8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,790–1,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 20:24
1,793
+2
23 Aug 2026, 06:56
1,791
-1
19 Aug 2026, 10:06
1,792
+1
12 Aug 2026, 16:24
1,791
-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:51
1,793
-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:40
1,798
+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:51
1,797
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:19
1,797
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.63%
avg views ÷ 1,793 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
40 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,636
Reactions total
64
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 34s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11
47.8%
👎
3
13.0%
😡
3
13.0%
😱
3
13.0%
😐
2
8.70%
👏
1
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#اخبار_طرق
بهمنظور حضور هرچه باشکوهتر در مراسم هفتم مرحوم حاج حسن حیدرعلی، برای رفاه شهروندان وسیله ایابوذهاب تدارک دیده شده است.
🚌 زمان حرکت: شنبه ۱۷ مرداد، ساعت ۸:۳۰ صبح
📍 محل حرکت : مقابل مدرسه حیدرعلی واقع در انتهای خیابان شهید لوحی
از تمامی اهالی محترم دعوت میشود با حضور در این مراسم، مراتب قدردانی و احترام خود را نسبت به خدمات فرهنگی، اجتماعی و خیرخواهانه آن مرحوم ابراز کنند.
همچنین عزیزانی که تمایل…
#اخبار_طرق
#صندوق_قرض_الحسنه_شهید_واحدی
به اطلاع آن دسته از عزیزانی که از مورخ ۲۳ خردادماه به بانک های صادرات و ملی واریزی داشته اند و متاسفانه هنوز به حساب صندوق شان واریز نشده میرساند فیش های واریزی خود را به حسابداری صندوق تحویل نمایند .
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
📩 پیام ارسالی مخاطب
سلام. بر اثر طوفان و وزش شدید باد در چند روز گذشته، یک کتیبه بزرگ مشکی با طرح «چهار سلام» از دیوار منزل ما جدا شده و مفقود شده است.
ابعاد این کتیبه حدود ۷ متر در ۲ متر بوده و بسیار بزرگ (تقریباً به اندازه نمای یک ساختمان دوطبقه) است.
از شهروندان عزیز خواهشمندیم اگر این کتیبه را پیدا کردهاند یا از محل آن اطلاعی دارند، اطلاع دهند. برای یابنده مژدگانی در نظر گرفته شده است.
📍 محل نصب کتیبه انتهای…
🌱بلاگر آمریکایی: به من گفته بودند از جاهایی مثل عراق بترسم، خودم آمدم تا همه چیز را بفهمم/ میلیونها نفر در کربلا خواهان انتقام رهبر شهید هستند
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
بازداشت مردی که با لباس عزرائیل به بیماران بیمارستان خیره شده بود🫣
🔹مرد ۲۶ سالهای که در ولز با پوشیدن لباسی شبیه به عزرائیل و در دست داشتن یک تیغه بلند، به بیماران و مراجعه کنندگان به بیمارستان خیره می شد، دستگیر شد
🔹وی در دادگاه مدعی شد که لباسم شبیه به کلاغ بوده نه عزرائیل!😁
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
🔰سازه ی موکب ثارالله برپا شد
🔹️امروز سازه ی داربستی موکب ثارالله برپا شد و پس از تجهیز موکب، از روز شنبه پذیرای زائران حرم رضوی خواهد بود.
امسال موکب روستای ده غیبی در بیشترین فضا نسبت به سال های گذشته(بیش از دویست متر مربع)،خیل عظیم مشتاقان حرم قدسی رضوی را پذیرا خواهد بود.
#استوری_روز
#اخبار_منطقه
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
📽️نصب دوربین های امنیتی در سطح روستای ده غیبی🏘
🖇این دوربین ها شامل ۴ چشم(۲ پلاک خوان و ۲ نظارتی) است که در دو نقطه ی ورودی های روستا نصب شده است.
دیتابیس این دوربین ها در دفتر دهیاری قرار گرفته است.
#استوری_روز
#اخبار_منطقه
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
*بازدید بخشدار رضویه از روند برپایی مواکب در محور مشهد–سرخس*⛩️
🔹️ در راستای آمادگی هرچه بهتر برای استقبال از زائران حضرت علی بن موسیالرضا(ع)، بخشدار رضویه روز گذشته از روند برپایی و تجهیز مواکب در محور مشهد–سرخس بازدید کرد.
📎هر ساله با برپایی مواکب، خدمات متنوعی به زائران حضرت ثامنالحجج(ع) ارائه میشود.
#استوری_روز
#اخبار_منطقه
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
خواننده های لس آنجلسی در حال زمینه سازی برای برگشت به ایران؟
شادمهر عقیلی بعداز سالها، دوباره «گل یاس» را خواند؛ قطعهای که سال ۱۳۷۷ منتشر شد.
ترانه این اثر در وصف حضرت فاطمه سلام الله علیها سروده شده
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
@tarigh_net | #رسانه_طریق
😡1
Signed Daryadel
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @tarigh_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 554,223 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tarigh | طریق” (@tarigh_net), 1,793 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarigh_net.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.