Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ты покрылся ложью.

Channel

ты покрылся ложью.

@sxvjkdq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,007subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001676726194
TypeChannel
Username@sxvjkdq
Created21 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sxvjkdq

Growth

4,0074,0314,0197 August 2026 — 4,031 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,031 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,025 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,019 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,007 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,003–4,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:184,007-12
14 Aug 2026, 01:564,019-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:134,025-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:014,031no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:474,031first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.99%
avg views ÷ 4,007 subscribers
Avg views / post
240
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 March 20264 August 2026)
Views total480
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sxvjkdq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026

В мире, где вас с детства учат быть удобными: делиться, соглашаться, слушать, терпеть — выбирайте быть здоровым эгоистом. Зачем превозносить жертвенность как добродетель? Чтобы после того, как ты отдаешь последние ресурсы, взамен получить выгорание и пустоту? Ваша жизнь — это ваша ответственность, и вы должны быть у себя на первом месте. Именно такой контракт с собой и реальностью работает.

Signed an.

22 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC368 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

она была единственной кого я хотел оставить себе, навсегда. отняв у всех. она была единственной, к кому я хотел уйти, оставив весь мир где-то там, за спиной.

Signed an.

13 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC560 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чем больше я наблюдаю мир, тем меньше он мне нравится. Каждый день подтверждает мне несовершенство человеческой натуры и невозможность полагаться на кажущиеся порядочность и здравый смысл.

Signed an.

10 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC593 viewsread 8 August 2026

😘блог владельца. там я чаще.🤩

Signed an.

10 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC900 viewsread 8 August 2026

– вот оно как.. осталась наедине со своими мыслями? – что ты слышишь? – кромешная тьма, тишина, сверчки за окном, звук биения сердца, дыхание, желудок. мысли сплетённые друг с другом. – что ты чувствуешь? – голова трещит. беспокойство, тревожность, постоянная неприятная боль в области живота, межбровье в напряжении, тело находится в уставшем состоянии, но каждая мышца в скомканном положении. – да расслабься, хватит э

Signed an.

8 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC506 viewsread 8 August 2026

Страдающий жизнью — вечно обречен на страдания. Счастливый найдет счастье даже в самом ужасном дне. Все зависит от мыслей в твоей голове и счастья, которое ты позволишь дать жизни своей

Signed an.

1 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC607 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вы тратите жизни на возведение замков из чужих ожиданий, забывая, что жить придется на их руинах. Бегство от себя - самый предсказуемый маршрут, который неизменно приводит в тупик катастрофического одиночества. И никакие идеальные силуэты вокруг не заполнят пустоту, если внутри вас - лишь выжженное поле, замаскированное под цветущий сад.

Signed an.

25 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC728 viewsread 8 August 2026

можно ли сиять, если внутри лишь мрак ?

Signed an.

20 Jun 2026, 22:02 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 8 August 2026

пап, как ты мог просто взять и забыть обо мне?

Signed an.

18 May 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

знаешь, даже когда мы просто стоим на месте и боимся решить что-то, мы всё равно выбираем. выбираем оставить всё как есть.

Signed an.

17 May 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

Keep the memories of who I was before So stay with me because My body's on the line now I can't fight this time now

Signed an.

12 May 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 8 August 2026

😘блог владельца. там я чаще.🤩

Signed an.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sxvjkdq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Apr 2026, 09:20 UTCAnonymous Poll186 voters

?

  1. искать смысл жизни32%
  2. просто жить моментом75%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,081,518 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ты покрылся ложью.” (@sxvjkdq), 4,007 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sxvjkdq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.