• بهترین سیگنالها • بهترین تجربه در معاملات • فارکس بهترین خدمات مدیریت حساب به این کانال بپیوندید https://t.me/GOLDTRADERJACK7 @TRADERS_JACK

Channel
The Wow Trader
@the_wow_trader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,132subscribers
-333 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001405340552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @the_wow_trader |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/the_wow_trader |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 9,132 | -105 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:28 | 9,237 | -46 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 9,283 | -76 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 9,359 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 9,388 | -19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 9,407 | -23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 9,430 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 9,423 | -23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 9,446 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 9,467 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 9,465 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 9,465 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.41%
- avg views ÷ 9,132 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 586
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (13 July 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,929 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 06m
- Average length
- 4m 44s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
⬆️ من این پیوند را 30 دقیقه دیگر حذف خواهم کرد‼️ سریع بپیوندید✅
من به ۹۹ نفر دسترسی رایگان به کانال خصوصیام میدهم. دیگر این لینک را رایگان به اشتراک نمیگذارم. این لینک تا ۲۵ دقیقه دیگر منقضی میشود. سریع عضو شوید 👇👇 https://t.me/+KEU91fRGR2JhOTQy https://t.me/+KEU91fRGR2JhOTQy
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔵 استراتژی معاملاتی SP2L بر اساس کانسپت اسمارت مانی 🔴 حتما قبل استفاده خوب ازش بکتست بگیرید. امیدوارم براتون مفید باشه. از دوست عزیزم منوچهر جان بابت تهیه این ویدیو تشکر میکنم.🙏 📱 The_Wow_Trader
رفقا یه نکته مهم در مورد مدیریت سرمایه بهتون بگم یه اشتباهی که خیلی از تریدرها میکنن اینه که فکر میکنن مدیریت سرمایه یعنی همیشه با یه درصد ثابت ریسک کنن. ولی واقعیت اینه که ریسک باید پویا باشه. ✅ مثلاً وقتی بازار دقیقاً همون شرایطیه که استراتژیت توش بهترین عملکرد رو داره، میتونی یه مقدار ریسک رو بیشتر کنی. ✅ برعکس، وقتی چند تا ضرر پشت سر هم داشتی یا بازار اون وضوح همیشگی رو نداره، بهتره ریسکت رو کمتر کنی. این…
دوستانی که قصد افتتاح حساب یا ثبتنام در بروکر لایت فایننس رو داشتن، فرآیند ثبتنام و احراز هویت براتون چطور بود؟
- کاملاً راحت و بدون مشکل20%
- چند تا مشکل داشتم ولی حل شد6%
- هنوز موفق به ثبتنام نشدم9%
- دیدن نتایج66%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آموزش اتصال متاتریدر 5 ویندوز در بروکر لایت فایننس 🔗 لینک ثبتنام در بروکر: https://litefinance.org/?uid=285185817&cid=345408
آموزش برداشت از طریق تاپ چنج 🔗 لینک ثبتنام در بروکر: https://litefinance.org/?uid=285185817&cid=345408
آموزش واریز از طریق تاپ چنج 🔗 لینک ثبتنام در بروکر: https://litefinance.org/?uid=285185817&cid=345408
آموزش اتصال به متاتریدر در بروکر لایت فایننس 🔗 لینک ثبتنام در بروکر: https://litefinance.org/?uid=285185817&cid=345408
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @the_wow_trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوستانی که قصد افتتاح حساب یا ثبتنام در بروکر لایت فایننس رو داشتن، فرآیند ثبتنام و احراز هویت براتون چطور بود؟
- کاملاً راحت و بدون مشکل20%
- چند تا مشکل داشتم ولی حل شد6%
- هنوز موفق به ثبتنام نشدم9%
- دیدن نتایج66%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@the_wow_trader named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TradingWithAtrin · 108,646
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@piknikanalyst_educations · 66,725
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@FOREXSTREET1 · 49,002
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
@G_N_E_S_R_0 · 126,453
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@pur_samadi · 28,604
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
@heisedris · 57,417
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
@battle_trading · 71,451
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@AMOOZESH_TRADERS · 43,218
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
@redmahale · 47,360
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@taranom_khiyal · 65,211
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
@nima_shamsian · 43,095
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Wow Trader” (@the_wow_trader), 9,132 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_wow_trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.