8 measurements spanning 15 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,610–1,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 22:26
1,620
+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:18
1,617
+3
16 Aug 2026, 16:25
1,614
+3
13 Aug 2026, 03:44
1,611
-5
10 Aug 2026, 11:04
1,616
+2
7 Aug 2026, 18:51
1,614
+3
7 Aug 2026, 16:48
1,611
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:22
1,611
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 7 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
101.9%
avg views ÷ 1,620 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
16 (7 December 2023 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
1,650
Reactions total
155
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 57s
Average length
2m 44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35,496 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,882
30.7%
🔥
6,156
17.3%
🥰
3,877
10.9%
👍
3,354
9.45%
💯
2,721
7.67%
🎉
2,544
7.17%
❤🔥
1,390
3.92%
😍
1,325
3.73%
🤡
1,266
3.57%
👏
694
1.96%
😁
677
1.91%
😱
174
0.49%
🕊
87
0.245%
👌
85
0.239%
⚡
55
0.155%
🐳
55
0.155%
🍾
48
0.135%
🏆
46
0.13%
🦄
29
0.082%
🤩
15
0.042%
5 further kinds
16
0.045%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,496reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2023 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,011
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
464
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thundersend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 December 2023 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡ Thunder Flash now supports Onekey wallet transactions
-Now you can use our Flash tokens in the Onekey wallet
-Also, the tokens you send to the Onekey wallet through our bot can be Swap to any other token using that wallet.
-This also works for all versions of the onekey wallet.
-Also, You Can Track Transaction On explorer
Unfortunately, I don't plan to offer smaller plans.
This Option Now Valid Only Monthly An…
⚡ The best new update of the year
-Now you can use our Flash tokens in the trezor wallet
-The most unique thing is that tokens sent to your Trezor wallet using our bot can be transferred to other wallets through your Trezor wallet.
-You can also transfer tokens back to the Trezor wallet from those other wallets and there is no specific number of times for that.
Unfortunately, I don't plan to offer smaller plans.
…
⚡ Bot updated
- The replica Etherscan is up and running again.
- Also, fixed some bugs related to transaction display on the latest version of Trust, ByBit And More Wallet.
Contact - @Thunderflashdeve
Bot Link - @thunderflashdev_bot
⚡ the bot is finally ready! Unfortunately, I don't plan to offer smaller plans.
This Option Now Valid Only Monthly And Lifetime User
- All Active Monthly And Lifetime User Can Access This Function
Bot Link - @thunderflashdev_bot
Contact - @Thunderflashdeve
⚡️ The flasher has been successfully updated.
— A quick fix regarding transaction sending; everything should be working now.
- A major update has been delayed until tomorrow. I apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Whoever wants their plan prolonged due to the maintenance, message @Thunderflashdeve with your user ID
⚡️ The flasher has been successfully updated.
— Fixed a problem when plans weren't added automatically after the invoice is paid;
- By the way, something big is going to happen during this month. So don't forget to join this channel to keep yourself up to date with everything.
Contact - @Thunderflashdeve
Bot Link - @thunderflashdev_bot
⚡️ A new version of the bot has been released.
All the same features are still available, but with full bug fixes, as well as the function of displaying a transaction as received is now also available and works without any issues. To use it, just revert the transaction with the /revert command at any time.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact @Thunderflashdeve
⚡️ The flasher has been successfully updated.
- Trust Wallet And Metamask Wallet And Other Wallet Flashing Now Can Do.
To anyone who I hasn't added additional time to their plan, please message @Thunderflashdeve with proof of purchase.
⚡️ The flasher has been successfully updated.
- Absolutely all problems have been fixed
To anyone who I hasn't added additional time to their plan, please message @Thunderflashdeve with proof of purchase.
⚡️ The flasher has been successfully updated. Wallet now shows a sent transaction as received once you revert it.
Contact - @Thunderflashdeve
Bot Link - @thunderflashdev_bot
⚡️ A new feature that allows you to make the transaction received is also still available. After sending a transaction you need to revert it in 5-10 seconds and it'll show up as received in 7 minutes.
You can also send it to make a fake screenshot, but the money will come back to your wallet instantly.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @thundersend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 417,718 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Thunder” (@thundersend), 1,620 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thundersend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.