Channel
@suki89
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
3,452subscribers
+173 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002446302373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @suki89 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/suki89 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 3,452 | +38 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 3,414 | +30 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 3,384 | +34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 3,350 | +57 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 3,293 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 3,279 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,495 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AD:🌿别人老婆大家欣赏🌿 🔥soso互推B1车队🔥 1. 治愈树洞 2. 【海角精品】母子家庭伦理自拍 3. 🎀旗袍女友的白日宣淫🎀 4. 💦嫂子的骚臀💦 5. 心声树洞 6. 高颜值福利精选 7. 匿名树洞 8. 日本AV女优中文字幕 9. 反差萝莉白虎网红集合地 10. 性愛錄音區🎧 11. 💗乖巧学妹竟然这么骚💗 12. 💒女神美颜和素颜拜B给你看看B水💒 13. 🍆今晚又要遭罪了🍆 14. 🎈这次把她操爽了，床单湿了又湿 15. 🌠风骚的英语老师🌠 16. 成人福利全球少女网黄视频，萝莉破处 17. “小情人车震大胆爱”✈️ 18. 骚货小母狗 19. 海妖日本剧情AV 20. 精品美女/探花AV 21. 🌹偷情隔壁女邻居🌹 22. 御女宫香港三级片频道 BAD:🌙挑战全网最骚骚妇系列🌙 BAD:✨酒店约了个出来偷情的美人妻✨
FC2 无码 中出 初次高潮“求你了，别这样...”被美女攻击龟头，羞耻地潮吹，由于懊恼，在美女体内射精。
FC2 无码 小只 初摄 和一个有着美丽面孔的偶像一起打性爱比赛
妹妹特寫 今日可約喔 密小涵 可低價約 162/46/D+ 21歲 📱 Telegram: @wet58a
FC2 无码 反差 中出 微胖 [露出脸部] 她厚实、狭长的阴部呈现令人难以置信的粉红和迷人。开朗活泼的女孩用成人的鸡鸡接受性教育。阴道液体和精液溢出，在混浊的阴道内进行内射
FC2 无码 素人 中出 初摄 一位在 超级商店工作的漂亮女士给了我一次很棒的口交 [第一次] 她舔我的屁眼并盯着我，然后给我口交，我的大鸡巴变硬了，最后我射精了很多次！
❤1
FC2 无码 素人 苗条 私人摄影 洗澡 内射 高潮 如今，19岁的年轻人都有秘密兼职。她敏感而紧实的身体已经被性欲唤醒，进入了高潮！体内射精
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @suki89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 687,940 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇯🇵AV🔞无码 ｜高清AV|素人無碼” (@suki89), 3,452 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suki89.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.