,先给立夏润一润,紧致无异味,过程中反应真实,水也多,跨部一阵一阵抽抽,进入正戏,传教士…

2 Sept 2026, 05:28 UTC789 viewsread 4 September 2026

宝宝们,因上次大姨妈提前,答应好的宝宝们继续活动的,依旧做活动5张,不过需要宝宝们辛苦写写报告哦。@lixia0801

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tianpinwu2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“夏日饮品店” (@tianpinwu2026), 1,140 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tianpinwu2026.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.