Max reaction drop everyone ππ
β€1

Channel
@thegamblersstation
On this record: Previous handles Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
11,266subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001855541322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thegamblersstation |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thegamblersstation |
@thegamblersstation was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today β only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 11,266 | +52 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:45 | 11,214 | +78 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 11,136 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 11,136 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 11,140 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 11,145 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 11,146 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 11,158 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 11,155 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 11,175 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 11,172 | +31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 11,141 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 11,136 | -21 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 11,157 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 11,169 | -20 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 11,189 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 11,204 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 11,213 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 11,218 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 11,218 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (27 July 2026 β 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44,475 |
| Reactions total | 890 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
964 reactions across 67 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 577 | 59.9% | |
| π₯ | 131 | 13.6% | |
| customΒ 5267500801240092311 | 62 | 6.43% | |
| π | 32 | 3.32% | |
| π | 30 | 3.11% | |
| π | 28 | 2.90% | |
| π | 23 | 2.39% | |
| π | 12 | 1.24% | |
| π | 12 | 1.24% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 11 | 1.14% | |
| π | 9 | 0.934% | |
| π | 7 | 0.726% | |
| π | 7 | 0.726% | |
| π | 4 | 0.415% | |
| π± | 4 | 0.415% | |
| π€ | 4 | 0.415% | |
| πΎ | 3 | 0.311% | |
| π― | 3 | 0.311% | |
| π | 2 | 0.207% | |
| π | 2 | 0.207% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.104% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 964 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Max reaction drop everyone ππ
β€1
π Today night pre-bet ππ β 68CP6 ππ
β€8π2π₯1π1customΒ 52675008012400923111
π΅π΅ 12ODD BOOM βοΈβοΈβοΈ
β€10customΒ 52675008012400923113π₯2π1πΏ1
K5XN6
β€9π₯1customΒ 52675008012400923111
βοΈβοΈβοΈ"Winners make the effort while losers make excuses." ππ ""THE GAMBLERS STATION""π¬π¬
π₯20β€9π4customΒ 52675008012400923113π1
ββ8YJZN 12oddβοΈβοΈ
β€15π4π€3π2customΒ 52675008012400923112
β β Bang done ππ
π6π₯4customΒ 52675008012400923113π2
πSS2XN
β€7π5customΒ 52675008012400923113π€1
1.7 odd le π€―
β DYUTN 37 odd dropped ππ
β€8β€βπ₯3π3customΒ 52675008012400923112π1π1
β β 2X BOOM π€π€
customΒ 52675008012400923118β€3π₯2π1
UKLPN π₯π₯
β€7π1customΒ 52675008012400923111
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @thegamblersstation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTHE GAMBLERS STATIONπ³π΅β (@thegamblersstation), 11,266 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thegamblersstation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.