【出击日期】:8.12 【验证人】:一十 【老师艺名】:小甜点 【老师账号】:@xiaotiandian812 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:7p 【人照相似】:10(完全没差别) 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:10 【身材曲线】:9.5 【服务评分】:8.5 【情绪价值】:9 【详细描述】:新妹子一到立马预约,看到描述10成相似度感觉有点夸张,没想到见到人比照片还好看,非常离谱,以至于花臂一点不影响,常规交水费,闲聊,开始亲嘴😂果然还是嫩妹亲的好亲的爽,一起洗个澡,出来开始给我口了一下,正常感觉,面对嫩妹我不要服务,我来就行,胸部刚刚好在她身上一点都不多,一点不少,狂狂一顿舔,舔完接着舌,一个字爽,带套进入,真的年轻肉体极致体验,一个字紧,也是被一个姿势秒杀,没办法太优秀了,妹子结束后也是不慌不忙,该聊天聊天,还给水喝,态度很好 【总结】:除了花臂,身材颜值拉满了,顶级 【总体评分】:9.9 【推荐指数】:★★★★★

Channel
甜点屋
@tiandianwu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
864subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004430716215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiandianwu |
| Created | 2 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiandianwu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 864 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 854 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.3%
- avg views ÷ 864 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 253
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (2 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,266 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【出击日期】:8.12 【验证人】:毛毛 【老师艺名】:小甜品 【老师账号】: 【地区】:湖里 【水费/次】:700 【人照相似】:10 和照片基本一样 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:9 【身材曲线】:10 身材确实好,S型前突后翘 【服务评分】:9 【情绪价值】:9 比较害羞 【详细描述】:听说羊村昨晚来了新嫩妹,马上预约,遥控上门,看见妹妹穿着黄色可爱睡衣,确实是嫩妹一枚,桌上还放着两箱矿泉水,果然服务到位,小妹确实没啥经验,脱衣服都很害羞,不好意思给你看,有帮忙陪洗,挺耐心的,慢慢洗,身材很棒,介绍说b,我感觉有B+,坚挺有型,奶头一小点凹进去,需要吸出来,然后就是大战时刻,可以轻🐍,下面毛量茂密,挺紧的,反馈不错,事后躺一起聊了会天,很不错的体验 【总结】:喜欢嫩妹的抓紧冲,后面表哥轻点,别给吓跑了,哈哈 【总体评分】:9.5 【推荐指数】:★★★★★
已就位啦。@xiaotiandian812
明天中午两点见😘 @xiaotiandian812
双向 @xiaotiandian123bot @xiaotiandian812
Channel name was changed to «甜点屋»
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tiandianwu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,033,618 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“甜点屋” (@tiandianwu), 864 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiandianwu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.