Channel
@tgzh_vip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,427subscribers
-208 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001333135839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tgzh_vip |
| Created | 5 March 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tgzh_vip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 12,427 | -31 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 12,458 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 12,480 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 12,502 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 12,528 | -29 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 12,557 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 12,580 | -36 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 12,616 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12,635 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 5 March 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
511 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 268 | 52.4% | |
| 👍 | 185 | 36.2% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 6.07% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 2.94% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.783% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.587% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.587% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.391% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2021 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
🔺 重要提醒 ▪️ 最近很多用户收到类似上图 👆🏼这种冒充官方发的消息，经核实这种是盗号的 看到类似这种请勿点击 直接拉黑即可！！还有很多被盗号的，一般都是给陌生人截图了， 如果遇到陌生人骗你截图的，千万不要随便给陌生人截图！！有可能会导致账号被盗！！紧急提防！！ 👨💻 联系客服 📲 下载Telegram 🔹 点击这里安装简体中文
❤114👍62👏19👎8🥰3😍3
Telegram 中文频道 ✈️ pinned Deleted message
Telegram 的 DC5 再次离线。 24-4-27 用户目前报告连接到 DC5 或与位于 DC5 的用户和对话交互时出现问题。 该数据中心位于新加坡，为亚洲、大洋洲和澳大利亚的用户提供服务。 北京时间 16:36 更新：经过一个半小时的中断后，服务似乎正在重归稳定。 📲 下载最新版本 💀 如果出现误报毒或者无法下载等问题请联系下方客服解决！！ 👨🏼💼 在线客服 🔹 点击这里安装简体中文
❤74👍49😱4👌2
🔴 重要通知 🔺最近频繁发生盗U事件，在此提醒大家注意谨慎转U！谨慎核对地址！！
❤14👍4
Telegram 中文频道 ✈️ pinned a photo
🔻 强烈建议开启 Telegram 两步验证! 🔺 为了你 Telegram 账户的安全和隐私, 强烈建议开启 Telegram 两步验证! ▪️ Telegram 注册和登录时,输入手机号码会发送验证码到手机号或已登录过的设备上,输入验证码就能进入账户了. ▪️ 如果中途出现什么情况,别人拿到了登录的验证码就能进入你的 Telegram 了,他能做的就和你能做的一样了. ▫️ 两步验证,( Two-stop verification) ,也被称为双因素身份验证,可以为帐户增加一道安全防线. ▫️ 开启两步验证后,登录时在输入完验证码后,还会要求输入一个密码.这样,即使别人在中途拿到了登录的验证码,没有你设置的密码也进入不了你的账户. 👉 操作: Telegram→设置→隐私和安全→两步验证→开启 🤜 隐私设置 🔸 输入密码, 密码提示, 恢复邮箱这三者必须牢记,并且邮箱是能正常使用的,如果更换了邮箱,记得及时更新 T…
👍70❤66👏12👎7
Signed Teleph
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tgzh_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 350,872 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram 中文频道 ✈️” (@tgzh_vip), 12,427 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgzh_vip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.