Channel
@talk_itout
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,333subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002065824521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talk_itout |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talk_itout |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 1,333 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 1,334 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 1,336 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 1,337 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,339 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 1,342 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 1,343 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 1,342 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 1,342 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 37.3% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 26.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 14.9% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 9.70% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 2.24% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.24% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.746% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2024 to 3 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Let’s engage in grammar exercises by answering the questions below 👇😉 Looking forward to reading your responses 😍💚 1.What could you have eaten for breakfast today if you had more time? 2.What could have made your day better yesterday? 3.Describe a time when you missed an opportunity. What could you have done differently? 4.Share a moment when you failed at something. What could have been done to achieve success…
❤8😍2❤🔥1👍1👏1
🔔A wolf in sheep’s clothing 🍀Someone that seems to be good but is actually not good at all. ✨E.g: Be careful of that salesman; he may seem friendly, but he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. ✨E.g: I thought she was a kind person, but she turned out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing. ✨E.g: Don't trust him; he's just a wolf in sheep's clothing, pretending to be your friend. #idioms @talk_itout 💚
👍5❤🔥2👌1😍1😨1
🌞Morning guys 🌞 Let’s keep our idiom train rolling 😎
😍5🆒3
🔔 Could have done 🍀Means that something was possible in the past, or you had the ability to do something in the past, but that you didn't do it. ✨ E.g: We could have finished the project earlier with better time management. ✨ E.g: You could have asked for help instead of struggling alone. ✨ E.g: They could have won the game if they had practiced more. ✨ E.g: I could have saved money by comparing prices before bu…
👍4❤🔥2❤1💯1😍1
Guys, Do you recall the structure we discussed earlier ? 👆🤔👆 🔔Should have done 🔔Should have been done To jog your memory 👇🙂👇: ✨You should have done your homework before watching the TV. ✨ They dishes should have been done before you went out. Now share your own examples, so we can shift our focus to new but related structure.✍️
👍5❤1❤🔥1🤔1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Now, think about a time when you had to back out of an invitation. What was the excuse you gave? Share your experiences in the comments below! 😍😍😍 دوستان حالا که ویدیو رو دیدین و کوئیز رو انجام دادین، نوبت شماست که از تجربیاتتون حتی اگه شده توی یک جمله بگین. یادتون نره که استفاده از اصطلاحات و ساختارهایی که یادمیگیرین حین صحبت در مورد تجربیات و نظرات خودتون خیلی میتونه تو مکالمه و یادگیر…
❤5👍2👨💻1
I appreciate the gesture? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3❤🔥1👍1
Let me make it up to you? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4❤🔥1👍1
Don’t sweat it ? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4❤🔥1👍1
At the eleventh hour? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3❤1❤🔥1
ببینم با کوئیز پایین چه میکنین😉 #vocabulary #idioms @talk_itout💚
👍3❤🔥1👌1😍1
☁️☀️☁️ Rainy mornings are the perfect time to cozy up, learn something new, and expand our horizons. Are you ready for some fresh idioms and expressions to brighten up your day?😍 @talk_itout 💚
❤4👍2😍2❤🔥1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @talk_itout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
I appreciate the gesture? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Let me make it up to you? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Don’t sweat it ? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
At the eleventh hour? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3.What are they going to about Sam? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2.What has Sam been doing for the last several days? 🤔
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2024 to 3 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Talk It Out” (@talk_itout), 1,333 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talk_itout.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.