Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Outlook

Channel

Crypto Outlook

@the_crypto_0utlook

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23,172subscribers

-361 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055144087
TypeChannel
Username@the_crypto_0utlook
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/the_crypto_0utlook

Growth

23,17223,53323,352.57 August 2026 — 23,533 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,533 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,493 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,432 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,379 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,341 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,317 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,275 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,218 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,172 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -361. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,118–23,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:3523,172-46
16 Aug 2026, 07:5323,218-57
14 Aug 2026, 17:3823,275-42
13 Aug 2026, 05:5523,317-24
12 Aug 2026, 05:1723,341-38
11 Aug 2026, 08:4323,379-53
10 Aug 2026, 05:4023,432-36
9 Aug 2026, 06:4323,468-25
8 Aug 2026, 09:5723,493-40
7 Aug 2026, 14:3023,533no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2123,533first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.149%
avg views ÷ 23,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.5
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held44 (3 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total1,519
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
150.0%
👌150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC16 viewsread 17 August 2026

Binance blocks transactions with HTX and 15 other sanctioned exchanges The crypto exchange introduced restrictions in three stages: on August 7, 2 platforms; on August 13, another 3. However, the main block will take effect on August 23. This list includes HTX and 10 other smaller exchanges. Almost all of the blocked companies, with the exception of Shelbit and Aban, are included in the updated EU sanctions list. T

14 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC36 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Japan launches a pilot project for repo transactions in government bonds on blockchain Mitsubishi and its subsidiary banking companies, as well as a joint venture with Morgan Stanley, will take part in the development. To implement the project, they will work with blockchain companies Digital Asset Holdings (U.S.) and Progmat (Japan). Transactions in Japanese government bonds will take place on the Canton Network bl

14 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC30 viewsread 17 August 2026

KPMG of the Big Four conducted Tether’s first full audit The company issued an unqualified opinion, also known as a “clean” opinion, on its 2025 reserves. At the same time, KPMG declined to disclose detailed information, citing confidentiality. By the end of 2025, the company’s assets exceeded its liabilities by $6.8 billion. The audit covered the “full financial statements,” including the complete balance sheet, i

14 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC32 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

The CFTC will join the SEC in studying cryptocurrency regulation without the CLARITY bill On August 20, the agency will hold a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Innovation to discuss the regulation of crypto assets, AI, and prediction markets. Among the topics for discussion are rules outside the laws approved by Congress. Similar notices were previously published by the SEC. The commission intends to discuss ne

13 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC33 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Slovenia has registered the first company in the register of electronic money token issuers under MiCA The first authorized issuer indicates that the country’s central bank is ready to process MiCA applications. This could lower the barrier to obtaining a similar license for other market participants. Dinaro operates as an electronic money institution under the supervision of the Bank of Slovenia. The company provi

13 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC34 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Hawaii bans the use of crypto ATMs starting October 1 It has become the fourth U.S. state, after Minnesota, Tennessee, and Indiana, to fully ban such devices over fraud concerns. According to CoinATMRadar, 57 crypto ATMs were operating in Hawaii. In 2025, the state received 826 cryptocurrency-related complaints, resulting in losses of $80 million. Nationwide, losses exceeded $11 billion. At the same time, other sta

13 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC38 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

The failed launch of the BTC soft fork, BIP-110, shows that Bitcoin is “virtually impossible to reproduce” The project was promoted by longtime BTC developer Luke Dashjr, who was removed from his position after the failure. BIP-110 was supposed to change BTC consensus rules to address the problem of spam on the network. On August 8–9, nodes running BIP-110 split from the main Bitcoin network and created a separate b

12 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC37 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

British lawmakers are putting pressure on banks ahead of the new crypto regulatory regime, due in October 2027. They have asked banks to clarify their approach to working with the industry, including account opening and other services. In addition, they need to specify which regulatory, legal, commercial, and risk considerations influence these decisions. They must also indicate whether all limits relating to crypto

12 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC32 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

The CFTC accused a Florida resident of organizing a $397 million pyramid scheme Christopher Delgado and his company, Goliath Ventures Inc., raised funds from 1,600 clients. However, they used the money to attract new users and for their own enrichment. In particular, Delgado embezzled $48 million, which he used to buy a yacht, services, and other luxury items. At the same time, the fraudster claimed that the funds w

12 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC33 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

CFTC uses its emergency powers to allow Kalshi to continue operating amid a New York lawsuit The regulator said the prediction-markets company must continue operating under federal jurisdiction. This came after a lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James. She demanded that Kalshi stop operating in the state and pay more than $36 billion in penalties. In addition, FlightAware has sued the company over

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @the_crypto_0utlook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 470,993 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Outlook” (@the_crypto_0utlook), 23,172 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_crypto_0utlook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.