Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مرکز تجربه زندگی

Channel

مرکز تجربه زندگی

@tajrobeh_life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

9,876subscribers

+266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001311204502
TypeChannel
Username@tajrobeh_life
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tajrobeh_life

Growth

9,6069,8789,7426 August 2026 — 9,610 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,610 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,615 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,606 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,611 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,876 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,870 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,867 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,878 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,875 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,876 subscribers9,8766 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,565–9,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 08:499,876+1
29 Aug 2026, 15:369,875-3
26 Aug 2026, 11:029,878+11
23 Aug 2026, 19:589,867-3
20 Aug 2026, 05:579,870-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:129,876+265
13 Aug 2026, 23:199,611+5
10 Aug 2026, 17:239,606-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:109,615+5
6 Aug 2026, 18:009,610no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:529,610first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 9,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held42 (23 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total51,860
Reactions total660
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,003 reactions across 40 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53353.1%
👍15315.3%
💔11111.1%
🍓989.77%
😍191.89%
👌90.897%
🔥90.897%
😢90.897%
🕊80.798%
70.698%
👎70.698%
🖕70.698%
😭60.598%
🥰60.598%
🙏50.499%
👏40.399%
🤷‍♀30.299%
🤡20.199%
🦄20.199%
👻10.1%
4 further kinds40.399%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,003 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,220 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026

بعضی رابطه‌ها، با وجود تمام کششی که برایمان دارند، دیگر ظرفیت رشد، امنیت و آرامش را ندارند. ماندن در هر رابطه‌ای، همیشه نشانه‌ی عشق یا وفاداری بیشتر نیست. گاهی فقط رنجی را به تعویق می‌اندازیم که دیر یا زود ناچاریم با آن روبه‌رو شویم؛ رنجی که هرچه بیشتر به تعویق بیفتد، عمیق‌تر و فرساینده‌تر می‌شود. پایان دادن به یک رابطه‌ی ناسالم، معمولاً با غم، دلتنگی و احساس فقدان همراه است. این درد واقعی است و نباید انکار شود. ام

43👍11🍓3👏2

22 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,360 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل روانکاوانه فیلم The Invite https://www.instagram.com/p/DcT4PB6jTtU/?igsi=dnZpMG5kaDI4enVo

🍓6👎32

21 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,550 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

فیلم the Invite رو دیدید؟ (تحلیلش امشب منتشر می‌شه) anonymous poll نه، می‌بینم به زودی – 117 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 50% بله دیدم – 109 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 46% نخواهم دید – 9 👍 4% 👥 235 people voted so far.

6👍1👎1🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,770 views26 reactionsread 29 August 2026

«اگر روان‌درمانی واقعاً مؤثر است، چرا بعضی آدم‌ها با وجود درمان، همچنان دچار رنج شدید می‌شوند؟» هیچ درمانی تضمین صددرصدی برای حذف رنج یا جلوگیری از همه پیامدهای آن نیست. پژوهش‌ها نشان می‌دهند که روان‌درمانی به طور متوسط در کاهش افسردگی، اضطراب، افکار خودکشی و بهبود کیفیت زندگی اثربخش است؛ اما اثربخش بودن با «معجزه کردن» تفاوت دارد. نتیجه درمان به عوامل زیادی وابسته است؛ از جمله شدت اختلال، عوامل زیستی، حمایت اجتماع

👍204🍓2

17 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,940 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

خودسرزنشی؛ وقتی سوپرایگو به جای اصلاح، تنبیه می‌کند در فضای عمومی، خودسرزنشی اغلب با وجدان اخلاقی یا مسئولیت‌پذیری اشتباه گرفته می‌شود. اما از منظر روان‌کاوی، همه‌ی اشکال خودانتقادی، کارکرد یکسانی ندارند. فروید در The Ego and the Id (1923)، سوپرایگو را صرفاً مرجعی اخلاقی توصیف نمی‌کند؛ بلکه آن را ساختاری می‌داند که می‌تواند به‌شدت تنبیه‌گر، بی‌رحم و گاه مستقل از میزان خطای واقعی عمل کند. در چنین وضعیتی، شدت احساس گ

👍116🍓4

17 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,690 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

وقتی روبه‌روی دو آینه می‌ایستی، تصویرت بی‌نهایت بار تکرار می‌شود. پارت همین ایده را به موسیقی تبدیل کرد؛ چند نت ساده که مدام بازمی‌گردند و در انعکاس خود گم می‌شوند.

🍓121👍1

17 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,770 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026

بیگمان هرگز کسی چون من نکرد خویشتن را مایه آزار خویش از من است این غم که بر جان من است دیگر این خود کرده را تدبیر نیست فروغ فرخزاد

41👍4💔2🤡2

16 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,070 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

مدرسه تجربه زندگی برگزار می‌کند: دوره رویا در روانکاوی نگاهی به کارکرد ناخودآگاه، چگونگی ساخته شدن رویا و نمادها و مفاهیم نهفته در رویا ویژه درمانگران تحلیلی و کاندیدای روانکاوی مدرس: خانم دکتر زهرا قنبری؛ روانکاو شروع دوره از ۲۸ مرداد ماه مدت دوره: ۱۲-۱۴ جلسه روزهای چهارشنبه ساعت ۲۰ـ۲۱:۳۰ (یک هفته در میان) با ثبت نام تا پایان امشب از تخفیف ۳۰ درصدی دوره می‌توانید استفاده کنید. با شرکت در این دوره می‌توانید از س

15 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈2,390 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#پیشنهاد_فیلم 🎬 The Invite 2026 دعوت ⭐ IMDb: 7.9 | RT: 97 | Metacritic: 82 🎭 ژانر: درام، عاشقانه احساسی، کمدی 🔞 رده سنی: زیر 17 سال با والدین (R) 🌍 کشور: آمریکا 🗣 زبان: انگلیسی ، اسپانیایی ⏱ مدت زمان: 107 دقیقه 🎬 کارگردان: Olivia Wilde 👥 بازیگران: Olivia Wilde، Penélope Cruz، Seth Rogen خلاصه داستان: رابطه زناشویی جو و آنجلا در وضعیت شکننده و حساسی قرار دارد. وقتی آن‌ها همسایه‌های مرموز طبقه بالای خود را برای یک م

🍓53👎1🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,810 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026

تو با این مردم کوته نظر در چاه کنعانی به مصر آ تا پدید آیند یوسف را خریداران سعدی

19💔2

14 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,010 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#پیشنهاد_فیلم Manchester by the Sea (2016) : کارگردان: کنت لونرگان کشور سازنده: آمریکا سال تولید: 2016 امتیاز IMDb: 7.8/10 امتیاز Rotten Tomatoes: 96% خلاصه داستان: لی چندلر، مردی گوشه‌گیر و زخم‌خورده، پس از مرگ برادرش ناچار می‌شود از برادرزاده‌ی نوجوانش مراقبت کند. بازگشت او به شهر ساحلی منچستر، او را دوباره با گذشته‌ای دردناک و سوگی حل‌نشده روبه‌رو می‌کند. این فیلم روایتِ مواجهه با سوگِ حل‌نشده و ناتوانیِ روا

27

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @tajrobeh_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مرکز تجربه زندگی” (@tajrobeh_life), 9,876 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tajrobeh_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.