Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TennisTour

Channel

TennisTour

@tennistour_spb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,743subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164983812
TypeChannel
Username@tennistour_spb
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tennistour_spb

Growth

1,7311,7431,7377 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,733 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,739 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,741 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,743 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,729–1,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:271,743+2
14 Aug 2026, 16:131,741+2
11 Aug 2026, 02:211,739+6
7 Aug 2026, 22:521,733+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,731first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 1,743 subscribers
Avg views / post
417
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.486%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,585
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
533.3%
👍533.3%
🔥533.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC282 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ℹ️ изначально мы планировали турниры, стартующие 7-8 августа, провести в два дня. Но затем получили от участников обращения с просьбой сыграть за один день поэтому мы приняли следующее решение: в соответствии с расписанием будут сыгран полностью групповой этап и первый круг (как и планировалось изначально). Затем, только если все четверо полуфиналистов будут согласны, заключительные матчи (полуфинал, финал и игра за

👍5

6 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC421 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Рейтинг* открытого Первенства клуба "Хасанский" по состоянию на 06.08.2026 Мужской одиночный разряд https://t.me/tennistour_spb/5488 *учитываются последние 8 турниров

6 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC422 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ осталось последнее место на завтра в мужском одиночном разряде Masters обращаем ваше внимание на классный набор призов 👇 🎁 призеры турнира получат: 🥇 место - нутрицевтики нового поколения от компании Dietelle + сертификаты на гигиеническую чистку зубов от группы стоматологических клиник Жемчужина Севера 🥈 место - сертификат на 2000руб. от группы стоматологических клиник Жемчужина Севера 🥉 место - сертификат на

6 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC399 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 ВОСКРЕСЕНЬЕ, 9 АВГУСТА СМЕШАННЫЙ ПАРНЫЙ РАЗРЯД. MASTERS В 16:00 🗂 8/12 пар Васильев Ярослав / Герасименко Елизавета Дедов Александр / Васильева Василина Иванов Дмитрий / Шатрова Мария Ковальчук Григорий / Буланова Валерия Плеханов Михаил / свой партнер Подклетнов Даниил / Мизина Анна Шехин Сергей / Лахути Наталья Ширипов Даниил / Мочаева Анастасия думают / ищут пару: Буханов Константин Семилетников Олег ЖЕНС

1

6 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC406 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 СУББОТА, 8 АВГУСТА МУЖСКОЙ ОДИНОЧНЫЙ РАЗРЯД. CHALLENGER В 09:45 🗂 12/12 игроков Галумян Давид Дмитренко Богдан Дмитриев Савва Иванов Михаил Ионов Артем Кабаков Николай Котовский Дмитрий Лукьянцев Павел Моисеев Альберт Пика Михаил Сафронов Андрей Ширипов Даниил лист ожидания: ЖЕНСКИЙ ОДИНОЧНЫЙ РАЗРЯД. В 12:30 🗂 8/12 игроков Ветчинкина Елена Власова Дарья Елисеева Ксения Иваненко Дарья Лозовская Валерия Свири

2

6 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC437 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 ПЯТНИЦА, 7 АВГУСТА МУЖСКОЙ ОДИНОЧНЫЙ РАЗРЯД. MASTERS В 18:15 🗂 12/12 игроков Алексеев Сергей Григорьев Анатолий Гулаков Константин Дедов Александр Дмитренко Артём Еремин Александр Кострубин Станислав Мигунов Егор Мухортов Илья Петров Максим Слинкин Вячеслав Шайтан Василий 🎁 призеры турнира получат: 🥇 место - нутрицевтики нового поколения от компании Dietelle + сертификаты на гигиеническую чистку зубов от груп

1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC540 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Приглашаем на воскресные турниры TennisTour на этой неделе! ☀️ при хорошей погоде турнир пройдет на открытых кортах 🔔 первые 6 игроков (пар) в каждой сетке, записавшиеся и оплатившие взнос до вечера понедельника (03.08), получат скидку 500руб. в одиночном разряде и 600 в парном (на пару) ТВД от TennisTour это: 🟢 6️⃣ категорий в одиночном и 5️⃣ в парном разрядах 🟢 минимум 3️⃣ полноценных односетовых матча 🟢 накопит

1

2 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC573 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 ТВД 02.08.2026 ➡️ мужской одиночный разряд 4️⃣-й категории 🗂 10 игроков 🥈 место - Тресков Сергей 🥇 место - Кабальеро Энрике Филипп 🥉 место - Лейзин Александр ⭐️ победитель утешительной сетки - Феоктистова Ольга 🔥 благодарим спонсора турнира - central barbershop за предоставленные призерам сертификаты

2 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC499 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 ТВД 02.08.2026 ➡️ мужской одиночный разряд 5️⃣-й категории 🗂 10 игроков 🥉 место - Мошонкин Илья 🥇 место - Стоянов Дмитрий 🥈 место - Турецкий Дмитрий ⭐️ победитель утешительной сетки - Ивина Екатерина 🔥 благодарим спонсора турнира - central barbershop за предоставленные призерам сертификаты

2 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC448 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗓 ТВД 02.08.2026 ➡️ мужской одиночный разряд 3️⃣-й категории 🗂 10 игроков 🥈 место - Жданов Павел 🥇 место - Жданов Михаил 🥉 место - Плеханов Кирилл ⭐️ победитель утешительной сетки - Кирильцев Роман 🔥 благодарим спонсора турнира - central barbershop за предоставленные призерам сертификаты

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tennistour_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 645,361 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TennisTour” (@tennistour_spb), 1,743 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tennistour_spb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.